Packard Bell EasyNote XS20
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 7 scores (from 12 reviews)
Reviews for the Packard Bell EasyNote XS20
Source: vnunet.com
Archive.org versionThe Packard Bell Easynote XS is cheap at £350 but it just makes too many compromises, ultimately making it pretty arduous to operate. If it had a bigger screen, less cramped keyboard, sensible mouse and decent processor then it'd be worth considering, but as it is trying to use it will probably just annoy the hell out of you.
(von 5): 2.5, Verarbeitung 1.5, Ausstattung 2, Preis/Leistung 3.5
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/19/2008
Rating: Total score: 50% price: 70% features: 40% workmanship: 30%
Source: PC Pro
Archive.org versionThe announcement of the Asus Eee PC (web ID: 137289) appears to have been a catalyst for laptop manufacturers. If all you need to do is tap out a few emails on the train, you don't need a dual-core system with 250GB of storage. Nor do you need a 14in screen. Instead, you'll be after something small, light and inexpensive. The EasyNote XS isn't Packard Bell's own design: the original blueprints come from VIA as the NanoBook, and they bring about inevitable comparisons with the Eee PC. A decent stab at an ultra-budget laptop, the XS comes with plenty of storage, but has a few usability issues.
3 von 6
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/31/2008
Rating: Total score: 50%
Source: Pocket Lint
Archive.org versionAsus may have grabbed all the headlines in recent weeks with the release of its Eee PC but it's not the only company to be thinking small as Packard Bell has introduced its own 7-inch notebook. The Packard Bell EasyNote XS20 is a great notebook and we feel that Asus has some serious competition on its hands.
True, it's twice the price and aimed at business users instead of the youth market but the overall design is highly impressive and more than usable – we just wish it had a little more grunt power.
8 von 10, Display sehr gut, Leistung schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/03/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 40% display: 90%
Foreign Reviews
Source: c't - 18/08

Comparison, , Long, Date: 08/15/2008
Rating: performance: 30% features: 70% display: 40% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 40% emissions: 70%
Source: PC Praxis - 7/08

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 70% display: 80% ergonomy: 40%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/07/2008
Rating: display: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: Tecchannel - 2/08

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2008
Rating: features: 70%
Source: c't - 1/08

Comparison, , Medium, Date: 12/31/2007
Rating: performance: 40% display: 80% emissions: 40%
Source: Notebook Italia
IT→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/30/2008
Rating: Total score: 90% display: 60%
Source: Hardware.info
NL→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Medium, Date: 03/01/2008
Rating: price: 80% mobility: 50%
Source: Computer Totaal
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/18/2008
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60%
Source: PCM
NL→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/14/2008
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 80% mobility: 80%
Comment
VIA S3G UniChrome Pro II: The S3 Graphics UniChrome Pro II is a DirectX 7 (without T&L) onboard graphics solution (shared memory) of VIA for laptops with VIA C7-M CPU and VX700 North-Bridge, which is intended for office applications and hardly suited for 3D games. There is no Aero support.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
VIA C7-M: Current saving processors, however not as fast as a equivalent Pentium/AMD processor
C7-M-1200: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


