Intel Celeron N2910 vs Intel Celeron N2815

Intel Celeron N2910

► remove from comparison Intel N2910

The Intel Celeron N2910 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 1.6 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2910 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2910 competes with AMD Kabini APUs like the A6-1450. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2815

► remove from comparison Intel N2815

The Intel Celeron N2815 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.13 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2815 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2815 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2815
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2810 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 compare1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2
1600 MHz1860 - 2133 MHz
224 KB112 KB
2 MB1 MB
4 / 42 / 2
7.5 7.5
22 22
100 °C105 °C
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Intel Celeron N2910Intel Celeron N2815
FCBGA1170
HD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)
$107 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
97 Points (2%)
min: 49     avg: 55.5     median: 55.5 (1%)     max: 62 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
27 Points (10%)
min: 31     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (12%)     max: 34 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.1 Points (2%)
min: 0.62     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (1%)     max: 0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.3 Points (10%)
min: 0.32     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (11%)     max: 0.4 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
844 (8%)
1068 (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
2907 (5%)
2038 (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4302 Points (4%)
2781 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
1206 Points (9%)
1509 Points (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2815 +
1818 s (21%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2815 +
57.8 s (12%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2815 +
594 (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2815 +
4.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2815 +
24.1 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2815 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2815 +
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2815 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2910 +
1612 Points (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
42.3 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
61 s (3%)
92.7 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1566 s (7%)
1965 s (9%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2815 +
min: 850     avg: 872     median: 871.5 (4%)     max: 893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
13106 Points (8%)
min: 2209     avg: 5878     median: 5878 (4%)     max: 9547 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
1107 Points (3%)
min: 166     avg: 459     median: 459 (1%)     max: 752 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
1566 Points (4%)
1017 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
2001 Points (16%)
2183 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
1743 Points (16%)
1950 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
2189 Points (4%)
1747 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2544 Points (5%)
1993 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2205 Points (6%)
1917 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2815 +
1343 (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2815 +
781 (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2910 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2815 → 87% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)