Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N2810 vs Intel Celeron N2808

Intel Celeron N2810

► remove from comparison Intel N2810

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2810 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to out benchmarks, the N2810 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2808

► remove from comparison Intel N2808

The Intel Celeron N2808 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.58 - 2.25 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs. The N2808 supports Intel Quick Sync and Wireless Display.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2808 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. Depending on the benchmark, the N2808 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E2-2000. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 792 MHz) , the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

ModelIntel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2808
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameBay Trail-MBay Trail-M
Series: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2810 « 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2940 compare1.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2930 compare1.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 compare1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2840 compare2.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2910 compare1.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2830 compare2.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2820 compare2.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2815 compare1.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2808 « 1.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2807 compare1.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2806 compare1.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N2805 compare1.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2000 MHz1580 - 2250 MHz
L1 Cache112 KB112 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP7.5 Watt4.3 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
FeaturesHD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 792 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 792 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketFCBGA1170

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N2810 +
59 Points (0%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N2810 +
31 Points (9%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 N2810 +
0.7 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 N2810 +
0.4 Points (9%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 N2810 +
993 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 N2810 +
1474 Points (1%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 N2810 +
2672 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 N2810 +
1318 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 N2810 +
1941 s (23%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 N2810 +
63.4 s (13%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N2810 +
680 Points (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 N2810 +
4.3 fps (1%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 N2810 +
22.8 fps (5%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 N2810 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 N2810 +
0.1 GB/s (1%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 N2810 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N2810 +
1043 Points (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 N2810 +
43 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 N2810 +
93.9 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 N2810 +
1999 s (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N2810 +
2038 Points (2%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 N2810 +
858 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 N2810 +
9157 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 N2810 +
710 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 N2810 +
969 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N2810 +
1328 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N2810 +
762 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N2810 +
2192 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N2810 +
2027 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N2810 +
1715 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N2810 +
1924 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N2810 +
1898 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2810 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.28
log 17. 16:04:36

#0 checking url part for id 4577 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6007 +0s ... 0s

#2 redirected to Ajax server, took 1721225067 +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Jul 2024 05:15:52 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.006s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4577 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#7 got single benchmarks 4577 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6007 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#9 got single benchmarks 6007 +0s ... 0.013s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.027s

#12 return log +0.002s ... 0.029s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)