Intel Celeron N2810 vs Intel Celeron N2807

Intel Celeron N2810

► remove Intel N2810

The Intel Celeron N2810 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at up to 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2810 is faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to out benchmarks, the N2810 even competes with AMD APUs like the AMD A4-4355M. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 756 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2807

► remove Intel N2807

The Intel Celeron N2807 is a power efficient dual-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.2 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock, the Celeron N2807 is clearly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. According to our benchmarks, the N2807 competes with AMD APUs like the AMD E1-1500. For simple everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for more complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The graphics unit of Bay Trail is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed (313 - 750 MHz), the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 4.3 watts (3 W SDP). Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2807
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Bay Trail-MBay Trail-M
: Celeron Bay Trail-M
Intel Celeron N2940 (compare)1830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 (compare)1830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 (compare)1860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 (compare)2160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 (compare)1600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 (compare)2160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 (compare)2170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 (compare)1860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 (compare)1580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 (compare)1580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 (compare)1460 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2940 (compare)1830 - 2250 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2930 (compare)1830 - 2160 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2920 (compare)1860 - 2000 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2840 (compare)2160 - 2580 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2910 (compare)1600 MHz4 / 4
Intel Celeron N2830 (compare)2160 - 2410 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2820 (compare)2170 - 2390 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2815 (compare)1860 - 2133 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N28102000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2808 (compare)1580 - 2250 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Celeron N28071580 - 2160 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2806 (compare)1580 - 2000 MHz2 / 2
Intel Celeron N2805 (compare)1460 MHz2 / 2
2000 MHz1580 - 2160 MHz
112 KB112 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
7.5 4.3
22 22
HD Graphics (Bay Trail, max. 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 750 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, Speedstep
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 756 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 750 MHz)
Intel Celeron N2810Intel Celeron N2807
105 °C
FCBGA1170
$107 U.S.

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
59 Points (1%)
65 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
31 Points (14%)
35 Points (16%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
0.7 Points (2%)
0.5 Points (1%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.4 Points (19%)
0.3 Points (13%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
993 Points (10%)
986 Points (10%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
1474 Points (2%)
2093 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
2672 Points (4%)
3047 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
1318 Points (13%)
1584 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
1940.6 seconds (23%)
1762.8 seconds (21%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
63.4 seconds (13%)
57.4 seconds (12%)
WinRAR - Result
680 KB/s (8%)
408 KB/s (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
4.3 fps (2%)
3.2 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
22.8 fps (8%)
17 fps (6%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (1%)
0.1 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
1043 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
43 Seconds (9%)
38.8 Seconds (8%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
93.9 Seconds (4%)
84.7 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1999 Seconds (9%)
1805.6 Seconds (8%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
2038 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
858 points (4%)
976 points (5%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
9157 Points (6%)
6368 Points (4%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
710 Points (2%)
548 Points (1%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
969 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
2192 Points (18%)
2249 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
2027 Points (18%)
1974 Points (18%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
1715 Points (3%)
1391 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
1924 Points (3%)
1576 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
1898 Points (4%)
1658 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
1328 Points (2%)
1089 Points (1%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
762 Points (16%)
688 Points (14%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2810 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2807 → 96%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)