Notebookcheck Logo
, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP vs ATI Radeon IGP 320M

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP

► remove from comparison

The ATI Radeon 9100 (PRO) IGP is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card with the Codename RS350. The chip supports DirectX 8.1 and is therefore not suited for Aero effects (Windows Vista upwards). Compared to the ATI Radeon 9100 IGP, the 9000 supports only single channel main memory.

ATI Radeon IGP 320M

► remove from comparison ATI Radeon IGP 320M

The ATI Radeon IGP 320M is an onboard (shared memory) graphics card for Mobile Athlon XP based laptops. It features an integrated Mobility Radeon M6 graphics core without Hardware T&L. The IGP320M is able to steer up to two displays (using Hydravision).

A review of the IGP 320M with benchmarks can be found at Tomshardware.

The ATI Radeon IGP 340M is the Intel Pentium 4-M version of the chipset.

ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGPATI Radeon IGP 320M
Mobility Radeon IGP Series
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP compare 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP compare
Radeon IGP 340M compare @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9100 IGP compare 2/1 cores @ 0.4 GHz
Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP 2/1 cores @ 0.3 GHz
Mobility Radeon 7000 IGP compare
Radeon IGP 340M compare @ 0.18 GHz
Radeon IGP 320M @ 0.16 GHz
CodenameRC350
Pipelines2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader0 / 2 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed300 MHz160 MHz
Shared Memorynoyes
APIDirectX 8.1DirectX 7
Features
  • Hardware with Pixel Shader 1.4 support
  • Supports up to 2048x1536 @ 32bpp.
  • Anisotropic texture filtering and Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • HyperZ™ memory optimization technology
  • Pixel Tapestry™ architecture
  • Multi-texturing with 3 texture units
  • On-chip texel, pixel, and vertex caches
  • Supports 3D textures and Microsoft® DirectX® texture compression
  • Support for Emboss, Dot-Product 3, and Cubic Environment bump mapping
  • Bilinear, trilinear and anisotropic texture filtering
  • Full Screen Anti-Aliasing (FSAA)
  • Alpha blending
  • Exponential pixel fog
  • 32-bit or 16-bit Z buffer, 32-bit or 16-bit W buffer, and 8-bit Stencil buffer
  • Extensive 3D mode support
  • Optimized for full performance in true color triple buffered 32BPP acceleration modes
Date of Announcement01.05.2003 05.10.2002
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...http://ati.amd.com/products/mobilityrade...

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
7450 Points (8%)
1537 Points (2%)
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 500     avg: 707     median: 706.5 (0%)     max: 913 Points

Average Benchmarks ATI Mobility Radeon 9000 IGP → 100% n=1

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon IGP 320M → 21% n=1

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 29. 10:15:42

#0 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1911 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 25 May 2022 17:25:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.069s ... 0.07s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.003s ... 0.073s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.073s

#9 composed specs +0s ... 0.073s

#10 did output specs +0s ... 0.073s

#11 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.073s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0.032s ... 0.105s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.105s

#14 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.106s

#15 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#16 got single benchmarks 174 +0.004s ... 0.11s

#17 getting avg benchmarks for device 1911 +0s ... 0.11s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.11s

#19 got single benchmarks 1911 +0.003s ... 0.114s

#20 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.114s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.114s

#25 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.114s

#26 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.114s

#27 Got 0 rows for game benchmarks. +0.001s ... 0.116s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.116s

#29 return log +0.002s ... 0.119s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)