ARM Mali-T830 MP3 vs ARM Mali-T860 MP2

ARM Mali-T830 MP3

► remove ARM Mali-T830 MP3

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets. It first appeared in the Samsung Exynos 7880 in the beginning of 2017. The chip features three clusters and supports OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). 

The performance should be similar to the old ARM Mali-T860 MP2 and therefore all typical Android games should run fluently.

The ARM Mali-T830 MP3 in the Exynos 7880 is manufactured in 14 nm and therefore also suited for smaller smartphones.

ARM Mali-T860 MP2

► remove ARM Mali-T860 MP2

The ARM Mali-T860 MP2 is a mobile graphics solution that can be found in ARM SoCs like the Mediatek Helio P10. The chip is available since Q1/2015 and supports OpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2 and DirectX 11.1. The Mali-T860 can be built with 1 to 16 clusters, where the MP2 version features 2 clusters/cores.

The MP2 version is used e.g. in the Mediatek Helio P10 at 700 MHz and performs similar to a Adreno 405 or Mali-T628 with a low core count (e.g. MP2 or MP4). Therfore, only low demanding gaming are suited for the GPU.

In the Helio P10 the GPU is manufactured in 28nm at TSMC.

ARM Mali-T830 MP3ARM Mali-T860 MP2
ManufacturerARMARM
Mali-T800 Series
Mali-T880 MP12 (compare) 12 @ 650 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP4 (compare) 4 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP2 (compare) 2 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP2 (compare) 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP1 (compare) 1
Mali-T880 MP12 (compare) 12 @ 650 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP4 (compare) 4 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T880 MP2 (compare) 2 @ 900 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T860 MP2 2 @ 700 MHz
Mali-T830 MP3 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP2 (compare) 2 @ 600 (Boost) MHz
Mali-T830 MP1 (compare) 1
2 - 2 -
Core600 (Boost) MHz700 MHz
nono
DirectXDirectX 11 (FL 9_3)DirectX 11.1
Technology16 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 1.2, DirectX 11 (FL 9_3)Open CL 1.2
Introduced01.04.2016 01.01.2015
Manufacturerhttp://www.arm.com/products/multimedia/m...
CodenameMidgard
ArchitectureMidgard
CPUGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 78808 x 1900 MHz? MHz? MHz

3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics Score 1280x720 offscreen
13314 Points (3%)
min: 5884     avg: 9564.7     median: 9806 (2%)     max: 11713 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Graphics 1920x1080
min: 5435     avg: 5972     median: 5919 (1%)     max: 6813 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Graphics 1280x720
min: 9528     avg: 9928.7     median: 9619 (1%)     max: 10639 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited 2560x1440
1180 Points (9%)
min: 425     avg: 546.2     median: 551 (4%)     max: 672 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
1074 Points (4%)
min: 364     avg: 477.8     median: 481 (2%)     max: 579 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited 2560x1440
746 Points (11%)
min: 299     avg: 380.8     median: 385 (6%)     max: 479 Points
3DMark - Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics 2560x1440
643 Points (8%)
min: 248     avg: 319.9     median: 322 (4%)     max: 406 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-T830 MP3
T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 1920x1080 + ARM Mali-T860 MP2
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T830 MP3
T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + ARM Mali-T860 MP2
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Offscreen OGL off screen
15 fps (3%)
min: 4     avg: 6.5     median: 6 (1%)     max: 8 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - Manhattan Onscreen OGL on screen
15 fps (4%)
min: 4     avg: 9     median: 7 (2%)     max: 15 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Offscreen off screen
5.2 fps (1%)
min: 1     avg: 2.3     median: 2 (1%)     max: 2 fps
GFXBench - Car Chase Onscreen on screen
5.2 fps (2%)
min: 1     avg: 3.3     median: 2 (1%)     max: 5 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
min: 1     avg: 1.9     median: 1 (1%)     max: 2 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 2560x1440
0.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
min: 2     avg: 2.8     median: 2 (1%)     max: 4 fps
GFXBench - Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen 1920x1080
min: 1     avg: 2.3     median: 2 (0%)     max: 2 fps
Basemark ES 2.0 - Taiji Free
min: 43     avg: 46.5     median: 46 (77%)     max: 49 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - High Quality
min: 6004     avg: 6373     median: 6378 (14%)     max: 6737 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Medium Quality
min: 13009     avg: 13909     median: 14306 (32%)     max: 14412 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2613     avg: 2752     median: 2725 (13%)     max: 2944 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - 3D Graphics Tests
min: 178     avg: 764     median: 854 (14%)     max: 1169 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Gaming Index
3983 points (87%)

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100%

Average Benchmarks ARM Mali-T860 MP2 → 74%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Mali-T860 MP2:
52 fps  fps
high
Mali-T860 MP2:
24 fps  fps
Mali-T860 MP2:
»
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Mali-T860 MP2:
23 fps 27 fps ~ 25 fps
ultra
Mali-T860 MP2:
26 fps  fps
Mali-T860 MP2:
»
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
177%
Mali-T860 MP2:
47 48 51 58 59 ~ 53 fps
Mali-T830 MP3:
»
Mali-T860 MP2:
»
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
30  fps
97%
Mali-T860 MP2:
27 fps 29 30 30 30 30 ~ 29 fps
high
100%
Mali-T830 MP3:
29  fps
97%
Mali-T860 MP2:
27 28 29 29 29 ~ 28 fps
Mali-T830 MP3:
»
Mali-T860 MP2:
»

Asphalt 9: Legends

2013
low
Mali-T860 MP2:
23 fps 26 fps 26 fps ~ 25 fps
high
Mali-T860 MP2:
16 fps 22 fps 24 fps ~ 21 fps
Mali-T860 MP2:
»

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T830 MP3 → 100%

Average Gaming ARM Mali-T860 MP2 → 123%

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)