Mediatek MT8125 vs Mediatek MT6592

Mediatek MT8125

► remove MT8125

The Mediatek MT8125 is a low-cost ARM SoC (System on a Chip) mainly used in tablets. It is manufactured in 28 nm and integrates a quad-core Cortex-A7 processor and a PowerVR SGX 544 GPU. The CPU cores are typically clocked at 1.2 - 1.5 GHz while the GPU is clocked at 300 MHz.

Performance

Since the Cortex-A7 architecture is somewhat slower than a Krait or Cortex-A9 design at the same clock speeds, the performance of the MT8125 is just below Nvidia's Tegra 3 or the Samsung Exynos 4412. The PowerVR SGX 544 is also just a low-cost solution not designed for ultra-high resolution displays or very demanding games.

Features

In addition to the processor and GPU, the SoC integrates a decoder for 1080p video, WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, FM radio, GPS and 2G/3G radios up to HSPA+. Cameras are supported up to a resolution of 13 MP.

Power consumption

Thanks to the energy-efficient A7 cores and 28 nm manufacturing, the power consumption is likely very low and suitable for even smaller tablets.

Mediatek MT6592

► remove MT6592

The MediaTek MT6592 is a mid-range 28 nm SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. It was announced near the end of 2013 and is manufactured in 28 nm. It includes 8 Cortex-A7 processor cores that are typically clocked up to 1.7 - 2.0 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an ARM Mali-450 GPU at 700 MHz, WLAN, a video decoder for up to 4K content, a LPDDR3 memory controller at 666 MHz, and a 2G/3G (UMTS/HSPA+) radio.

Although the MT6592 offers eight relatively high clocked CPU cores compared to other SoCs, its performance in day-to-day usage is a bit lower, as the Cortex-A7 cores offer slower performance per clock and only a few apps are able to make use of all 8 cores simultaneously. Modern dual-core (e.g., Apple A7) or quad-core (e.g., Cortex A15 or Snapdragon 800) SoCs can be clearly faster in everyday scenarios.

The integrated ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU offers 4 graphics clusters that are clocked at a high 700 MHz. However, the performance of the GPU is somewhat below that of a Tegra 4 or Adreno 320. Also like the Nvidia rival, the Mali-450 lacks support for OpenGL ES 3.0.

Mediatek MT8125Mediatek MT6592
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
: Mediatek Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT65921700 - 2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8127 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589T (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8389 (compare)1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
» Mediatek MT81251200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8321 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8121 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6580M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT6572 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
» Mediatek MT65921700 - 2000 MHz8 / 8
Mediatek MT8127 (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589T (compare)1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8389 (compare)1200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT81251200 - 1500 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8321 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT8121 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582 (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6582M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6580M (compare)1300 MHz4 / 4
Mediatek MT6589 (compare)1200 MHz4 / 4
MediaTek MT6572 (compare)1200 MHz2 / 2
1200 - 1500 MHz1700 - 2000 MHz
1 MB1 MB
4 / 48 / 8
28 28
Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS, FM, 3G/HSPA+, 2G/EDGEUMTS/HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, WiFi (802.11n), 666 MHz LPDDR3, 16 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, GPS, NFC, ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 700 MHz
iGPUPowerVR SGX544 (300 MHz)ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz)
Mediatek MT8125 Mediatek MT6592
512 KB

3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
min: 6958     avg: 7559     median: 7622 (5%)     max: 8034 Points
min: 5508     avg: 8551     median: 9246 (6%)     max: 10060 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
min: 7828     avg: 8086     median: 8066 (10%)     max: 8383 Points
min: 5182     avg: 9113     median: 9762 (12%)     max: 10293 Points
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
min: 7990     avg: 8125     median: 8080 (9%)     max: 8306 Points
min: 5713     avg: 10577     median: 11158 (13%)     max: 12604 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
min: 264     avg: 270     median: 271 (2%)     max: 273 Points
430 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
min: 743     avg: 806     median: 822.5 (7%)     max: 834 Points
966 Points (9%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
min: 2007     avg: 2020     median: 2019.5 (4%)     max: 2035 Points
4185 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
min: 1194     avg: 1208     median: 1204 (2%)     max: 1229 Points
2458 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
min: 1309     avg: 1319     median: 1315.5 (3%)     max: 1334 Points
2561 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1077     avg: 1171     median: 1110 (2%)     max: 1386 Points
min: 1344     avg: 2350     median: 2390 (4%)     max: 2847 Points
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 324     avg: 347     median: 325.5 (7%)     max: 414 Points
min: 262     avg: 438     median: 445 (9%)     max: 526 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
min: 1922     avg: 2135     median: 2134.5 (3%)     max: 2347 Points
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
min: 357     avg: 398     median: 398 (8%)     max: 439 Points
Linpack Android / IOS - Multi Thread
min: 89.585     avg: 103     median: 89.7 (3%)     max: 127.104 MFLOPS
min: 241.989     avg: 295     median: 292.8 (10%)     max: 350 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Single Thread
min: 33.777     avg: 36.3     median: 37.6 (4%)     max: 38.403 MFLOPS
min: 118.576     avg: 144     median: 143.9 (14%)     max: 171 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
min: 16900     avg: 19560     median: 17694.2 (30%)     max: 25949.6 ms
min: 11338.2     avg: 14383     median: 14278 (24%)     max: 19204.8 ms
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
min: 864.1     avg: 1269     median: 1341.5 (15%)     max: 1529.8 ms
min: 904.2     avg: 1338     median: 1182 (13%)     max: 2016 ms
Sunspider - 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1111.4     avg: 1292     median: 1303.3 (12%)     max: 1449.9 ms
min: 1396.2     avg: 1617     median: 1616.8 (15%)     max: 1837.4 ms
Octane V2 - Total Score
1915 Points (4%)
min: 1895     avg: 2511     median: 2563.5 (5%)     max: 3085 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Metal
583 Points (16%)
min: 696     avg: 796     median: 817 (22%)     max: 853 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Multicore Beta
1155 Points (26%)
min: 1254     avg: 1456     median: 1503.5 (33%)     max: 1562 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Browser
min: 1386     avg: 1472     median: 1471.5 (19%)     max: 1557 Points
min: 871     avg: 1559     median: 1694 (22%)     max: 1977 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0
min: 3953     avg: 4394     median: 4393.5 (10%)     max: 4834 points
min: 11433     avg: 13992     median: 14485 (34%)     max: 16058 points
AnTuTu v3 - CPU
5925 (39%)
AnTuTu v4 - Total Score
min: 13211     avg: 13244     median: 13243.5 (31%)     max: 13276
min: 25761     avg: 27891     median: 27979 (65%)     max: 30358
AnTuTu v5 - Total Score
15649 Points (16%)
min: 22774     avg: 28587     median: 29100 (29%)     max: 33176 Points
AnTuTu v6 - Total Score
14200 Points (5%)
AndEBench - Java
min: 304     avg: 324     median: 330 (10%)     max: 332 Iter./s
min: 329     avg: 386     median: 384.5 (12%)     max: 447 Iter./s
AndEBench - Native
min: 6449     avg: 6502     median: 6506.5 (21%)     max: 6544 Iter./s
min: 11657     avg: 16616     median: 17876 (59%)     max: 19055 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - CPU Tests
min: 8230     avg: 8406     median: 8406 (1%)     max: 8580 Points
min: 13907     avg: 22989     median: 25313.5 (3%)     max: 26698 Points
PCMark for Android - Work performance score
1873 Points (10%)
min: 2991     avg: 3194     median: 3193.5 (16%)     max: 3396 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8125 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6592 → 176%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.11
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)