Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT6732 vs Mediatek MT8165

Mediatek MT6732

► remove from comparison  MT6732

The 1.5 GHz MediaTek MT6732 is a 64-bit ARM-based SoC launched in 2014 primarily for small budget to mainstream Android devices. The quad-core processor is manufactured in 28 nm and is based on the Cortex-A53 architecture. It integrates an LTE modem and an ARM Mali-760 MP2 GPU capable of decoding and encoding videos of up to 1080p30. Compared to the MT6735, the MT6732 utilizes a faster graphics unit (T760 vs T720).

Processor

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the popular Cortex-A7 design. In addition to the jump from 32-bit to 64-bit architecture (ARMv8 ISA) to address more than 4 GB of memory, the new design offers better branch prediction and higher performance-to-power ratio that rivals the Cortex-A9. The four cores of the MT6732 are clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and sits roughly in between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.7 GHz) and Snapdragon 410 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.2 to 1.4 GHz). The power-efficient processor is fit for common tasks like browsing and running light applications.

Graphics

The integrated Mali-T760 MP2  is an entry-level GPU clocked at up to 500 MHz. Most Android games will play at acceptable frame rates on medium resolutions and quality.

Features

The MT6732 SoC integrates a memory controller (32-bit LPDDR3, 6.4 GB/s), multiple radios (WLAN, Bluetooth, GPS), and a cellular modem (GSM, UMTS, GPRS, HSPA+, HSUPA, TD-SCDMA, EVDO, and LTE Cat 4). Its integrated video engine allows for 1080p playback at 30 FPS. Cameras are supported up to 13 MP.

Mediatek MT8165

► remove from comparison  MT8165

The MediaTek MT8165 is a 64-bit ARM-based SoC for Android devices launched in 2014. The quad-core processor is manufactured in 28 nm and based on the Cortex-A53 architecture. In addition to the CPU core, it integrates an ARM Mali-760 MP2 GPU and a LPDDR3 memory controller (32-bit, 800 MHz, 6.4 GB/s).

Processor

The Cortex-A53 is the successor to the popular Cortex-A7 design. In addition to the jump from 32-bit to 64-bit architecture (ARMv8 ISA) to address more than 4 GB of memory, the new design offers better branch prediction and higher performance-to-power ratio that rivals the Cortex-A9. The four cores of the MT8165 are clocked at up to 1.5 GHz and sits roughly in between the Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.7 GHz) and Snapdragon 410 (4x Cortex-A53 at 1.2 to 1.4 GHz). The power-efficient processor is fit for common tasks like browsing and running light applications.

Graphics

The integrated dual-core Mali-T760 MP2 is a mid-range GPU clocked at up to 500 MHz. Most Android games will run at acceptable frame rates on medium resolutions and quality.

ModelMediatek MT6732Mediatek MT8165
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A53
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT81651.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT67321.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio X10 MT6795 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 compare1.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P22T MT8768T compare2.3 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek Helio P10 MT6755 compare2 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6752 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6753 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750S compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750N compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6750 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8732 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
» Mediatek MT81651.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6739WW compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT67321.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT8735 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6737 compare1.25 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735P compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Mediatek MT6735M compare1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A53
Clock1500 MHz1500 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 4
Technology28 nm28 nm
Features4G LTE (Cat. 4), HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, EDGE, WLAN (2,4 + 5 GHz), Bluetooth, GPS, FM receiver, H.265 Decoder, ARM Mali-T760 MP2 GPULPDDR3 Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-T760 MP2 ( - 500 MHz)ARM Mali-T760 MP2 ( - 500 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturer Mediatek MT6732 Mediatek MT8165

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
10440 Points (7%)
12248 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 10199     avg: 10336     median: 10335.5 (9%)     max: 10472 Points
12365 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 MT6732 +
11143 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2022     avg: 2078     median: 2078 (4%)     max: 2134 Points
2031 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 695     avg: 711     median: 711 (15%)     max: 727 Points
686 Points (14%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
100%
1 MT6732 +
min: 295     avg: 305.2     median: 305.2 (10%)     max: 315.3 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
100%
1 MT6732 +
min: 114     avg: 118.1     median: 118.1 (12%)     max: 122.2 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11448     avg: 11476     median: 11475.5 (13%)     max: 11503 ms
17410 ms (20%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
979 ms (11%)
1358 ms (15%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 3399     avg: 3489     median: 3489 (4%)     max: 3579 Points
4116 Points (4%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT8165 +
1145 Points (31%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT8165 +
1771 Points (39%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT8165 +
2957 Points (39%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT8165 +
12865 points (30%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 31395     avg: 32120     median: 32119.5 (32%)     max: 32844 Points
34331 Points (35%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT8165 +
1066 Iter./s (33%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT8165 +
10481 Iter./s (34%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 MT8165 +
59688 Points (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 2983     avg: 3126     median: 3125.5 (16%)     max: 3268 Points
4226 Points (21%)

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6732 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8165 → 109% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 26. 14:05:26

#0 checking url part for id 6617 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6996 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.007s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#28 composed specs +0s ... 0.007s

#29 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#30 getting avg benchmarks for device 6617 +0s ... 0.008s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#33 got single benchmarks 6617 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#34 getting avg benchmarks for device 6996 +0s ... 0.015s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.016s

#36 got single benchmarks 6996 +0.006s ... 0.022s

#37 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.024s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.025s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.026s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.027s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.028s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.029s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#74 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.03s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#76 return log +0.004s ... 0.034s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)