Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT6595M vs Mediatek MT6595 Turbo

Mediatek MT6595M

► remove from comparison  MT6595M

The Mediatek MT6595M is a high end ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets that was announced in Feb. 2014. The octa core processor integrates four fast ARM Cortex-A17 cores and four power saving Cortex-A7 cores (big.LITTLE).  It is also possible to run all 8 cores at once to boost performance. The integrated graphics card is a IMG PowerVR Series 6 (most likely PowerVR G6200).

Compared to the normal MT6595 (see for benchmarks), the M variant is clocked slightly lower.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a WiFi (802.11ac), Bluetooth, UMTS/HSPA+, LTE (Cat. 4) and TD--SCDMA radio. GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo and QZSS are supported for navigation and the integrated video engine is able to handle 4K material and even decoding H.265 clips.

Mediatek MT6595 Turbo

► remove from comparison  MT6595 Turbo

The Mediatek MT6595 Turbo is a high end ARM SoC for smartphones and tablets. The octa core processor integrates four fast ARM Cortex-A17 cores and four power saving Cortex-A7 cores (big.LITTLE). It is also possible to run all 8 cores at once to boost performance. The integrated graphics card is a IMG PowerVR Series 6 (most likely PowerVR G6200). Compared to the normale MT6595, the Turbo version offers increased clock speeds for higher performance.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a WiFi (802.11ac), Bluetooth, UMTS/HSPA+, LTE (Cat. 4) and TD--SCDMA radio. GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo and QZSS are supported for navigation and the integrated video engine is able to handle 4K material and even decoding H.265 clips.

ModelMediatek MT6595MMediatek MT6595 Turbo
Series Mediatek Mediatek
CodenameCortex-A7/-A17Cortex-A7/-A17
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A7/-A17
Mediatek MT6595 Turbo2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7/-A17
Mediatek MT6595 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7/-A17
Mediatek MT6595M « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7/-A17
Mediatek MT6595 Turbo « 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7/-A17
Mediatek MT6595 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7/-A17
Mediatek MT6595M2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A7/-A17
Clock2000 MHz2500 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology28 nm28 nm
FeaturesUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, TD-SCDMA, 20 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR Series 6 GPUUMTS/HSPA+, LTE Cat. 4, TD-SCDMA, 20 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, PowerVR Series 6 GPU
iGPUPowerVR G6200 (? - 450 MHz)PowerVR G6200 (? - 600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.006s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_2 entry uid:586042 from 2024.04.22 05:40 +0s ... 0.006s

log 22. 06:21:58

#0 checking url part for id 6470 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6471 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1713759717s = 19835.181909722d, id:gpuID:6470 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_cpu already found +0.004s ... 0.006s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.006s

#6 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.028s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.028s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6470 +0.002s ... 0.03s

#9 got single benchmarks 6470 +0s ... 0.03s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 6471 +0.002s ... 0.032s

#11 got single benchmarks 6471 +0s ... 0.033s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.033s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.033s

#14 return log +0.028s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)