Mediatek MT6592 vs Mediatek MT6589

Mediatek MT6592

► remove from comparison MT6592

The MediaTek MT6592 is a mid-range 28 nm SoC for Android smartphones and tablets. It was announced near the end of 2013 and is manufactured in 28 nm. It includes 8 Cortex-A7 processor cores that are typically clocked up to 1.7 - 2.0 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates an ARM Mali-450 GPU at 700 MHz, WLAN, a video decoder for up to 4K content, a LPDDR3 memory controller at 666 MHz, and a 2G/3G (UMTS/HSPA+) radio.

Although the MT6592 offers eight relatively high clocked CPU cores compared to other SoCs, its performance in day-to-day usage is a bit lower, as the Cortex-A7 cores offer slower performance per clock and only a few apps are able to make use of all 8 cores simultaneously. Modern dual-core (e.g., Apple A7) or quad-core (e.g., Cortex A15 or Snapdragon 800) SoCs can be clearly faster in everyday scenarios.

The integrated ARM Mali-450 MP4 GPU offers 4 graphics clusters that are clocked at a high 700 MHz. However, the performance of the GPU is somewhat below that of a Tegra 4 or Adreno 320. Also like the Nvidia rival, the Mali-450 lacks support for OpenGL ES 3.0.

Mediatek MT6589

► remove from comparison MT6589

The MediaTek MT6589 (previously known as the TMK6588) is an SoC for budget Android tablets and smartphones. It is manufactured in 28 nm and offers a quad-core Cortex-A7 processor, a PowerVR SGX 544 GPU, 1080p30 video encoding and decoding, 802.11n WLAN, Bluetooth 4.0 and radios for Dual-SIM UMTS HSPA+, GPS and FM. The performance is similar to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 Series and adequate for everyday tasks like browsing.

Mediatek MT6592Mediatek MT6589
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A7
» Mediatek MT65921.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8127 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8125 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT65891.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
MediaTek MT6572 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT65921.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8127 compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8125 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
» Mediatek MT65891.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
MediaTek MT6572 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
1700 - 2000 MHz1200 MHz
512 KB
1 MB
8 / 84 / 4
28 28
UMTS/HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, WiFi (802.11n), 666 MHz LPDDR3, 16 MP Camera ISP, 4K Video Encoder, H.265, GPS, NFC, ARM Mali-450 MP4 @ 700 MHz
iGPUARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz)PowerVR SGX544
ArchitectureARMARM
Mediatek MT6592 Mediatek MT6589

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 5508     avg: 8551     median: 9246 (6%)     max: 10060 Points
min: 6884     avg: 8119     median: 8136 (5%)     max: 9830 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 5182     avg: 9113     median: 9762 (10%)     max: 10293 Points
min: 7691     avg: 8234     median: 8067 (9%)     max: 9427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 5713     avg: 10577     median: 11158 (12%)     max: 12604 Points
min: 8134     avg: 9264     median: 9346 (10%)     max: 10309 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
430 Points (3%)
min: 259     avg: 285     median: 280 (2%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
966 Points (9%)
min: 691     avg: 789     median: 779 (7%)     max: 911 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
4185 Points (8%)
min: 2032     avg: 2191     median: 2068 (4%)     max: 2576 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
2458 Points (5%)
min: 1196     avg: 1286     median: 1221 (2%)     max: 1498 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
2561 Points (7%)
min: 1305     avg: 1403     median: 1347 (4%)     max: 1641 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1344     avg: 2350     median: 2390 (4%)     max: 2847
min: 1049     avg: 1181     median: 1097 (2%)     max: 1425
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 262     avg: 438     median: 445 (9%)     max: 526
min: 322     avg: 350     median: 327 (7%)     max: 399
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 1922     avg: 2135     median: 2134.5 (3%)     max: 2347
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 357     avg: 398     median: 398 (8%)     max: 439
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 241.989     avg: 295     median: 292.8 (10%)     max: 350 MFLOPS
min: 88.169     avg: 113     median: 98.8 (3%)     max: 149.263 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 118.576     avg: 144     median: 143.9 (14%)     max: 171 MFLOPS
min: 34.218     avg: 46.8     median: 37 (4%)     max: 73.089 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11338.2     avg: 14383     median: 14278 (24%)     max: 19204.8 ms
min: 15546.6     avg: 16970     median: 17169.9 (29%)     max: 18568.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 904.2     avg: 1338     median: 1182 (13%)     max: 2016 ms
min: 1138.1     avg: 1417     median: 1451 (16%)     max: 1575.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1396.2     avg: 1617     median: 1616.8 (15%)     max: 1837.4 ms
min: 946.6     avg: 1269     median: 1331 (13%)     max: 1563.3 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1895     avg: 2511     median: 2563.5 (4%)     max: 3085 Points
min: 1403     avg: 1564     median: 1449 (2%)     max: 1839 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 696     avg: 796     median: 817 (22%)     max: 853 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 1254     avg: 1456     median: 1503.5 (33%)     max: 1562 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 871     avg: 1559     median: 1694 (22%)     max: 1977 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 11433     avg: 13992     median: 14485 (34%)     max: 16058 points
min: 3841     avg: 4622     median: 3973 (9%)     max: 5885 points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 CPU
100%
1 MT6589 +
min: 5454     avg: 6159     median: 5931 (39%)     max: 7606 Points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
min: 25761     avg: 27891     median: 27979 (65%)     max: 30358 Points
min: 13383     avg: 14572     median: 14155 (33%)     max: 15979 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 22774     avg: 28587     median: 29100 (29%)     max: 33176 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 329     avg: 386     median: 384.5 (12%)     max: 447 Iter./s
min: 300     avg: 344     median: 327 (10%)     max: 419 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 11657     avg: 16616     median: 17876 (59%)     max: 19055 Iter./s
min: 6354     avg: 6842     median: 6463 (21%)     max: 8095 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
min: 13907     avg: 22989     median: 25313.5 (3%)     max: 26698 Points
min: 6337     avg: 8521     median: 8336 (1%)     max: 10615 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 MT6592 +
min: 2991     avg: 3194     median: 3193.5 (16%)     max: 3396 Points

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6592 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT6589 → 63% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)