, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

MediaTek MT6572 vs Mediatek MT8127

MediaTek MT6572

► remove from comparison  MT6572

The dual-core Mediatek MT6572 is an entry-level ARM SoC found in a number of Android smartphones and tablets. It contains two Cortex-A7 CPU cores and an ARM Mali-400 graphics card. The CPU cores are typically clocked at 1.2 GHz and the GPU core at 500 MHz. Furthermore, an LPDDR2 memory controller, a 2G/3G (HSPA+) radio, 720p video decoder, WLAN, Bluetooth and GPS modules are integrated onto the chip. 

Performance

As the Cortex A7 architecture is slightly slower per clock than the older Cortex-A9 or Krait cores, the CPU performance is approximately on the same level as a Samsung Exynos 4210 or similar. The ARM Mali-400 GPU is only an entry-level graphics card unsuited for demanding Android 3D games.

Power Consumption

Due to the power-efficient Cortex-A7 cores and the 28 nm manufacturing process, the power consumption of the Mediatek MT6572 is low enough to be used in smaller smartphones.

Mediatek MT8127

► remove from comparison  MT8127

The MediaTek MT8127 is a cheap ARM-SoC (System on a Chip) that is mainly used in Android based tablets. It is manufactured in 28 nm and integrates a quad-core ARM Cortex-A7 processor clocked at 1.5 GHz (typically), a ARM Mali-450 MP4 graphics card (at 600 MHz) and a single channel 32 Bit DDDR3-1333 memory controller (max. 5.3 GB/s).

Processor

The ARM Cortex-A7 design is a 32-Bit entry level core with a much lower performance per MHz than the Cortex-A9. Therefore, the MT8127 is only positioned in the lower mid-range similar to the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400.

Features

The MT8127 integrates function blocks for full HD videos (en- and decoders), WiFi, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS and FM radio. Camera modules are supported up to 13 MP.

Power Consumption

Due to the low clocked Cortex-A7 cores and the small GPU, the SoC is using not much power and therefore also suited for small tablets.

MediaTek MT6572Mediatek MT8127
Mediatek Mediatek
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6592 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT81271.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8125 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
» MediaTek MT65721.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6592 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 Cortex-A7
» Mediatek MT81271.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589T compare1.5 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8389 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8125 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8321 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT8121 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582 compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6582M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6580M compare1.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Mediatek MT6589 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
MediaTek MT65721.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
1200 MHz1500 MHz
128 KB
1 MB512 KB
2 / 24 / 4
28 28
HSPA+, TD-SCDMA, Wi-Fi, FM, Bluetooth, GPS, LPDDR2 Memory ControllerWi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.0, GPS, FM
iGPUARM Mali-400 MPARM Mali-450 MP4 (600 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Mediatek MT8127

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 2946     avg: 3647     median: 3765 (2%)     max: 4134 Points
min: 7914     avg: 8623     median: 8622.5 (6%)     max: 9331 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 2937     avg: 3692     median: 4000 (4%)     max: 4138 Points
min: 7874     avg: 8586     median: 8586 (9%)     max: 9298 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
4320 Points (4%)
min: 7395     avg: 9011     median: 8974 (9%)     max: 10664 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 MT6572 +
247 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 MT6572 +
628 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 MT6572 +
840 Points (2%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 MT6572 +
487 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 MT6572 +
614 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 473     avg: 550     median: 575 (1%)     max: 586
min: 1205     avg: 1274     median: 1274 (2%)     max: 1343
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 254     avg: 304     median: 314 (6%)     max: 325
min: 362     avg: 384     median: 383.5 (8%)     max: 405
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
443 (7%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1194 (3%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 MT8127 +
448 (6%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 MT8127 +
1216 (2%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
min: 73.461     avg: 104     median: 88.4 (3%)     max: 149.395 MFLOPS
min: 169.367     avg: 190     median: 190.1 (6%)     max: 210.833 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
min: 45.961     avg: 70.2     median: 59.3 (6%)     max: 105.318 MFLOPS
min: 55.143     avg: 81.4     median: 81.4 (8%)     max: 107.755 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 18280     avg: 21475     median: 21474.8 (36%)     max: 24669.6 ms
min: 13843.1     avg: 15991     median: 16411.4 (28%)     max: 17719.6 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1430.1     avg: 1679     median: 1722.8 (19%)     max: 1840.6 ms
min: 1407.8     avg: 1713     median: 1713.4 (19%)     max: 2018.9 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
100%
1 MT6572 +
1769 ms (17%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1317     avg: 1588     median: 1587.5 (2%)     max: 1858 Points
min: 2037     avg: 2328     median: 2358 (3%)     max: 2588 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
595 Points (16%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
644 Points (14%)
1352 Points (30%)
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
1326 Points (18%)
1808 Points (24%)
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
100%
1 MT6572 +
2894 points (7%)
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
100%
1 MT6572 +
min: 9434     avg: 10647     median: 10919 (25%)     max: 11317 Points
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
12567 Points (13%)
min: 22466     avg: 23136     median: 23136 (23%)     max: 23806 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 MT8127 +
min: 25865     avg: 26003     median: 26003 (9%)     max: 26141 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 MT6572 +
144 Iter./s (4%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 MT6572 +
2600 Iter./s (9%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
100%
1 MT6572 +
min: 2924     avg: 3680     median: 3679.5 (0%)     max: 4435 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
1077 Points (5%)
3499 Points (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 MT8127 +
2345 Points (15%)

Average Benchmarks MediaTek MT6572 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8127 → 181% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 19. 11:30:36

#0 checking url part for id 4742 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6538 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 15 Sep 2021 13:09:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4742 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 4742 +0.011s ... 0.019s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6538 +0s ... 0.019s

#9 got single benchmarks 6538 +0.009s ... 0.028s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.028s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.034s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0s ... 0.034s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.045s

#14 return log +0.004s ... 0.049s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)