LG T1-DGBG

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the LG T1-DGBG

82% Edel-Notebooks - T1-7DGBG
Source: PC Professionell DE→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 84% features: 90% ergonomy: 71%

77% Perfekte Symbiose
Source: PC Magazin DE→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 70% workmanship: 80%

87% Notebook gegen PC - Notebooks bis 1.499 Euro
Source: PC Praxis DE→EN Archive.org version
Comparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 80% performance: 70%

77% Perfekte Symbiose: LG T1-7DGBG
Source: PC Go DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 12/11/2006
Rating: Total score: 77% performance: 80% features: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%

85% Flache Eleganz mit Power - LG T1-DGBG
Source: PC Professionell DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/23/2006
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 85% features: 75% ergonomy: 85%

Comment

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)

T2400: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.