Notebookcheck Logo

Mediatek MT8788 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

Mediatek MT8788

► remove from comparison Mediatek Helio MT8788

The Mediatek MT8788 is an upper mainstream ARM SoC for smartphones (mainly Android based) that was introduced in early 2018. It is manufactured in a 12 nm FinFET (12FFC) process and is equipped with 4x big ARM Cortex-A73 cores and 4x small and power efficient ARM Cortex-A53 cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE). The cores can reach a frequency of up to 2 GHz. The processor also integrates a ARM Mali-G72MP3 GPU and a dedicated AI processing unit. Furthermore, the integrated radio Wifi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.2, and FM radio. The specifications of the MT8788 are identical to the Helio P60 for Smartphones.

MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 8200-Ultra

The MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is a upper mid-range ARM-based SoC (system-on-a-chip) that is manufactured using the modern 4 nm process. It was specially designed for use in Android smartphones and is in the upper class in terms of performance. It supports all current mobile communication standards, including 5G SA. 

The CPU works with a total of eight cores, which are divided into two clusters. In the first cluster, an ARM Cortex-A78 power core clocked at 3.1 GHz is joined by three further ARM Cortex-A78 power cores clocked at 3 GHz. In the second cluster, four ARM Cortex-A55 power cores operate at 2.0 GHz. LPDDR5 RAM can be used as RAM and UFS 3.1 is supported as internal memory. 

In terms of connectivity, dual 5G with a theoretical peak download speed of up to 4.7 GBit/s is available, as well as WiFi 6E and Bluetooth 5.3.

The Mediatek Dimensity 8200-Ultra is a variant of the otherwise identical Mediatek Dimensity 8200 that has been specially customised for Xiaomi and features improvements to the camera ISP. An Imagiq 785 image processor is responsible for processing the camera data. Video recordings are supported with up to 4K at 60 fps. The CPU part of the older Dimensity 8100 is very similar and offers the same CPU and GPU cores.

The integrated ARM Mali-G610 MC6 graphics unit can power displays with a resolution of up to 2,960 x 1,440 pixels (WQHD+) and a refresh rate of up to 120 Hz. With Full HD+, even up to 180 Hz is possible.

ModelMediatek MT8788MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra
CodenameCortex-A73 / A53Cortex-A78 / A55
SeriesMediatek Mediatek
Series: Mediatek Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek Helio P70 compare2.1 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek Helio P60T compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek Helio P60 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Mediatek MT8788 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A73 / A53
Clock2000 MHz2000 - 3100 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
1 x 3.1 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
3 x 3.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology12 nm4 nm
Features4x ARM Cortex-A73, 4x ARM Cortex-A53,ARM Mali-G610 MC6 GPU, Dual 5G modem, WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, H.264/HEVC video decoding
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3 (800 MHz)ARM Mali-G610 MP6
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.comwww.google.com
L3 Cache4 MB

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2583     avg: 2605     median: 2604.5 (24%)     max: 2626 Points
min: 5558     avg: 5801     median: 5800.5 (55%)     max: 6043 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4369     avg: 5005     median: 5005 (57%)     max: 5641 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
329 Points (8%)
min: 981     avg: 1117     median: 1116.5 (28%)     max: 1252 Points
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
1284 Points (5%)
min: 3295     avg: 3665     median: 3664.5 (14%)     max: 4034 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 283     avg: 291     median: 291 (11%)     max: 299 Points
min: 1012     avg: 1015     median: 1015 (40%)     max: 1018 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1382     avg: 1383     median: 1383 (2%)     max: 1384 Points
min: 3833     avg: 3874     median: 3873.5 (7%)     max: 3914 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
998 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
3889 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
971 Points (10%)
4858 Points (49%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4983 Points (5%)
16050 Points (16%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4726 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
15265 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
15888 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4789 Points (72%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3874 ms (5%)
min: 1221.5     avg: 1227     median: 1227.2 (1%)     max: 1232.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 10032     avg: 10153     median: 10152.5 (8%)     max: 10273 Points
min: 35231     avg: 38727     median: 38726.5 (29%)     max: 42222 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
0 Points (0%)
min: 107     avg: 108     median: 108 (30%)     max: 109 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
0 Points (0%)
min: 122     avg: 122.5     median: 122.5 (22%)     max: 123 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
213255 Points (10%)
903102 Points (44%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
59558 Points (15%)
269706 Points (67%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 947949     avg: 954196     median: 954196 (32%)     max: 960442 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 261709     avg: 266168     median: 266168 (8%)     max: 270627 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8211 Points (4%)
33757 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 6445     avg: 6836     median: 6835.5 (25%)     max: 7226 Points
min: 13966     avg: 14423     median: 14423 (53%)     max: 14880 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
54.9 MB/s (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
1352 MB/s (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
36.8 MB/s (18%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
1588 MB/s (44%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
0 Points (0%)
min: 784     avg: 828     median: 828 (31%)     max: 872 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
4.3 Watt (2%)
min: 4.46     avg: 5.1     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 5.74 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
2.3 Watt (3%)
min: 0.997     avg: 1     median: 1 (1%)     max: 1.03 Watt

Average Benchmarks Mediatek MT8788 → 100% n=13

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 8200-Ultra → 346% n=13

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 22:38:40

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14628 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15120 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753821520s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14628 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#8 got single benchmarks 14628 +0.008s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15120 +0.001s ... 0.014s

#10 got single benchmarks 15120 +0.006s ... 0.02s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.02s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.012s ... 0.032s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.032s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.01s ... 0.043s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.003s ... 0.045s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)