Notebookcheck Logo

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

The mobile top video card of the 6000 series brought more desktop-comparable performance in notebooks. Nevertheless, it also has a considerable current consumption and heat development.
It is a higher clocked Geforce Go 6800 (not more pipelines!) and therefore faster and hotter, too. It was replaced by 7800 GTX and 7900 GTX.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100 / 6150 is the name of an integrated graphic of NVIDIA nForce Go 430 MCP for AMD Turion laptops. It does not have own integrated memory but uses the main memory (up tp 128 MB) like the direct competitor Intel GMA 950. Therefore, the gaming performance is mediocre and only suited for old games (but better than the integrated competitors from Intel and ATI / AMD).

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250 is a low end laptop graphics card of the GeForce Go 6000 series. It is based on the 6200 and 6400 chip and offers a small amount of dedicated DDR graphics memory. Usually it is adverted with additional shared memory called TurboCache.

An advantage are the integrated PureVideo functions for decoding MPEG videos with the GPU (but not HD videos).

The performance of the 6250 is too weak for gamers. The power consumption should be relatively low, but not as low as integrated graphics cards offer.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 UltraNVIDIA GeForce Go 6150NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250
GeForce Go 6000 Series
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 12/5 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 8/4 cores @ 0.38 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6100 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 12/5 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 8/4 cores @ 0.38 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6100 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 0.45 GHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 12/5 cores @ 0.3 GHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 8/4 cores @ 0.38 GHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 4/3 cores @ 0.4 GHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 0.3 GHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
GeForce Go 6100 2/1 cores @ 0.43 GHz
CodenameNV41MC51MVNV44M1
Pipelines12 / 5 Pixel- / Vertexshader2 / 1 Pixel- / Vertexshader4 / 3 Pixel- / Vertexshader
Core Speed450 MHz425 MHz400 MHz
Memory Speed600 MHz350 MHz
Memory Bus Width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeDDR3shared MemoryDDR
Max. Amount of Memory256 MB32 MB
Shared Memorynoyesno
APIDirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0DirectX 9c, Shader 3.0
Power Consumption89 Watt10 Watt
Transistors222 Million146 Million
technology130 nm110 nm110 nm
Features90nmPureVideo, HD TV encoder, Windows Vista PremiumUltraShadow II, Intellisample 3.0, PowerMizer 5.0, OpenGL 2
Notebook Sizelarge
Date of Announcement25.02.2005 01.02.2006 01.02.2006
Information130nm, 222 Millionen Transistoren110nm, integrated onboard on the NVIDIA nForce Go 430 MCP chipset110nm, 146 Millionen Transistoren, PCI-E
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/page/go_6800.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/go_6200.html

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - 3DMark 2001 - Standard
23800 Points (25%)
min: 3519     avg: 4243     median: 4000 (4%)     max: 5210 Points
3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
11000 Points (6%)
min: 1055     avg: 1138     median: 1160 (1%)     max: 1200 Points
3DMark 05 - 3DMark 05 - Standard
5000 Points (7%)
min: 602     avg: 631     median: 630 (1%)     max: 660 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
3DMark 06
2500 Points (4%)
3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150
225 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x1024 + NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150
3DMark 06
200 Points (0%)
3DMark 06 - Standard 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150
3DMark 06
214 Points (0%)
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
867 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra → NAN% n=

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 6150 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
GeForce Go 6150:
73  fps
med. 800x600
GeForce Go 6150:
6  fps
high 1024x768
GeForce Go 6150:
1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
GeForce Go 6150:
75.4  fps

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.17
log 13. 21:15:32

#0 checking url part for id 10 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 48 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 68 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Aug 2022 17:26:33 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.047s ... 0.047s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.049s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#18 composed specs +0s ... 0.049s

#19 did output specs +0s ... 0.049s

#20 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.049s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 10 +0.037s ... 0.086s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.087s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.087s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.088s

#25 got single benchmarks 10 +0.004s ... 0.092s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 48 +0s ... 0.092s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.093s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.093s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.095s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.097s

#31 got single benchmarks 48 +0.006s ... 0.103s

#32 getting avg benchmarks for device 68 +0s ... 0.103s

#33 got single benchmarks 68 +0s ... 0.104s

#34 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.104s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.104s

#41 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#42 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#43 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#44 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#45 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#47 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.105s

#48 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#51 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.106s

#52 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.107s

#53 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.107s

#54 Got 4 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.108s

#55 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.108s

#56 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.109s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.11s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.11s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.111s

#61 benchmarks composed for output. +0s ... 0.111s

#62 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.111s

#63 return log +0.001s ... 0.111s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)