NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100 vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

► remove NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

The mobile top video card of the 6000 series brought more desktop-comparable performance in notebooks. Nevertheless, it also has a considerable current consumption and heat development.
It is a higher clocked Geforce Go 6800 (not more pipelines!) and therefore faster and hotter, too. It was replaced by 7800 GTX and 7900 GTX.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100

► remove NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100 / 6150 is an integrated graphics card of the NVIDIA nForce Go 430 MCP for AMD Turion notebooks. It doesn't have any integrated memory, but uses a part of the mainmemory (up to 128 MB) like the direct competitor Intel GMA 950. Therefore, the gaming performance is quite moderate and can only be used for elder games.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250

► remove NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250

The NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250 is a low end laptop graphics card of the GeForce Go 6000 series. It is based on the 6200 and 6400 chip and offers a small amount of dedicated DDR graphics memory. Usually it is adverted with additional shared memory called TurboCache.

An advantage are the integrated PureVideo functions for decoding MPEG videos with the GPU (but not HD videos).

The performance of the 6250 is too weak for gamers. The power consumption should be relatively low, but not as low as integrated graphics cards offer.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 UltraNVIDIA GeForce Go 6100NVIDIA GeForce Go 6250
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
GeForce Go 6000 Series
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 12/5 cores @ 300 MHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 8/4 cores @ 375 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 4/3 cores @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 4/3 cores @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 2/1 cores @ 425 MHz
GeForce Go 6100 2/1 cores @ 425 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 12/5 cores @ 300 MHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 8/4 cores @ 375 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 4/3 cores @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 4/3 cores @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 2/1 cores @ 425 MHz
GeForce Go 6100 2/1 cores @ 425 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra 12/5 cores @ 450 MHz256 Bit @ 600 MHz
GeForce Go 6800 12/5 cores @ 300 MHz128 / 256 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6600 8/4 cores @ 375 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6400 4/3 cores @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6250 4/3 cores @ 400 MHz64 Bit @ 350 MHz
GeForce Go 6200 4/3 cores @ 300 MHz64 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce Go 6150 2/1 cores @ 425 MHz
GeForce Go 6100 2/1 cores @ 425 MHz
CodenameNV41MC51MVNV44M1
12 / 5 2 / 1 4 / 3
Core450 MHz425 MHz400 MHz
Memory600 MHz350 MHz
Bus256 Bit64 Bit
MemoryDDR3shared MemoryDDR
Max. Memory256 MB32 MB
noyesno
DirectXDirectX 9c, 3.0DirectX 9c, 3.0DirectX 9c, 3.0
Transistors222 Million146 Million
Technology130 nm110 nm110 nm
Features90nmPureVideo, HD TV encoder, Windows Vista PremiumUltraShadow II, Intellisample 3.0, PowerMizer 5.0, OpenGL 2
Size
Introduced25.02.2005 01.02.2006 01.02.2006
130nm, 222 Millionen Transistoren110nm, integrierte onboard auf dem NVIDIA nForce Go 430 MCP Chipsatz110nm, 146 Millionen Transistoren, PCI-E
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/page/go_6800.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/page/nb_chipset.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.de/page/go_6200.html

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
23800 Points (25%)
5100 Points (5%)
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
11000 Points (6%)
1265 Points (1%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
5000 Points (9%)
655 Points (1%)
3DMark 06 + NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
+ NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce Go 6100 → 13%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)