NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 vs NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

► remove NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650

The NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 for notebooks was established as a competitor to ATI Mobility Radeon 9600. However, the ATI card was clearly faster. It offers multi-screen-support (external screen additionally) and DirectX 9 functions. The successor was the enhanced GeForce FX Go 5700.

The 5600 has either 4x1 or 2x2 design (pixel- x vertex-shader), which depends on simple or double textured pixels.

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700

► remove NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700

The NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 is the strongest video card of the GeForce FX Go series. The direct competitor was the ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 / 9700, which was clearly faster in demanding games. It offers Multi-Display-Support (external screen additionally).

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200

► remove NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200

The NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 for laptops has been positioned as a competitor to ATI Mobility Radeon 9200. It offers multi-screen-support (additional external screen) and DirectX 9 functions.

Currently, it is a competitor of the faster integrated graphic chips like the ATI Radeon Xpress 1150.

The GeForce FX Go 5300 was an OEM version for Medion with lower clock (275/250 MHz) and 64 MB RAM.

NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIANVIDIA
GeForce FX Go Series
GeForce FX Go 5700 4/0 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 275 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 4/1 cores @ 350 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5200 4/1 cores @ 300 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5700 4/0 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 275 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 4/1 cores @ 350 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5200 4/1 cores @ 300 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5700 4/0 cores @ 450 MHz128 Bit @ 275 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 4/1 cores @ 350 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
GeForce FX Go 5200 4/1 cores @ 300 MHz128 Bit @ 300 MHz
CodenameNV31MNV36MNV31M
4 / 1 4 / 0 4 / 1
Core350 MHz450 MHz300 MHz
Memory300 MHz275 MHz300 MHz
Bus128 Bit128 Bit128 Bit
MemoryDDRDDRDDR
Max. Memory32 MB32 MB32 MB
nonono
DirectXDirectX 9, 2.0+DirectX 9, 2.0+DirectX 9, 2.0+
Technology150 / 130 nm130 nm150 nm
FeaturesPowerMizer, VPE, nView Multi-Display, Intellisample, CineFX EnginePowerMizer 4.0, VPE 3.0, 128-Bit Color, nView Multi-Display, UltraShadow, Intellisample HCT, CineFX Engine 2.0150nm, 1.2 - 1.3 Volt core tension, 4x FSAA, 8x AF, PowerMizer 3.0, maximally QXGA 2048x1536, no IntelliSample
Size
Introduced01.03.2003 01.01.2004 01.03.2003
130nm, AGP 8x, 6 Pixelshader-Operationen pro Clock-Signal130nm, AGP
Manufacturerhttp://www.nvidia.com/page/fx_mobile.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/page/fx_mobile.htmlhttp://www.nvidia.com/page/fx_mobile.html

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
9100 Points (9%)
11000 Points (11%)
6800 Points (7%)
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
1900 Points (1%)
2700 Points (1%)
1100 Points (1%)
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
500 Points (1%)

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5600 / 5650 → 100%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5700 → 121%

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce FX Go 5200 → 66%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)