Fujitsu Lifebook S760
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 15 scores (from 21 reviews)
Reviews for the Fujitsu Lifebook S760
Business-to-go. The Fujitsu Lifebook S760 tries balancing a reasonable battery life with a vast connectivity in a small, mobile power book for the modern businessperson.
Source: CNet
Archive.org versionThe Fujitsu LifeBook S760 is designed for business users who need a laptop that combines portability with fast performance. Priced at around £850, this 13.3-inch ultra-portable comes installed with the 64-bit version of Windows 7 Professional, rather than the Home Premium edition you'll find on the majority of consumer laptops. It's not the sexiest ultra-portable laptop around, but the 13.3-inch Fujitsu LifeBook S760 impresses with its combination of power and portability.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/08/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Techradar
Archive.org versionFujitsu was one of the first to use the latest low-voltage Intel Core i7 processor for its LifeBook P770 laptop, which delivered impressive performance and battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 06/23/2010
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Laptop Mag
Archive.org versionSave for its short battery life (a big drawback indeed), the Fujitsu LifeBook S760 is a versatile notebook you can take anywhere, thanks to its small, durable design and surprisingly powerful graphics performance. Unfortunately, road warriors can find twice the endurance and a slicker design elsewhere for less money. If you can live without the Nvidia GPU muscle, get the reasonably priced Express Buy $1,319 version of the S760, whose power-efficent Intel HD Graphics will give you more juice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/09/2010
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: IT Reviews
Archive.org versionThe Fujitsu LIFEBOOK S760 is a serviceable, neat, well constructed notebook. It has enough oomph to meet many people's needs, though if you bump up to the top of the range specs you are looking at a considerable outlay.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/25/2010
Rating: price: 50% workmanship: 80%
Source: BCW - Business Computing World
Archive.org versionFujitsu’s LifeBook S760 is a very nice looking, well-built laptop with some high-end specifications and good features for the regular traveller. Its spill resistant keyboard is a pleasure to use, and the quirky ScrollWheel is a ‘take it or leave it’ feature which you can simply ignore if it does not feel right to you. It may, though prove a useful ice-breaker in some client meetings. And you might not want to use the Web camera software in view of clients, unless you have preconfigured it to remove some of the more consumer-focussed elements.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/13/2010
Rating: features: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech2.in.com
Archive.org versionKeeping all the factors in mind, especially the modest feature set, at Rs.1,02,500, we’d say this laptop is overpriced. There are better options available out there. So unless you really like the look of it, which is different from other laptops, there’s little reason for you to rave over this laptop.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/06/2010
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Computing
Archive.org versionFujitsu's Lifebook S760 is an ultraportable aimed at corporate buyers, and is styled a bit more conservatively than many recent laptop models. Fujitsu's Lifebook S760 is a good all-rounder that ticks all the boxes for a corporate laptop. While its design looks a little conservative, it packs a decent amount of processing power into a portable package and has good connectivity and expansion options. The only downside is the need to watch the power consumption when running on batteries.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/22/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: V3.co.uk
Archive.org versionFujitsu's Lifebook S760 is a good all-rounder that ticks all the boxes for a corporate laptop. While its design looks a little conservative, it packs a decent amount of processing power into a portable package and has good connectivity and expansion options. The only downside is the need to watch the power consumption when running on batteries.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/22/2010
Rating: Total score: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: c't - 2/11

Comparison, , Long, Date: 01/01/2011
Rating: performance: 60% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 70%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/21/2010
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: c't - 14/10

Comparison, , Long, Date: 06/01/2010
Rating: performance: 65% display: 80% mobility: 70% emissions: 40%
Source: PC Praxis - 6/10

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80%
Source: Mobile News - 3/10

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/19/2010
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 80% display: 84% mobility: 82% workmanship: 75% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 87%
Source: Connect

Comparison, , Medium, Date: 04/01/2010
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 86% features: 77% mobility: 85% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/19/2010
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 89% features: 93% display: 91% mobility: 84% workmanship: 89%
Source: ZDNet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/16/2010
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 80% features: 80% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 60%
Source: PC Actual
ES→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/01/2011
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 72%
Source: 3DNews.ru
RU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/10/2010
Rating: price: 40% mobility: 40% emissions: 40%
Source: Prohardver.hu
HU→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/30/2010
Rating: performance: 40% display: 80% emissions: 40%
Source: Notebook.cz
CZ→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 04/13/2010
Rating: performance: 80% display: 50% mobility: 80% emissions: 30%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics: Onboard graphics card that is built in the new Arrandale CPUs (Core i3 / i5 / i7 Dual Cores). Depending on the model and Turbo Boost, the GMA HD is clocked between 166 and 766 MHz.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core i7: The Intel Core i7 for laptops is based on the LG1156 Core i5/i7 CPU for desktops. The base clock speed of the CPUs is relatively low, but because of a huge Turbo mode, the cores can dynamically overclock to up to 3.2 GHz (920XM). Therefore, the CPU can be as fast as high clocked dual-core CPUs (using single threaded applications) but still offer the advantage of 4 cores. Because of the large TDP of 45 W / 55 W, the CPU is only intended for large laptops.
620M:
The Core i7-620M is the fastest Dual-Core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction in Q1 2010). The 620M clocks betwenn 2.66 and 3.33 GHz due to the Turbo Mode and because of Hyperthreading, 4 threads are executed simultaneously. In the package, Intel also included a second die with an integrated GPU (GMA HD) and a memory controller. Therefore, the TDP of 35 Watt of the whole package is still quite good.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


