Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020

Samsung Exynos 1280

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 1280

The Samsung Exynos 1280 is a midrange system on a chip (SoC) for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in early 2022 and is used in the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G. The CPU part integrates two clusters, a performance cluster with two ARM Cortex-A78 cores clocked at up to 2.4 GHz and an efficiency cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz. The integrated memory controller supports LPDDR4x.

Furthermore, the chip integrates an ISP for cameras with up to 108 MPixel. The integrated ARM Mali G68 MC4 supports displays with up to 1080p and 120Hz.

One of the main features is the integrated 5G modem that supports Sub-6GHz (2550/1280 Mbps), mmWave (1840/920 Mbps), and LTE Cat 18 (1200/200 Mbps). WiFi 5 is the highest supported standard, as is Bluetooth 5.2.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 5nm process at Samsung.

MediaTek Dimensity 7020

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 7020

The Mediatek Dimensity 7020 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes two fast ARM Cortex-A78 cores at up to 2.2 GHz and six power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a IMG BXM-8-256 GPU, a Wi-Fi 5 modem, a LPDDR5 / LPDDR4X memory controller, a AI processing unit  and video de- and encoding.

The 5G modem supports NR 2CC and mixed duplex (TDD/FDD) and dual SIM. The download speeds can reach up to 2.77 Gbit/s.

Compared to the Dimensity 930, the 7020 offers the same specifications and seems to be a rebrand.

The Dimensity 930 and 7020 are manufactured in the modern 6nm process and should be very power efficient.

ModelSamsung Exynos 1280MediaTek Dimensity 7020
SeriesSamsung Exynos
Series: Exynos
Samsung Exynos 2500 compare1.8 - 3.3 GHz10 / 10 cores
Samsung Exynos 1280 « 2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores
Clock2000 - 2400 MHz2000 - 2500 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
2 x 2.2 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
6 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
Technology5 nm6 nm
FeaturesAI NPU, 5G NR Sub-6GHz Modem, GNSS, 4k30 Video En- and Decoding, Wifi 802.11ac, Bluetooth 5.2, FM Radio2x ARM Cortex-A78 (2.2 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), PowerVR BXM-8-256, 5G 2CC-CA FDD+TDD, Dual 5G SIM, Dual VoNR, UFS 3.1, LPDDR5
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP4IMG BXM-8-256
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comwww.mediatek.com
CodenameCortex-A78 / A55

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3035     avg: 3147     median: 3111 (29%)     max: 3327 Points
3524 Points (33%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2997     avg: 3083     median: 3073 (35%)     max: 3187 Points
3474 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
min: 961     avg: 968     median: 966 (24%)     max: 976 Points
916 Points (23%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
min: 2021     avg: 2078     median: 2061 (8%)     max: 2152 Points
2315 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 736     avg: 745     median: 740 (29%)     max: 767 Points
697 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1826     avg: 1955     median: 1968 (4%)     max: 2045 Points
1903 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
703 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
1908 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3367     avg: 3376     median: 3376 (34%)     max: 3385 Points
3264 Points (33%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7648     avg: 7739     median: 7738.5 (8%)     max: 7829 Points
8148 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3257     avg: 3258     median: 3257.5 (36%)     max: 3258 Points
3187 Points (35%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7308     avg: 7358     median: 7357.5 (11%)     max: 7407 Points
7838 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6437     avg: 7250     median: 7249.5 (11%)     max: 8062 Points
10095 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2600     avg: 3032     median: 3032 (45%)     max: 3464 Points
3404 Points (51%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1243.5     avg: 1518     median: 1287.1 (2%)     max: 1920.3 ms
1400 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 24159     avg: 29314     median: 32436 (25%)     max: 32736 Points
28919 Points (22%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 106     avg: 109.7     median: 109 (30%)     max: 114 Points
97 Points (27%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 69     avg: 117.8     median: 107.5 (19%)     max: 187 Points
120 Points (22%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 398969     avg: 414640     median: 409976 (20%)     max: 434975 Points
436096 Points (21%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 106625     avg: 117011     median: 120812 (30%)     max: 123596 Points
126035 Points (31%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
min: 459194     avg: 467559     median: 468630 (16%)     max: 474853 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
min: 149202     avg: 151352     median: 150455 (4%)     max: 154399 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4737 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 42.2     avg: 44.8     median: 43.7 (30%)     max: 48.5 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 94.2     avg: 105.8     median: 109.4 (3%)     max: 113.9 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 34.9     avg: 35.1     median: 35 (17%)     max: 35.3 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 439     avg: 458.7     median: 466 (13%)     max: 471 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 15671     avg: 17297     median: 17445 (8%)     max: 18177 Points
27461 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11077     avg: 12301     median: 12053.5 (44%)     max: 13748 Points
13268 Points (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
5515 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
18991 Points (41%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
9824 Points (64%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
10884 Points (54%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 579     avg: 593     median: 598 (22%)     max: 601 Points
628 Points (23%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.77     avg: 5.5     median: 5.1 (2%)     max: 7.03 Watt
3.2 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.112     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.378 Watt
1 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1280 → 100% n=21

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 7020 → 107% n=21

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 28. 22:55:13

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14516 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15104 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753736112s time from redirect:1 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14516 +0.001s ... 0.004s

#8 got single benchmarks 14516 +0.007s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15104 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#10 got single benchmarks 15104 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.037s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.038s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)