Notebookcheck Logo

AMD E2-9000 vs AMD A4-9120

AMD E2-9000

► remove from comparison AMD E2-9000

The AMD E2-9000 is the least powerful chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation) at the time of announcement in 2017. The SoC integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8-2.2 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R2 GPU clocked at 600 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports. Compared to the older E2-9010, the E2-9000 offers a lower base speed (1.8 versus 2 GHz).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the E2-9000 with 10 Watts (compared to the 9010 at 15W). This means the APU is intended for thin and light notebooks.

AMD A4-9120

► remove from comparison AMD A4-9120

The AMD A4-9120 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2017. At its launch, the A4-9210 is a mid-range Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.2 - 2.5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R3 GPU with 128 shaders at 655 MHz, as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock range, the A4-9120 should be noticeably slower than the A6-9210 or A9-9410.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) GPU offers only 2 CUs (=128 shaders) and a core clock of 655 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A4-9120 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-15 Watts. This means the APU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks.

ModelAMD E2-9000AMD A4-9120
SeriesAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
CodenameStoney RidgeStoney Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e compare0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
» AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9425 compare3.1 - 3.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e compare0 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 compare3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9410 compare2.9 - 3.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 compare2.6 - 3.1 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 compare2.5 - 2.9 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C compare1.8 - 2.7 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 compare2.4 - 2.8 GHz2 / 2
» AMD A4-91202.2 - 2.5 GHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 compare2 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD E2-90001.8 - 2.2 GHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220e compare1.6 - 2.4 GHz2 / 2
Clock1800 - 2200 MHz2200 - 2500 MHz
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP10 Watt10-15 Watt
Transistors1200 Million1200 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm
Die Size124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketBGABGA
FeaturesSingle-Channel DDR4-1866, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 600 MHz)AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerAMD Bristol Ridge E2-9000AMD Bristol Ridge A4-9120
L1 Cache160 KB

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9000 +
84 Points (1%)
05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9000 +
47 Points (15%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E2-9000 +
0.6 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1787 Points (16%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2897 Points (4%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1242 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
36.2 s (7%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E2-9000 +
744 Points (4%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 E2-9000 +
6.3 fps (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 E2-9000 +
35.7 fps (9%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 E2-9000 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 E2-9000 +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 E2-9000 +
0.7 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1556 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
26.9 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
59.8 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1304 s (6%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 E2-9000 +
3146 Points (3%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1199 Points (4%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E2-9000 +
11949 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 E2-9000 +
10209 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 E2-9000 +
11528 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E2-9000 +
914 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1255 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1591 Points (17%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2461 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1543 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2371 Points (6%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2323 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1430 Points (28%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2439 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 E2-9000 +
1526 Points (25%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2993 Points (24%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2893 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2847 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2914 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E2-9000 +
2894 Points (8%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
3175 ms (4%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 E2-9000 +
258.9 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 E2-9000 +
10575 Points (11%)

Average Benchmarks AMD E2-9000 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 30. 20:59:47

#0 checking url part for id 9294 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9890 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.01s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#20 composed specs +0s ... 0.01s

#21 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#22 getting avg benchmarks for device 9294 +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 got single benchmarks 9294 +0.008s ... 0.019s

#26 getting avg benchmarks for device 9890 +0s ... 0.02s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.02s

#28 got single benchmarks 9890 +0.007s ... 0.027s

#29 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.027s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.033s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.038s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.039s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#70 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.049s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#72 return log +0.004s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)