Benq Joybook R55
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 12 reviews)
Reviews for the Benq Joybook R55
Source: PC Go
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/26/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 80% features: 90% display: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/20/2007
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/06/2007
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 79% performance: 81% features: 69% ergonomy: 89%
Source: Connect
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 90% features: 84% display: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Chip.de
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/01/2007
Rating: Total score: 61% performance: 63% features: 70% display: 60% mobility: 35% ergonomy: 91%
Source: Stiftung Warentest
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/15/2006
Rating: performance: 89% display: 88% ergonomy: 85%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/30/2006
Rating: display: 90% workmanship: 85% emissions: 90%
Source: SFT
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/15/2006
Rating: Total score: 89% performance: 50% ergonomy: 90%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/12/2006
Rating: display: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/16/2006
Source: PC Games Hardware
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 07/16/2006
Source: Gamestar
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/03/2006
Comment
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400: The NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 the competitor to the ATI Mobility Radeon X1400. Caution there are some versions with reduced momry bus available.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
T2300: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
15.40":
15-inch display variants are the standard and are used for more than half of all laptops.
The reason for the popularity of mid-sized displays is that this size is reasonably easy on the eyes, often allows high resolutions and thus offers rich details on the screen, yet does not consume too much power and the devices can still be reasonably compact - simply the standard compromise.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.2.8 kg:
With this weight, a laptop is rather heavier than average. Devices in this range shine more with screen size and performance than with mobility.
75.2%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
