Asus U1F
Specifications

Price comparison
Average of 10 scores (from 14 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus U1F
Source: PC Mag
Archive.org versionASUS laptops have fervently pushed the design envelope in the past two years. After all, AsusTek is widely considered one of the top five ODMs (original design manufacturers) in the world. It makes every laptop component imaginable, including chassis designs for Apple computers, so it's only logical that it would excel in this area. The ASUS U1F ($2,100 street) is the company's latest bid into the ultraportable market. It weighs a svelte 2.7 pounds and rocks LED (light-emitting diode) screen backlighting technology. The U1F is a traveler's delight—that is, if you can live with carrying an external DVD drive. Only a handful of vendors use LED backlights in their laptops.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
3.5 von 5, Mobilität gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/02/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% mobility: 80%
Source: Pocket Lint
Archive.org versionAs a slim and lightweight notebook, Asus has got things right with the U1F, as we found it a great machine to carry around and work on. It may not be the most powerful notebook out there, though and the battery life detracts from the overall usability but if you’re looking for an ultraportable that won’t break the bank, then it’s worth considering.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
8 von 10, Leistung mangelhaft, Mobilität mäßig
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/21/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 50% mobility: 60%
Source: Tech Advisor
Archive.org versionWith a shiny black lid and real leather wrist rest, the £1,399 Asus U1F puts the "ultra" in ultraportable. The lightest Windows Vista laptop we've reviewed, the Asus U1F was a dream to review on the move as it weighs just over 1kg. This ultraportable has lots of appeal: lightest weight, most stylish exterior, six-hour battery life, and a good screen. But sluggish performance and the absence of a built-in optical drive hold it back.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
(von 5): 4, Preis/Leistung 3.5, Verarbeitung 4.5, Ausstattung 3.5, Mobilität sehr gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/24/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% features: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: PC World
Archive.org versionAccented by a shiny black lid and real leather wrist rest, the $2199 (as of April 11, 2007) Asus U1F puts the "ultra" in ultraportable. The lightest Windows Vista laptop we've seen, it weighs 2.4 pounds, no heavier than a teacup Chihuahua. The thin case offers a surprisingly full set of connections, including built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth wireless communications. You could use the bright screen to find your way out of a cave, and the battery lasts for more than 6 hours on one charge. These are good qualities for an all-day, on-the-go laptop to possess. But can you type on it?
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
(von 100): 75, Leistung 76, Ausstattung 77, Akkulaufzeit gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/11/2007
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 76% features: 77%
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionAsus has definitely proved that it knows how to build an ultra-portable notebook – the U1F is small, light and incredibly stylish. It’s also great seeing a dual core CPU in a machine so small. That said, I think I’d probably still go for the VAIO TX3XP, with it’s integrated DVD writer and nine hour battery life just tipping the scales in Sony’s favour.
ausführlicher Test mit Geräteaufbau und Testwerten und Bildern; online abrufbar
(von 10): 8, Preis/Leistung 8, Leistung 8, Ausstattung 8, Mobilität sehr gut
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/16/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% features: 80% mobility: 90%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Handys - 6/07

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/07/2007
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 50%
Source: SFT

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/31/2007
Rating: performance: 40% features: 80% mobility: 80% emissions: 90%
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 9-10/07

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 09/24/2007
performance: 80%
Source: Minitechnet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2007
Rating: price: 80% performance: 60% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Notebookcheck
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2007
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 64% features: 80% display: 70% mobility: 91% workmanship: 92% ergonomy: 86% emissions: 77%
Source: PC Welt
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/15/2007
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 84% performance: 79% features: 97% mobility: 76% ergonomy: 98%
Source: Netzwelt
DE→EN Archive.org versionComparison, online available, Very Short, Date: 07/18/2007
Rating: performance: 80% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 90% emissions: 80%
Source: ZDNet
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/29/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% performance: 60% features: 80% mobility: 90%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/23/2007
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% features: 40% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Duo: Double Core processor with a very good relation of performance to current consumption. The 2 MB L2 Cache are used together by the double. The maximum capacity of 31 watts is only 4 watts more than with the Pentium M (predecessor). Both cores are lowered automatically and independently of each other by speed steps down to 1 GHz. In addition it now supports also SSE3 instructions. At least it is just as fast as a equivalent Pentium M. With applications, which were designed for multi-processors, the performance can be nearly twice as fast as with the Pentium M (e.g. CineBench around 86% fast)
U2400: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.













