, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Adreno 430 vs Qualcomm Adreno 405

Qualcomm Adreno 430

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 430 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in the beginning of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 SoC. The graphics card uses a technology called FlexRender. It can switch "intelligently" between TBR (TBR Tile Based Renderer) and the classic direct rendering. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.2 Feature Level 11_1 (compared to ES 3.0 and DirectX 9_3 of the Adreno 330).

The GPU uses 192 unified shaders clocked at up to 650 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. It positions itself between the PowerVR GX6450 in the Apple A8 and the ARM Mali-T760 MP8 in the Samsung Exynos 7420.

Although the Snapdragon 810 is already manufactured in 20nm, heat can still be an issue (especially in smartphones). This leads to reduced clock rates and performance during continuous load.

Qualcomm Adreno 405

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 405 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets. It was announced in 2014 and is used in SoCs like the Qualcomm Snapdragon 415, 425, 610 or 615. Depending on the used SoC and device, the clock rate of the Adreno 405 is around 550 MHz. 

The Adreno 405 features 48 ALUs (unified shaders) and supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.2 (Feature Level 11_1).

The performance of the Adreno 405 reaches only 40 % of the high end Adreno 420 (in the Snapdragon 805). This means its on a level with the older Adreno 320 and the PowerVR G6200.

Qualcomm Adreno 430Qualcomm Adreno 405
ManufacturerQualcommQualcomm
Adreno 400 Series
Adreno 430 192 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 420 compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz
Adreno 418 compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz
Adreno 405 48 @ 0.55 GHz
Adreno 430 192 @ 0.65 GHz
Adreno 420 compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz
Adreno 418 compare 128 @ 0.6 GHz
Adreno 405 48 @ 0.55 GHz
Pipelines192 - unified48 - unified
Core Speed650 (Boost) MHz550 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
DirectXDirectX 11DirectX 11
technology20 nm28 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.1, OpenCL 1.2, Direct3D 11.2 (FL 11_1)OpenCL 1.2
Date of Announcement07.04.2014 24.02.2014
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttps://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdr...
CPU in Adreno 430GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM89948 x 2000 MHz? MHz650 MHz
CPU in Adreno 405GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM89528 x 1500 MHz? MHz550 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v28 x 1700 MHz? MHz550 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM89398 x 1700 MHz? MHz550 MHz
min. - max.? MHz? - 650 MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
2151 Points (16%)
min: 499     avg: 627     median: 660 (5%)     max: 690 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
2686 Points (6%)
min: 437     avg: 565     median: 598.5 (1%)     max: 624 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
1660 Points (17%)
min: 398     avg: 417     median: 423 (4%)     max: 430 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
1777 Points (7%)
min: 341     avg: 355     median: 360 (1%)     max: 365 Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 430
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 405
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 430
GLBench 2.7 T-Rex HD Onscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 405
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 4.5     avg: 8.3     median: 8.4 (2%)     max: 12 fps
min: 2.2     avg: 2.5     median: 2.6 (1%)     max: 2.6 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Onscreen
min: 5.5     avg: 7.9     median: 6.7 (3%)     max: 12 fps
min: 2.5     avg: 2.8     median: 2.9 (1%)     max: 2.9 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
1.8 fps (1%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
1 fps (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
3.1 fps (2%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
2.9 fps (0%)
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
60 fps (99%)
min: 59.7     avg: 59.7     median: 59.7 (98%)     max: 59.76 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
min: 15240     avg: 20434     median: 20327.5 (46%)     max: 24085 Points
min: 4803     avg: 6719     median: 5084 (12%)     max: 13570 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
min: 25772     avg: 30741     median: 32020 (71%)     max: 34480 Points
min: 6444     avg: 9754     median: 10631 (24%)     max: 10856 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
60 fps (89%)
min: 59.8     avg: 59.9     median: 59.9 (89%)     max: 59.9 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 2D Graphics Tests
min: 3217     avg: 4949     median: 5193.5 (5%)     max: 5907 Points
min: 1818     avg: 2945     median: 3421 (3%)     max: 3597 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile 3D Graphics Tests
min: 1297     avg: 1812     median: 1647 (4%)     max: 2887 Points
min: 851     avg: 935     median: 884 (2%)     max: 1069 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 4138     avg: 4346     median: 4329 (94%)     max: 4540

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 430 → 100% n=18

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 405 → 42% n=18

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
Adreno 405:
25 fps  fps
World of Tanks Blitz

World of Tanks Blitz

2018
low
Adreno 405:
34  fps
high
Adreno 405:
27  fps
Arena of Valor

Arena of Valor

2018
low
Adreno 405:
30 fps  fps
ultra
Adreno 405:
27  fps
Shadow Fight 3

Shadow Fight 3

2018
low
Adreno 405:
29  fps
high
Adreno 405:
30  fps
Battle Bay

Battle Bay

2018
high
Adreno 405:
29  fps  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 430:
30  fps
100%
Adreno 405:
20 1920x1080 30 30 32 32 35 ~ 30 fps
Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
100%
Adreno 430:
25  fps
132%
Adreno 405:
26 28 35 42 1920x1080 ~ 33 fps
high
100%
Adreno 430:
29  fps
83%
Adreno 405:
20 21 21 25 26 32 1920x1080 ~ 24 fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
high
Adreno 405:
21  fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 430 → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 405 → 105%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 132%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 18. 04:57:46

#0 checking url part for id 6189 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6151 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 14 Jun 2021 17:20:49 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.05s ... 0.051s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.051s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.051s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6189 +0.026s ... 0.076s

#8 got single benchmarks 6189 +0.018s ... 0.095s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6151 +0s ... 0.095s

#10 got single benchmarks 6151 +0.035s ... 0.13s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.13s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.134s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.135s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.149s

#15 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.149s

#16 Got 28 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.165s

#17 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.165s

#18 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.167s

#19 benchmarks composed for output. +0.009s ... 0.175s

#20 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.175s

#21 return log +0.003s ... 0.178s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)