Acer Extensa 5220
Specifications

Pricecompare
Average of 7 scores (from 10 reviews)
Reviews for the Acer Extensa 5220
Source: Techradar

A budget machine, the Acer Extensa 5220-101G08Mi certainly delivers value. It's easy to overlook the ageing design, as this is a highly usable machine.
3.5 von 5, Verarbeitung gut, Preis gut, Leistung schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 40% workmanship: 80%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Notebookjournal

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/28/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 90% performance: 40% features: 10% display: 40% mobility: 50% workmanship: 50% ergonomy: 90%
Source: c't - 16/08

Comparison, , Long, Date: 08/15/2008
Rating: performance: 50% features: 70% display: 80% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 90%
Source: PC Welt

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/28/2008
Rating: Total score: 47% price: 47% performance: 1% features: 29% mobility: 18% ergonomy: 54%
Source: Notebookjournal

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/22/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 50% features: 40% display: 30% mobility: 40% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 80%
Source: PC Games Hardware - 5/08

Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/02/2008
Rating: performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 40%
Source: Notebookcheck

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/25/2008
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 80% performance: 61% display: 90% mobility: 64% workmanship: 82% ergonomy: 86% emissions: 90%
Source: Chip.de - 2/08

Comparison, , Very Short, Date: 01/31/2008
Rating: Total score: 63% price: 90% performance: 63% features: 73% display: 60% mobility: 46% ergonomy: 86%
Source: c't - 25/07

Comparison, , Long, Date: 11/16/2007
Rating: performance: 40% display: 50% mobility: 40% ergonomy: 80% emissions: 80%
Source: Notebookjournal

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 30% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 30% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 90%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM chipset. It is the successor of GMA 950 and features a fully programmable pipeline (supports Aero Glass fully and DirectX 10 with newest drivers). The peformance of the X3100 is clearly better than the GMA 950, still demanding modern games won't run fluently.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Celeron M: It is a Pentium M with halved level 2 Cache and limited on FSB 400. The characteristic of this processor is the speed, which is hardly slower than an equivalent Pentium M. However it can change the speed not dynamically like the Pentium M and therefore needs without load more current.
It is also available as Low Voltage Version with very small current consumption.
530: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
15.40":
15-16 inch is a standard display size for laptops and offers the biggest variety of products.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.2.8 kg:
This weight is representative for typical laptops with a 14-16 inch display-diagonal.
Acer: The company was founded under the name of Multitech in Taiwan in 1976 and renamed to Acer or Acer Group in 1987. The product range includes, for example, laptops, tablets, smartphones, desktops, monitors and televisions. Gateway Inc. and Packard Bell also belong to the Group and sell their own laptops.
While Acer still had the third largest global market share in the notebook segment in 2008, it ranked 6th in 2016 with a market share of 6% after they had continuously lost market shares.
There are dozens of Acer laptop reviews per month, the ratings are average (as of 2016). Gateway, which has an own laptop line-up, has also belonged to the Acer Group since 2007.
69.14%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.