AMD A6-9220C vs AMD A9-9410

AMD A6-9220C

► remove AMD A6-9220C

The AMD A6-9220C is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for Chromebooks (7th APU generation from 2016), which was announced early 2019. Compared to the A6-9220, the 9220C is rated at a reduced TDP of 6 versus 15 Watt and also reduced clock speeds. It integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 1.8 - 2.7 GHz (versus 2.5 - 2.9 GHz on the A6-9220).

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Because of the significantly lower clock speed, the A6-9220C should be noticeably slower than the old A6-9220. AMD compares the performance against the Pentium N4200 in ChromeOS and sees the A6-9220C clearly ahead. The efficiency should be worse however, due to the old manufacturing process.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) GPU is a bit controversal, as AMD states 3 compute cores which should translate to 192 shaders.

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A6-9220C with 6 Watts which should enable thin and light (even fanless) Chromebooks.

AMD A9-9410

► remove AMD A9-9410

The AMD A9-9410 is an entry-level chip from the Stoney-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. At its launch, the A9-9410 is the fastest Stoney Ridge processor (dual-core version of Bristol Ridge) and integrates two CPU cores (one Excavator module with 2 integer and on FP unit) clocked between 2.9-3.5 GHz. It also includes a Radeon R5 GPU with 192 shaders at 800 MHz as well as a single-channel DDR4-2133 memory controller, H.265 video engine and chipset with all I/O ports.

Architecture

Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

Thanks to the high maximum clock of up to 3.5 GHz, the single-core performance should be pretty good. The multi-core performance on the other hand is much lower compared to the Bristol Ridge models. Compared to older Carrizo-L/Beema quad-cores, the APU should still perform pretty well. The level of performance should be similar to a Core-m3 and therefore also be sufficient for more demanding applications.

The TDP can be configured between 10-25 Watts, so there can be big performance differences under sustained workloads.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) GPU has 192 active shader units (3 compute cores) clocked at up to 800 MHz. More details about the GPU are available in the linked articles above. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9410 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-25 Watts. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks, but also 15-inch devices with better cooling capabilities.

AMD A6-9220CAMD A9-9410
AMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Stoney RidgeStoney Ridge
: Bristol Ridge Stoney Ridge
AMD A9-9425 (compare)3100 - 3700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e (compare) - 2500? MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 (compare)3000 - 3600 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-94102900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 (compare)2600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 (compare)2500 - 2900 MHz2 / 2
» AMD A6-9220C1800 - 2700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 (compare)2400 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 (compare)2200 - 2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C (compare)1600 - 2400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 (compare)2000 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 (compare)1800 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9425 (compare)3100 - 3700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420e (compare) - 2500? MHz2 / 2
AMD A9-9420 (compare)3000 - 3600 MHz2 / 2
» AMD A9-94102900 - 3500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9225 (compare)2600 - 3000 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220 (compare)2500 - 2900 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9220C1800 - 2700 MHz2 / 2
AMD A6-9210 (compare)2400 - 2800 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120 (compare)2200 - 2500 MHz2 / 2
AMD A4-9120C (compare)1600 - 2400 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9010 (compare)2000 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
AMD E2-9000 (compare)1800 - 2200 MHz2 / 2
1800 - 2700 MHz2900 - 3500 MHz
160 KB
1 MB1 MB
2 / 22 / 2
6 10-25
1200 1200
28 28
124.5 mm2124.5 mm2
90 °C90 °C
BGABGA
Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,Single-Channel DDR4-2133, Virtualization,
iGPUAMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 800 MHz)
AMD Bristol Ridge A9-9410

Cinebench R15 - CPU Multi 64Bit
130 Points (3%)
Cinebench R15 - CPU Single 64Bit
63 Points (29%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
1.6 Points (4%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
0.8 Points (41%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
2694 Points (28%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
4619 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.0x - 1024m *
751 seconds (9%)
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
24 seconds (5%)
WinRAR - Result
879 KB/s (10%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
10.1 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
53.5 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
0.1 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
1 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
2455 Points (16%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
17.8 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
39.8 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
877.6 Seconds (4%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
4764 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
1470 points (8%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
17953 Points (12%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Extreme Physics 1920x1080
17279 Points (21%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Unlimited Physics 1280x720 offscreen
17768 Points (21%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
1318 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
2054 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
3482 Points (28%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
3458 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
4828 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
4375 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
4260 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Multi-Core Score
3299 Points (4%)
Geekbench 3 - 32 Bit Single-Core Score
2134 Points (44%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
3516 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
2255 Points (46%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Compute OpenCL Score
12959 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Multi-Core Score
3182 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - 64 Bit Single-Core Score
2133 Points (36%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total Score *
2080.9 ms (3%)
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score *
147.7 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Total Score
17423 Points (33%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A9-9410 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)