Notebookcheck Logo

Apple A18 Pro vs Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910

Apple A18 Pro

► remove from comparison Apple A18 Pro

The Apple A18 Pro is a powerful smartphone processor and formal successor to the A17 Pro. This new member of the Apple A processor series debuted in September 2024 alongside the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max; it features 2 performance cores and 4 efficient cores along with a 35 TOPS NPU and the 6-core A18 Pro GPU.

The chip is said to be in large part based on the v9.2A ARM microarchitecture for near-Apple M4 IPC. 5G, Wi-Fi 7, Bluetooth 5.3, various satellite navigation systems and NFC are all supported here.

The more affordable A18 SoC has the same 2 P-cores and 4 E-cores running at slightly lower clock speeds along with a significantly slower graphics adapter. The Pro version of the chip also boasts USB 3.x support whereas devices powered by the A18 are limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

Performance

Its multi-thread benchmark scores leave the Dimensity 9300 as well as the Apple A17 Pro and the Apple A18 pretty far behind with at least a 10% advantage. Overall, Apple M1-like performance is to be expected in short-term workloads.

In the meantime, its single-thread performance comes dangerously close to the M3 and M4 chips despite their higher clocks speeds and slightly more advanced architectures. (The A18 Pro's performance cores can run at just slightly over 4.0 GHz, as far as we know.)

Performance drops are inevitable when under longer-term stress since there is no active cooling solution of any kind here.

Graphics

Like any modern graphics adapter, the 6-core A18 Pro GPU is RT-enabled. It delivers benchmark scores that are most comparable to the Immortalis-G720 MP12, Adreno 740 and Adreno 750; as a matter of fact, it even manages to beat the 7-core M1 GPU in many tests which is rather impressive. Any 2024 and 2025 iOS game will be happy with such an iGPU.

Power consumption

It appears the chip is able to briefly consume up to about 10 W when under high load, with average sustained power consumption figures hovering around 4 W.

The pretty modern TSMC N3E manufacturing process makes the A-series chip very power-efficient, as of late 2024.

Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910

► remove from comparison Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910

The MediaTek Kompanio Ultra 910 is a high-end ARM based SoC for Chromebooks. The Chip is similar to the Mediatek Dimensity 9400 for smartphones, but without a 5G modem and a deactivated GPU core.

The CPU no longer uses classic energy-saving cores, but the second generation of the "all big core design". In this case, there is one ARM Cortex-X925 with up to 3.62 GHz, three Cortex-X4 with up to 3.25 GHz and four Cortex-A720 with up to 2 GHz. The manufacturer has also increased the level 3 and SLC cache compared to its predecessor, which now has a capacity of 22 MB (12 MB L3 + 10 MB system cache).

The integrated ARM Immortalis-G925 with 11 cores is responsible for graphics calculations. Performance and energy efficiency are said to have improved by up to 44%.

The performance in Geekbench 6.4 is comparable with the Mediatek Dimensity 9400. Compared to a current notebook processor from Intel such as the Core Ultra 5 135U the single-core performance is slightly better, but the multi-thread performance is slightly worse.

The MediaTek NPU 890 is responsible for AI calculations.

The SoC is manufactured using the 3-nanometer process at TSMC (N3E).

ModelApple A18 ProMediatek Kompanio Ultra 910
SeriesApple Apple A-SeriesMediatek MediaTek Kompanio
Series: Apple A-Series
Apple A19 Pro compare2.6 - 4.26 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A19 compare2.6 - 4.26 GHz6 / 6 cores12 MB L3
Apple A18 Pro « 2.42 - 4.04 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A18 compare2.42 - 4.04 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A15 Bionic compare2.02 - 3.23 GHz6 / 6 cores32 MB L3
Apple A12 Bionic compare - 2.49 GHz6 / 6 cores
Apple A6x compare1.4 GHzcores
Apple A6 compare1 GHzcores
Clock2420 - 4040 MHz2000 - 3620 MHz
Cores / Threads6 / 6
2 x 4.0 GHz Apple A18 P-Core
4 x 2.4 GHz Apple A18 E-Core
8 / 8
1 x 3.6 GHz ARM Cortex-X925
3 x 3.3 GHz ARM Cortex-X4
4 x 2.0 GHz ARM Cortex-A720
TDP Turbo PL210 Watt
Technology3 nm3 nm
Features16-core Neural Engine, USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps)UFS 4, LPDDR5X 10667 Mbps, NPU 890
NPU / AI35 TOPS INT8
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
CodenameCortex-X925, X4, A720
L2 Cache7 MB
L3 Cache22 MB
Transistors29100 Million
iGPUARM Immortalis-G925 MC11
Manufacturerwww.mediatek.com

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
min: 3443     avg: 3461     median: 3461 (80%)     max: 3479 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
min: 8524     avg: 8546     median: 8546 (33%)     max: 8568 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2437 Points (82%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
6687 Points (12%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 276.9     avg: 278.2     median: 278.2 (0%)     max: 279.4 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 A18 Pro +
min: 98997     avg: 99683     median: 99682.5 (66%)     max: 100368 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 267     avg: 269     median: 269 (70%)     max: 271 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
347 Points (62%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 A18 Pro +
min: 1739820     avg: 1803560     median: 1803560 (52%)     max: 1867310 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 A18 Pro +
min: 476280     avg: 482239     median: 482238 (48%)     max: 488197 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
11.9 MB/s (8%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
603 MB/s (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100.5 MB/s (49%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
4020 MB/s (100%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
22961 Points (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
18722 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 1455     avg: 1486     median: 1486 (52%)     max: 1517 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
min: 3.94     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (2%)     max: 5.13 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 A18 Pro +
min: 0.615     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (0%)     max: 0.638 Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Average Benchmarks

Apple A18 Pro → 100% n=8

Mediatek Kompanio Ultra 910 → 83% n=8

Average of the median scores above. 1 ... This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Amazon Logo
  • $599.00
    Apple 2026 MacBook Neo 13-inch Laptop with A18 Pro chip: Built for AI and Apple Intelligence, Liquid Retina Display, 8GB Unified Memory, 256GB SSD Storage, 1080p FaceTime HD Camera; Blush
  • $599.00
    Apple 2026 MacBook Neo 13-inch Laptop with A18 Pro chip: Built for AI and Apple Intelligence, Liquid Retina Display, 8GB Unified Memory, 256GB SSD Storage, 1080p FaceTime HD Camera; Silver
  • $699.00
    Apple 2026 MacBook Neo 13-inch Laptop with A18 Pro chip: Built for AI and Apple Intelligence, Liquid Retina Display, 8GB Unified Memory, 512GB SSD Storage, 1080p FaceTime HD Camera, Touch ID; Silver
  • $697.00
    Apple iPhone 16 Pro, US Version, 256GB, Black Titanium - Unlocked (Renewed)
  • $761.31
    Apple iPhone 16 Pro, US Version, 512GB, Black Titanium - Unlocked (Renewed)

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 07. 16:44:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18006 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 19853 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1772898291s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 07 Mar 2026 05:14:43 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18006 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#8 got single benchmarks 18006 +0.005s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 19853 +0.001s ... 0.015s

#10 got single benchmarks 19853 +0.003s ... 0.019s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.012s ... 0.031s

#13 return log +0.648s ... 0.679s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
Google Logo Add as a preferred
source on Google
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)