Intel Celeron M 900 vs Intel Celeron M 763

Intel Celeron M 900

► remove

The Intel Celeron 900 is a mobile single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core (as the Core 2 Duo Dual Core processors) but many features and one core are deactivated. The missing power saving features, like Speedstep, lead to a lower battery runtime (compared to Core 2 Duo powered laptops). Furthermore, features like Virtualization and Trusted Execution are deactivated.

The performance of the single core processor is located in the entry level segment. Due to the missing 2nd core, the performance may suffer when using many applications at once. Otherwise (in synthetic benchmarks), the Celeron M 900 is on par with a 1.3 GHz Athlon II Neo K325. The similar clocked AMD V-Series V120 should be slower due to the smaller Cache and different architecture. On contrast it usually features the faster chipset graphics card by ATI leading to a better overall performance.

Intel Celeron M 763

► remove

The Intel Celeron M ULV 763 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 763 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

Intel Celeron M 900Intel Celeron M 763
Intel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
PenrynPenryn
: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 925 (compare)2300 MHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 9002200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 7631400 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 743 (compare)1300 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 925 (compare)2300 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 9002200 MHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 7631400 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 743 (compare)1300 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 (compare)1200 MHz1 / 1
2200 MHz1400 MHz
800800
1 MB1 MB
1 / 11 / 1
35 10
410 410
45 45
107 mm2107 mm2
105 °C100 °C
PGA478BGA965
VT, 64 Bit, EIST, eX Bit
$70 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron M 900Intel Celeron M 763
64 KB

Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
900 +
min: 2062     avg: 2101     median: 2101 (23%)     max: 2140 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
900 +
1000 Points (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
900 +
min: 27.8     avg: 33.9     median: 33.9 (7%)     max: 40 Seconds
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
900 +
min: 67     avg: 81.5     median: 81.5 (3%)     max: 96 Seconds
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
900 +
2000 Seconds (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
900 +
9400 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
900 +
7990 MFLOPS (6%)
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
100%
900 +
2586 Points (16%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 900 → 100%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2019, 2018
v1.8.1a
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)