, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron M 743 vs Intel Celeron M 925

Intel Celeron M 743

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 743 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 743 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

 

Intel Celeron M 925

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 925 is a mobile single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core (as the Core 2 Duo Dual Core processors) but many features and one core are deactivated. The missing power saving features, like Speedstep, lead to a lower battery runtime (compared to Core 2 Duo powered laptops). Furthermore, features like Virtualization and Trusted Execution are deactivated.

The performance of the single core processor is located in the entry level segment. Due to the missing 2nd core, the performance may suffer when using many applications at once. Otherwise (in synthetic benchmarks), the Celeron M 925 is on par with a low clocked dual core at 1.3 - 1.4 GHz. Compared to current AMD single core versions, like the AMD V-Series V160, the Celeron 925 should be faster due to the larger Level 2 cache and different architecture. On contrast it usually features the faster chipset graphics card by ATI leading to a better overall performance.

Intel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 925
Intel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
PenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 763 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 763 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 723 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
1300 MHz2300 MHz
800800
64 KB
1 MB1 MB
1 / 11 / 1
10 35
410 410
45 0.775 - 1.1 V45
107 mm2107 mm2
100 °C105 °C
BGA965PGA478
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$70 U.S.
Intel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 925
VT, 64 Bit, EIST, eX Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 743 +
min: 1230     avg: 1303     median: 1324 (12%)     max: 1356
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 743 +
1398 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 743 +
3886 s (46%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 743 +
122 s (25%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 743 +
min: 557     avg: 582     median: 581.5 (3%)     max: 606 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 743 +
min: 41     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (9%)     max: 42.7 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 743 +
min: 95     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (4%)     max: 102 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 743 +
2252 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 5120     avg: 5607     median: 5606.5 (3%)     max: 6093 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 4410     avg: 4571     median: 4571 (4%)     max: 4732 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 743 +
1913 Points (12%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 743 +
3.1 Points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 743 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 24. 13:45:41

#0 checking url part for id 495 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1604 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 22 Jul 2021 13:08:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 495 +0s ... 0.004s

#7 got single benchmarks 495 +0.009s ... 0.014s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 1604 +0s ... 0.014s

#9 got single benchmarks 1604 +0.004s ... 0.018s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.018s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.023s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.027s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)