, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Intel Celeron M 743 vs Intel Celeron M 723

Intel Celeron M 743

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 743 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 743 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

 

Intel Celeron M 723

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 723 is an ultra low voltage processor based on the Penryn architecture. It features only one core and is intended for the use in very small laptops and netbooks. Many features of the Penryn core are deactivated, like Virtualization VT-x, Trusted Execution support and most importantly power saving functions like Speedstep. This leads to a higher power consumption without load.

The performance of the Celeron 723 is only comparable to Intel Atom N470 on average. In some benchmarks, however, the Celeron can be significantly faster (e.g. SuperPi). All in all, the performance is only suited for very low demanding tasks.

Intel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 723
Intel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
PenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 925 compare2.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 763 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 7231.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 925 compare2.3 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 900 compare2.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 763 compare1.4 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1
» Intel Celeron M 7231.2 GHz1 / 1
Intel Celeron M 722 compare1.2 GHz1 / 1
1300 MHz1200 MHz
800800
64 KB
1 MB1 MB
1 / 11 / 1
10 5
410 410
45 0.775 - 1.1 V45 1.05-1.15V
107 mm2107 mm2
100 °C100 °C
BGA965BGA956
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron M 743Intel Celeron M 723

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
743 +
min: 1230     avg: 1303     median: 1324 (12%)     max: 1356
89%
723 +
1180 (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 743 +
1398 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 743 +
3886 s (46%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
743 +
122 s (25%)
98%
723 +
129 s (26%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
743 +
min: 557     avg: 582     median: 581.5 (3%)     max: 606 Points
95%
723 +
555 Points (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
743 +
min: 41     avg: 41.9     median: 41.9 (9%)     max: 42.7 s
100%
723 +
43.6 s (9%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 743 +
min: 95     avg: 98.5     median: 98.5 (4%)     max: 102 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 743 +
2252 s (10%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 5120     avg: 5607     median: 5606.5 (3%)     max: 6093 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 743 +
min: 4410     avg: 4571     median: 4571 (4%)     max: 4732 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
743 +
1913 Points (12%)
93%
723 +
1776 Points (11%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 743 +
3.1 Points (40%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 743 → 100% n=5

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 723 → 95% n=5

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 29. 14:48:45

#0 checking url part for id 495 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 433 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 27 Jul 2021 13:08:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.005s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 495 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#7 got single benchmarks 495 +0.01s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 433 +0s ... 0.016s

#9 got single benchmarks 433 +0.006s ... 0.023s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.029s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.033s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)