Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M 723 vs Intel Celeron M 763 vs Intel Celeron M 925

Intel Celeron M 723

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 723 is an ultra low voltage processor based on the Penryn architecture. It features only one core and is intended for the use in very small laptops and netbooks. Many features of the Penryn core are deactivated, like Virtualization VT-x, Trusted Execution support and most importantly power saving functions like Speedstep. This leads to a higher power consumption without load.

The performance of the Celeron 723 is only comparable to Intel Atom N470 on average. In some benchmarks, however, the Celeron can be significantly faster (e.g. SuperPi). All in all, the performance is only suited for very low demanding tasks.

Intel Celeron M 763

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron M ULV 763 is an ultra low voltage single core processor for small sub-notebooks / laptops. It performs slightly above the Atom single core lineup and is intended to power cheap CULV laptops.

The Celeron M 763 is based on the Penryn core but support only a stripped down feature set. For example Speedstep is not supported leading to a higher idle power consumption than other laptops with Core 2 / Pentium processors in this TDP range. Furthermore, 64 Bit support and Virtualization in hardware are not supported.

Intel Celeron M 925

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 925 is a mobile single core processor for cheap laptops. It is based on the Penryn core (as the Core 2 Duo Dual Core processors) but many features and one core are deactivated. The missing power saving features, like Speedstep, lead to a lower battery runtime (compared to Core 2 Duo powered laptops). Furthermore, features like Virtualization and Trusted Execution are deactivated.

The performance of the single core processor is located in the entry level segment. Due to the missing 2nd core, the performance may suffer when using many applications at once. Otherwise (in synthetic benchmarks), the Celeron M 925 is on par with a low clocked dual core at 1.3 - 1.4 GHz. Compared to current AMD single core versions, like the AMD V-Series V160, the Celeron 925 should be faster due to the larger Level 2 cache and different architecture. On contrast it usually features the faster chipset graphics card by ATI leading to a better overall performance.

show full text
ModelIntel Celeron M 723Intel Celeron M 763Intel Celeron M 925
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Series: Celeron M Penryn
Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9002.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7631.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 723 « 1.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7221.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9252.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9002.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 763 « 1.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7231.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7221.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 925 « 2.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 9002.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7631.4 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7431.3 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7231.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Intel Celeron M 7221.2 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock1200 MHz1400 MHz2300 MHz
FSB800800800
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads1 / 11 / 11 / 1
TDP5 Watt10 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.05-1.15V45 nm45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA956BGA965PGA478
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M 723Intel Celeron M 763Intel Celeron M 925
L1 Cache64 KB
$107 U.S.$70 U.S.
FeaturesVT, 64 Bit, EIST, eX Bit

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 723 +
1180 Points (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 723 +
129 s (26%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 723 +
555 Points (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 723 +
43.6 s (9%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 723 +
1776 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M 723 → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.22
log 07. 13:31:16

#0 checking url part for id 433 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 1606 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 1604 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 02 Jun 2023 13:55:08 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.022s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 433 +0.002s ... 0.023s

#8 got single benchmarks 433 +0.011s ... 0.034s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 1606 +0.001s ... 0.036s

#10 got single benchmarks 1606 +0s ... 0.036s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 1604 +0.001s ... 0.038s

#12 got single benchmarks 1604 +0.006s ... 0.043s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.043s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.054s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)