Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 920 vs Samsung Xclipse 940

Samsung Xclipse 920

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 920

The Samsung Xclipse 920 GPU is an integrated graphics card in the Samsung Exynos 2200 SoC that is used in Android based smartphones and tablets. It was introduced in some models of the Galaxy S21 line. The iGPU is the first that uses an architecture by AMD (RDNA 2, like the Radeon 660M in the Ryzen 6000 chips). Current information from Geekbench ML points to 3 CUs (=192 shaders).

The performance is slightly below current high end iGPUs for phones like the Adreno 730 (Snapdrageon 8 Gen 1) or Apple A15 GPU, but still sufficient for all mobile games in 2022.

The Xclipse 920 is produced in the modern 4nm EUV process at Samsung (as its integrated in the Exynos 2200).

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 920Samsung Xclipse 940
Xclipse 900 Series
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 192 @ 0.56 GHz
CodenameRDNA 2
ArchitectureRDNA 2
Pipelines192 - unified
Core Speed555 (Boost) MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement18.01.2022 09.10.2023
Link to Manufacturer Pagesemiconductor.samsung.com
CPU in Xclipse 920GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 22008 x 1820 MHz? MHz555 MHz
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 10206     avg: 10662     median: 10610 (46%)     max: 11221 Points
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 17842     avg: 19764     median: 18631.5 (41%)     max: 23949 Points
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 8268     avg: 8617     median: 8547.5 (42%)     max: 9105 Points
min: 15675     avg: 16063     median: 16063 (80%)     max: 16451 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 11774     avg: 12830     median: 12432.5 (37%)     max: 14680 Points
min: 23545     avg: 24333     median: 24333 (73%)     max: 25121 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 6440     avg: 7269     median: 7373 (4%)     max: 7890 Points
min: 12652     avg: 12875     median: 12875 (6%)     max: 13098 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 1702     avg: 1852     median: 1885.5 (2%)     max: 1935 Points
min: 3933     avg: 4084     median: 4084 (5%)     max: 4235 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
12 fps (5%)
min: 32     avg: 33     median: 33 (13%)     max: 34 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 28     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (5%)     max: 31 fps
min: 69     avg: 72     median: 72 (13%)     max: 75 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 60     avg: 68     median: 67.5 (5%)     max: 77 fps
min: 153     avg: 164.5     median: 164.5 (12%)     max: 176 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 63     avg: 67.5     median: 67.5 (8%)     max: 72 fps
min: 131     avg: 135     median: 135 (15%)     max: 139 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 101     avg: 120.3     median: 125 (3%)     max: 130 fps
min: 214     avg: 229     median: 229 (5%)     max: 244 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 135     avg: 182.3     median: 190 (11%)     max: 214 fps
min: 289     avg: 299.5     median: 299.5 (18%)     max: 310 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 920
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 218     avg: 285.5     median: 302 (2%)     max: 320 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
min: 378     avg: 390.5     median: 390.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
min: 306511     avg: 328113     median: 319781 (40%)     max: 366379 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
136.6 fps (1%)
min: 239     avg: 244     median: 244 (2%)     max: 249 fps
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
8042 Points (2%)
min: 16906     avg: 16947     median: 16946.5 (5%)     max: 16987 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
8695 Points (3%)
min: 16011     avg: 16045     median: 16044.5 (5%)     max: 16078 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 8.3     avg: 9.8     median: 9.2 (4%)     max: 12.6 Watt
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.7 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 196% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

League of Legends: Wild Rift

League of Legends: Wild Rift

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Call of Duty Mobile

Call of Duty Mobile

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
60  fps
Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.5  fps
101%
Xclipse 940:
59 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
59.3  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 920:
58.2  fps
101%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 ~ 59 fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 103 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 58.3 ~ 44 fps
205%
Xclipse 940:
90 90 ~ 90 fps
med.
100%
Xclipse 920:
39.5  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 920:
30 30 30 39.8 ~ 32 fps
188%
Xclipse 940:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
ultra
Xclipse 940:
40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
Xclipse 940:
105 119 ~ 112 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 920 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 149%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 130%

Samsung Xclipse 920lowmed.highultraQHD4K
League of Legends: Wild Rift60
Call of Duty Mobile60
Genshin Impact59.559.358.2
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile4439.532
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
1

2


1
2

1







Samsung Xclipse 940lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact6059
PUBG Mobile906040
Dead Trigger 2112
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

2





2

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 03. 02:16:06

#0 checking url part for id 11147 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 01 May 2024 05:36:19 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.179s ... 0.18s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.18s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.18s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11147 +0.043s ... 0.223s

#8 got single benchmarks 11147 +0.015s ... 0.239s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.002s ... 0.241s

#10 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.014s ... 0.254s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.254s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.115s ... 0.37s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.37s

#14 Got 26 rows for game benchmarks. +0.016s ... 0.385s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.385s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.003s ... 0.389s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.016s ... 0.404s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.404s

#19 return log +0.067s ... 0.472s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)