Notebookcheck

Review Asus Eee PC 1215N Netbook

Tobias Winkler, 10/18/2010

Power-Netbook. Even the first generation of Ion Netbooks proved that they could shine in many application areas with appealing graphics performance. Ion 2 builds on this achievement, and even provides a dual-core Atom processor to assist the Eee PC 1215N. What can be expected has been tested by us.

One big shortcoming of Intel based Netbooks up until now is still the for some purposes insufficient graphics power. Little has changed in this respect with the current Intel GMA 3150, compared to the Intel GMA 950 graphics processor. Especially when it comes to playing back HD content smoothly, the DXVA capability is still missing from the GPU. Nvidia's Ion chipset from the first generation could in comparison bring significantly more performance from the beginning, and did not disappoint with its full-HD performance. Ion 2 is now the next development from this train of thought, to also provide Netbooks with good graphics performance. Due to licensing reasons Nvidia Ion 2 did however have to be limited to the graphics section, and could therefore not develop an entire chipset. This is now provided by Intel, including GMA 3150, and was extended with a graphics chip and Optimus technology by Nvidia.

The Asus Eee PC 1215N is currently available in black and silver, with identical configurations. We tested the black model, which contained the Intel dual-core Atom D525 with 2x 1.8 GHz, 2 GB of DDR3 RAM, 250 GB hard drive, a 12" WXGA display, and the Ion 2 chipset. The retail price is currently roughly 500 Euros, which puts it among the elite in the Netbook space.

Case

Matt surfaces with a hint of chic
Matt surfaces with a hint of chic

After the recent high-gloss hysteria in the notebook domain, some manufacturers appear to be orientating themselves more in the direction of practicality and sensibility with some models, and are releasing new devices with more matte surfaces. This also applies to the Asus Eee PC 1215N, which is almost exclusively clad in silk-matte black. Finger prints and other blemishes are less visible as a result, and it takes longer for these to accumulate. Merely the display frame is covered in a high-gloss surface, which is incidentally less favorable than some other areas could have been, since this causes not only the display to provide reflections, but also its frame. As previously mentioned, there is also a silver variant available, as well as one in red which is already listed on the Asus website, but is currently not yet available to buy.

The surfaces altogether make a good quality and haptically pleasing impression, but do not reach the standard of some of the competitor models such as the HP Mini 5101. Smart buttons and decent silver colored panels, such as around the touchpad, improve the general appearance. The stiffness of the case is good, and the surfaces only bend in some areas with mediocre pressure applied. These include the keyboard and the display lid. The display is firmely held in place by solid hinges, but cannot be opened with a single hand due to the weight distribution on the base plate (battery at the back).

The dimensions of 296(W) x 203(D) x 37(H) mm, as well as the weight of 1.45 kg, are more or less the same as other 12" Netbooks in the lower price range, and thus don't provide any particular advantages. The tested model is equipped with a 6-cell battery; alternative variants with different weights, sizes, or battery lives are currently not listed.

The bottom surface provides access to the two RAM slots via a maintenance panel, other access panels are not available.

Connectivity

 

Asus touts USB 3.0 on the Eee PC 1215N website extensively. Unfortunately this interface is only available optionally, and not included with our tested model. We therefore had to make due with 3x USB 2.0, VGA, HDMI, LAN RJ-45, Bluetooth 3.0, WiFi 802.11 b/g/n, audio input/output, CardReader, and a 0.3 MP Webcam. Somewhat surprising is the good signal quality from the analog VGA output, despite the available HDMI interface, which provides a good resolution with 1280x1024 picture pixels.

Front: status LEDs
Front: status LEDs
Left: power input, VGA, HDMI, USB 2.0, CardReader
Left: power input, VGA, HDMI, USB 2.0, CardReader
Back: 56 Wh battery
Back: 56 Wh battery
Right: audio, 2x USB 2.0, LAN, Kensington
Right: audio, 2x USB 2.0, LAN, Kensington

We are very happy with the distribution of the interfaces. All the ports have been moved towards the back as much as possible, and thus prevent possible issues with attached peripheral devices getting in the way. While the lack of a USB 3.0 port is relatively unimportant when it comes to printers or a mouse, external hard drives would clearly profit from its addition. These have achieved data transfer rates of up to 120 MB/s depending on the notebook in our previous tests. Even lower performance hard drives managed to reach rates of 70 MB/s, and are thus twice as fast as the best USB 2.0 hard drives, which average with rates of about 33 MB/s. We achieved a maximum of 27.9 MB/s using the USB 2.0 interface on our tested device.

Provisions for further additional extensions, such as a Docking Port or an ExpressCard slot, are not available for the Eee PC 1215N; although this would not be common for a device of this type. The warranty covers a period of 24 months.

Input Devices

Keyboard

The keyboard with its chiclet style design uses more or less the whole width of the case, and can shine with amply sized keys. Particularly the arrow keys are very big, and even surpass those on many 15" and 17" notebooks. The layout adheres to the usual design, and allows a swift familiarization. Many additional functions are integrated via the Fn combinations, wireless modules and the power saver / high performance profiles can also be accessed via hardware switches. The labeling is clear with good contrast, and can be read easily in normal lighting conditions. A backlit keyboard is not available.

The keyboard is firmly integrated into the case right up to the edges, although the central area can be bent when applying pressure. This did not have a negative impact during the typing test, but frequent typists could likely develop a dislike for this over time. Otherwise the keys have a medium length travel, a somewhat mechanical sounding endstop, and a decent pressure point. Most users should immediately take a liking to it.

Touchpad

The touchpad is very big, and as a consequence allows ideal use of the multi-touch functionality. Together with the successful traction properties of the surface, the multi-finger gestures can be well used. The Synaptics system configuration allows the functions to be adapted individually. The stubborn touchpad buttons, which require a resounding 'click' and are only reliable towards their edges due to the one-button design, are less favorable.

Keyboard
Keyboard
Touchpad
Touchpad
Hardware switch
Hardware switch
On / off switch
On / off switch
Fn / Ctrl arrangement
Fn / Ctrl arrangement
Arrow buttons
Arrow buttons
Fn combinations
Fn combinations
Stubborn buttons
Stubborn buttons

Display

Darkened display
Darkened display
Full brightness
Full brightness

A Netbook in this class would be expected to be well adapted to the requirements of a mobile device. Unfortunately this is not really the case with the Eee PC 1215N, at least not when it comes to the display. Adopted was a 12" LED WXGA display with a resolution of 1366x768 pixels, which provides for a pleasant working area relative to the display dimensions.

The reflective surface of the display, and the below average maximum brightness of 174 cd/m² can however only be categorized as inappropriate. Combined both of these characteristics make using the device under direct sunlight near enough impossible, and the use under varying lighting conditions, such as in a train, is only possible within limits. Occurring reflections cannot be trumped by the too weak brightness of the display, which implies that the reflections of surrounding objects is more pronounced than the displayed images.

170
cd/m²
174
cd/m²
172
cd/m²
163
cd/m²
171
cd/m²
169
cd/m²
156
cd/m²
165
cd/m²
161
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Information
Mavo Monitor
Maximum: 174 cd/m²
Average: 166.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 171 cd/m²
Black: 0.84 cd/m²
Contrast: 204:1

Indoors this scenario is less likely, but even in these surroundings consideration has to be given to the lighting conditions, clothing, and seating position, since these factors can have a negative impact on the visibility of the display. Due to the fact that this scenario is exacerbated by reduced brightness, it is likely that the maximum brightness will be used at all times, which eliminates the possibility of using more frugal power settings with a brightness of around 130 cd/m².

Altogether from 9 measurement points we determined a very good illumination distribution of 90%, and an average maximum brightness of 166,8 cd/m².

Asus 1215N vs sRGB (t)
Asus 1215N vs sRGB (t)
Asus 1215N vs Adobe RGB (t)
Asus 1215N vs Adobe RGB (t)

The color space is representative of current standard displays, and covers noticeably less than the sRGB color space. The same can be said of the contrast level of 204:1, which provides a meager black, that is not sufficient for representing multimedia content.

The viewing angle stability is noticeably better horizontally than vertically as usual. The displayed images remain recognizable at all times, and merely lose brightness and saturation. The viewing angles from above or below from wide angles cause inverted or faded images, which can become unrecognizable from extreme angles.

Viewing angles Asus Eee PC 1215N
Viewing angles Asus Eee PC 1215N

Performance

The performance determining component of our tested device is the Nvidia Ion 2 graphics chip, and the Intel dual-core Atom D525, which are integrated with the Intel NM10 chipset. In addition to this are the 2 GB of DDR3 RAM, and a 250 GB hard drive.

The adopted Intel Atom D525 CPU is actually intended for Nettops, and makes itself particularly noticeable due to its high TDP of 18 Watts, compared to the mobile variant Atom N550 1.5 GHz (8.5 Watts). With respect to performance this disadvantage is at least compensated for by the higher clock speed of 1.8 GHz, which should provide for better performance together with the second core.

Our CPU benchmarks can however only confirm these expectations partially. The single core superPi 32m calculation required 3825 seconds with the Atom D525 processor, wPrime 1024m used all the threads and required 1692 seconds, and the Cinebench R10 32-bit achieved 634 (single) and 1773 (multi) points. This shows that programs which are conceived for several cores profit significantly more than single-thread applications, that merely benefit from the higher clock speed. Please refer to our comprehensive CPU benchmark list for comparisons.

Systeminfo CPUZ CPU
Systeminfo CPUZ Cache
Systeminfo CPUZ Mainboard
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM
Systeminfo CPUZ RAM SPD
Systeminfo GPUZ Intel
Systeminfo GPUZ Nvidia
Systeminfo HDTune
System information Asus Eee PC 1215N

Most practical work tasks are smoothly carried out. Particularly when running applications in parallel, with several open browser tabs, and playing music in the background, it does not lead to a apparent limitations. Conversions or demanding image editing tasks, such as the use of filters or processing of video, do bring the device to its limits fairly quickly though. This can however be noticeably streched, assuming the CUDA engine can lend support with the appropriate software. In this case the demanding conversion is carried out in the background by the graphics chip, and the remaining applications have enough system resources available.

Our test system had 2 graphics chips, which were automatically utilized depending on the application and requirements by Nvidia's Optimus technology. For office and internet etc., the Intel GMA 3150 is sufficient, and for full-HD video or simple 3D games Ion 2 is automatically activated. At least that's the idea.

A glance at the Nvidia system configuration is to be recommended regularly, since the test showed that the preferred GPU is not always assigned to installed programs.

In practice the system works remarkably well following the correct assignment. The user does not notice the switch, and has an enormous comfort advantage compared to alternative solutions, such as those that require manual switching, as a result.

During the 3D Mark Vantage test the device reached 725 points (3D Mark'06 2409 points), Cinebench R10 OpenGL Shading (32-bit) offered 1266, and Cinebench R11.5 6.26 points.

Our full-HD test videos could be played back without any glitches, and with low CPU utilization, as we expected. YouTube videos also played smoothly. Using Badaboom we converted a video with the CUDA engine, and achieved 22.7 FPS. This is a little less than the Nvidia Ion 1 in the Samsung N510 achieved with 23.9 FPS, but we also used a slightly different video file with a slightly different resolution. A direct comparison is hence only possible to a certain extent. The CPU utilization did however lie at less than 10%.

The latencies of the Asus Eee PC stayed within permissible boundaries throughout, and didn't indicate any limitations.

CPU utilization full HD video
CPU utilization full HD video
CPU utilization Badaboom
CPU utilization Badaboom
DPC Latency Checker
DPC Latency Checker
Nvidia system configuration
Nvidia system configuration
3.3
Windows 7 Experience Index
Processor
Calculations per second
3.5
Memory (RAM)
Memory operations per second
5
Graphics
Desktop performance for Windows Aero
3.3
Gaming graphics
3D business and gaming graphics
3.7
Primary hard disk
Disk data transfer rate
5.8
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
634
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
1773
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
1266
Help
Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit) in comparison
Lenovo IdeaPad S12 (min)
 N270, GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)
482
   ...
Lenovo IdeaTab Lynx K3011
 Z2760, SGX545
1707
Lenovo IdeaTab Miix 10 64GB
 Z2760, SGX545
1711
Asus Lamborghini VX6
 D525, ION 2
1715
Asus Eee PC 1215N
 D525, ION 2
1773
HP Compaq Presario CQ58-350SG
 E1-1200, Radeon HD 7310
1791
Asus Eee PC R052C-WHI002S
 N2800, Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
1829
Lenovo ThinkPad X120e
 E-350, Radeon HD 6310
1887
   ...
Eurocom Panther 5D (max)
 E5-2697 v2, Quadro K5100M
34776
PC Mark
PCMark Vantage1794 points
Help

The application performance is subjectively good, and is also confirmed with the benchmark result of 1794 points from PC Mark Vantage. Office, internet, video-telephony, multimedia and also, with the above mentioned limitations, image editing can be accomplished with good performance. But programs that are not optimized for multi-core processors are especially hindered, although the remaining components could still be exerted to a higher extent.

 

3D Mark
3DMark 053961 points
3DMark 06
 1280x1024
2409 points
3DMark Vantage725 points
Help
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 ST9250315AS
Transfer Rate Minimum: 36.1 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 77.6 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 60.9 MB/s
Access Time: 18 ms
Burst Rate: 77.7 MB/s
CPU Usage: 2 %

The mass storage device is as can be expected, a conventional hard drive from Seagate, that turns with 5400 RPMs. The data transfer rates at 60.9 MB/s on average, are in the usual domain, and don't indicate any disadvantages. Faster storage devices such as hard drives with 7200 RPMs, or even SSDs, as indicated by previous tests, can only make limited use of their speed advantage, since the Atom CPU is not always fast enough to process the data.

Gaming Verdict

As the benchmark results already lead to assume, demanding 3D shooters with a high resolution and quality settings aren't worth serious consideration. Less demanding games can however be played smoothly with the native WXGA resolution, and are displayed considerably well. The bottleneck in the system appears to be the Atom CPU, rather than the Ion 2 graphics chip, since the results are partially lagging behind Intel HD combinations with higher performance CPUs. We tested Sims 3 and Anno 1404.

Sims 3 works well with medium and low settings. Despite the high frame rates there are still short intermittent glitches from time to time. It is also possible to play with the native display resolution, but this requires lowering of the quality settings.

With our minimal settings it was also possible to play Anno 1404, after a noticeably long loading time, with a subjectively smooth 31 FPS. Limitations were not apparent. Even when using the native resolution of 1366x768 pixels, and low quality settings, it is only necessary to compromise 7 FPS (24 FPS), which is still enough to provide for a glitch free game play.

low med.high ultra
Sims 3 (2009) 5729fps
Anno 1404 (2009) 31fps

Emissions

System Noise

The system noise is not especially quiet, but very very restrained in all scenarios at 30 dB(A), and merely noticeably with 33 dB(A) under a full load. Even the hard drive is in line with this almost non-existent noise ambiance, with 30.9 dB(A), and only makes itself noticeable when accessing data with a quiet rattling.

Noise Level

Idle 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB(A)
HDD 30.9 dB(A)
Load 31.1 / 33.8 dB(A)
 
    30 dB
silent
40 dB
audible
50 dB
loud
 
min: , med: , max:     (15 cm distance)

Temperature

The low cooling fan activity doesn't lead to a pronounced development of heat despite the desktop CPU. The surfaces consistently stay very cool, and as a result allow all thinkable types of use including extended resting on the lap.

Max. Load
 28.7 °C27.6 °C25.0 °C 
 28.8 °C28.1 °C24.7 °C 
 26.4 °C26.2 °C23.7 °C 
Maximum: 28.8 °C
Average: 26.6 °C
25.5 °C29.7 °C32.1 °C
25.9 °C29.6 °C36.0 °C
24.0 °C27.2 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 36.0 °C
Average: 28.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C

Loudspeakers

The integrated speakers are sufficient for occasional background music while working, short videos, and less demanding games. High frequency centric, with little mid-range and hardly any bass, describes the acoustic characteristics, and will lead more demanding users to quickly reach for external speakers and headphones, which immediately provide a significantly improved listening experience.

Battery Life

The internal power source in the Eee PC 1215N is a 6-cell battery with a capacity of 56 Wh. This has to serve a power consumption from 11.1 Watts up to 31.3 Watts, which are primarily supplied to the Atom D525 CPU and the Nvidia Ion 2 graphics chip. The difference we determined in the power consumption between the Intel GMA, and the Nvidia Ion 2, lies at about 8.4 Watts with a medium load.

Readers Test
Maximale Akkulaufzeit (Readers Test)
Classic Test Intel
Minimale Laufzeit Intel (Classic Test)
Classic Test Nvidia
Minimale Laufzeit Nvidia (Classic Test)

The battery life is nevertheless altogether acceptable, since the relatively large battery provides for running times of in excess of 5 hours. Using the Battery Eater Readers test (maximum possible run time, energy saving profile, minimal display brightness, and disabled additional power consuming components), the tested device reached a run time of 351 minutes with Intel GMA.

Using the Battery Eater Classic test, the full maximum power consumption of the components including Ion 2 comes to bear, and thus gives an indication of the expected minimal battery life (including all the power consuming components, and maximum display brightness). In this case it was nevertheless still possible to work without a power supply for 174 minutes.

Furthermore if the Intel GMA 3150 is used, the run time is extended to 220 minutes under the same circumstances. The playback of video files was possible for a period of 241 minutes, and surfing with WiFi (both maximum brightness) was possible for 284 mintues.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
5h 51min
WiFi Surfing
4h 44min
DVD
4h 01min

Verdict

Asus has packed high performance components for Netbook standards into a solid case with the Eee PC 1215N, and provides good solutions in many areas. This includes the distribution of interfaces, the low emission characteristics, and within limits the mobility including the battery life. The performance is good for this category of Netbook, and master a large proportion of common home user tasks with ease. As far as games are concerned, the Eee PC is merely suitable for the entry level gamer playing less demanding titles. Unfortunately a low contrast and brightness display with a reflective surface was adopted, which severely limits the possible areas of use. The price also appears to be a little bit high in light of the fact that there are currently CULV notebooks available at a retail price of in the region of 500 Euros.

In Review: Asus Eee PC 1215N
In Review: Asus Eee PC 1215N

Specifications

Asus Eee PC 1215N
Processor
Intel Atom D525 1.8 GHz
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA ION 2 - 512 MB, Core: 475 MHz, nvlddmkm 8.17.12.5741 Forceware 257.41 Win7
Memory
2048 MB 
, 2x 1GB PC3-10600s, maximum 4 GB, 2 slots
Display
12.1 inch 16:9, 1366x768 pixel, Hannstar HSD121PHW1, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel NM10
Harddisk
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 ST9250315AS, 250 GB 
5400 rpm
Soundcard
Realtek ALC269 @ Intel NM10 ICH
Connections
3 USB 2.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Headphones, micrphone, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC,
Networking
Atheros AR8152 PCI-E Fast Ethernet Controller (10/100MBit), Broadcom 802.11n (a b g n ), 3.0 Bluetooth
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 37 x 296 x 203 ( = 1.46 x 11.65 x 7.99 in)
Weight
1.53 kg ( = 53.97 oz) Power Supply: 210 g ( = 7.41 oz)
Battery
56 Wh Lithium-Ion, 6 Cells, 10.95V, 5200mAh
Price
500 Euro
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium 32 Bit
Additional features
Webcam: 0.3 MP, 24 Months Warranty

 

[+] compare
The Eee PC 1215N has matte surfaces...
The Eee PC 1215N has matte surfaces...
2x 2 GB DDR3 RAM modules are included.
2x 2 GB DDR3 RAM modules are included.
Other access is not available.
Other access is not available.
The RAM access is fixed with a screw under a rubber cover.
The RAM access is fixed with a screw under a rubber cover.
The hinges hold the display without difficulties.
The hinges hold the display without difficulties.
The battery is flush with the rear.
The battery is flush with the rear.
Decent status LEDs on the front.
Decent status LEDs on the front.
High performance Netbook components.
High performance Netbook components.
The CardReader is positioned well for easy access.
The CardReader is positioned well for easy access.
The VGA output offers a good picture with 1280x1024, as well as the HDMI thanks to digital connectivity.
The VGA output offers a good picture with 1280x1024, as well as the HDMI thanks to digital connectivity.
The webcam can be switched on and off with a sliding switch.
The webcam can be switched on and off with a sliding switch.
On top of this the reflective surface requires consideration for the seating position.
On top of this the reflective surface requires consideration for the seating position.
The display represents the current standard but has relatively little brightness.
The display represents the current standard but has relatively little brightness.
...but is widened by the large battery.
...but is widened by the large battery.
The view from the sides is relatively slim,...
The view from the sides is relatively slim,...
...but in return a reflective display has been adopted.
...but in return a reflective display has been adopted.
The battery offers 56 Wh of capacity.
The battery offers 56 Wh of capacity.

Similar Notebooks

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU

» Review Asus Eee PC 1015PN Netbook
Atom N550, 10.1", 1.28 kg

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight

» Review HP EliteBook 2760p-LG682EA Convertible
HD Graphics 3000, Core i5 2540M
» Review Fujitsu Lifebook P772 Subnotebook
HD Graphics 4000, Core i5 3320M
» Review Samsung 550C22-H01US Chromebook
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge), Celeron 867
» Review Asus Eee PC 1215B Netbook
Radeon HD 6250, C-Series C-50

Links

Compare Prices

Pro

+Good Netbook performance
+Very low heat dissipation
+Very quiet operating noise
+Very good distribution of interfaces
+Pleasant surfaces
+Large touchpad
+HDMI
+CUDA capability
+Large keys
 

Cons

-Reflective, low contrast and brightness display
-Hard to operate touchpad button
-High-gloss display frame
-Relatively expensive

Shortcut

What we liked

High performance Netbook combination with good features including CUDA support.

What we missed

A significantly better display. Particularly contrast, brightness, and the reflective surface are disappointing.

What surprised us

The smooth performance with Optimus and the moderate power consumption despite of the Nettop CPU, especially under full load.

The competition

Can be found in the CULV camp, and with more affordable AMD combinations that include HD4200 graphics.

Rating

Asus Eee PC 1215N
12/04/2010 v2
Tobias Winkler

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
85%
Pointing Device
86%
Connectivity
59%
Weight
91%
Battery
89%
Display
71%
Games Performance
58%
Application Performance
65%
Temperature
92%
Noise
94%
Add Points
82%
Average
80%
85%
Netbook *
Weighted Average
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Review Asus Eee PC 1215N Netbook
Author: Tobias Winkler, 2010-10-18 (Update: 2013-06- 6)