Panasonic Toughbook CF-T5
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 5 scores (from 5 reviews)
Reviews for the Panasonic Toughbook CF-T5
Source: PC Pro

Panasonic's ultraportable, semi-rugged Toughbooks may be small and light enough to be stuffed into an overnight bag, but they're no lightweights when it comes to robustness. The specially contoured lid can handle up to 100kg of pressure before the screen is threatened. And Panasonic claims the CF-T5 can withstand drops of up to 30cm on to a hard surface, without damage. Unlike fully rugged Toughbooks, they're attractive enough to avoid curious glances too. Your only choice if you need a tough, rather than fully rugged, ultraportable notebook.
eher kurz gehaltener Test; online abrufbar
4 von 6, Leistung gut, Display schlecht, Akkulaufzeit gut
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/10/2006
Rating: Total score: 67% performance: 80% display: 40%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Notebookjournal

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/20/2007
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 70% features: 30% display: 30% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 50%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 04/13/2007
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 52% features: 55% display: 55% mobility: 100% ergonomy: 89%
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% display: 60% mobility: 90%
Source: Facts

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 01/05/2007
Rating: Total score: 55%
Comment
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 950: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on Mobile Intel 945GM chipset. It is a faster clocked version of the GMA 900 and supports no hardware T&L (Transform & Lightning) accelleration (which is required for some games).
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Intel Core Solo: Single core version of the Core Duo and successor of the Intel Pentium M; Because of the 65nm reduced structure width also smaller current consumption than Pentium M (maximally 27 Watts); the performance is comparable with the equivalent clocked Pentium M (somewhat faster because of a few improvements).
U1400: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.