Deutsch
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarOppo A77 5G smartphone review - High price, low resolution
Possible competitors in comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80.2 % | 10/2022 | Oppo A77 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2 | 190 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.56" | 1612x720 | |
| 80.5 % | 01/2022 | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G Dimensity 810, Mali-G57 MP2 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2400x1080 | |
| 80.3 % | 10/2022 | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 197 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 80.8 % | 07/2022 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619 | 195 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.59" | 2412x1080 |
Case and features - Angular and splash-proof
With its angular casing, the Oppo A77 5G looks modern and chic. The color options are a light blue and black, both with a matte shimmering back and a metal-look frame. The casing is made of plastic overall, but it is solidly manufactured and does not creak when twisted.
Oppo even had its smartphone certified to IPX4. However, you should not take your phone diving with you, because it is only protected against splash water.
There are two storage variants of the Oppo A77 5G:
- 64 GB mass storage / 4 GB RAM: 279 Euros (~$275) manufacturer's price
- 128 GB mass storage / 6 GB RAM: 329 Euros (~$324) manufacturer's price
You can insert two SIM cards into the phone at the same time, but you have to decide whether you want to use a second SIM or a microSD for memory expansion, since they share a slot. The card reader does not transfer data very quickly, but it is still within the range of the comparison devices.
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (10.9 - 77, n=98, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A77 5G (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
Communication, software and operation - Stable WLAN on the Oppo phone
The Oppo A77 5G is, as the name suggests, a 5G phone that only supports sub-6 GHz frequencies. The frequency selection is decent, but if taking a trip, you still have to see whether you can use the 4G or 5G network in the destination country.
WiFi 5 is the fastest WLAN standard that Oppo's smartphone supports. Thus, it achieves stable speeds around 350 MBit/s, which is common for this class.
Oppo installs its own UI ColorOS, which is based on Android 12. The security patches are from September 2022 and thus still fairly up-to-date at the time of testing. A few advertising apps are preinstalled.
The slightly recessed and elongated standby button already reveals that the fingerprint sensor is also hidden here. It works quite reliably, but it could be felt more clearly. Unlocking via face recognition also works well. However, the quick setup suggests that not much image data is collected here and that the function can be tricked quite easily.
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
Cameras - Actually only one optics
Although the Oppo A77 5G shows two large camera circles on the back, it actually only hides one camera that you can really use: Besides the main camera with 48 megapixels, there is namely only a support lens that does not take its own photos.
The main camera usually combines 4 pixels each to get more light-sensitive pixels, so it usually takes 12-megapixel photos. The pictures look quite well exposed and also sufficiently detailed for a mid-range camera.
In low light and high contrasts, the brightening in dark areas succeeds on average with quite strong image noise. The lab shows that the subject can still be guessed at an illumination of 1 lux, but details are no longer visible.
Videos can be recorded in 1080p with 30 fps at most, which is also common in the price range. Brightness adjustment and autofocus work quite well, but the latter does not manage without pumping. The picture quality is decent.
An 8-megapixel camera is found on the front. It takes decent selfies, but you should not look at the pictures in too much detail, otherwise you will notice the rather coarse structures and little detail in dark areas.
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main camera FlowerMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
Display - More pixels would have been nice
Oppo installs a bright screen with a decent contrast ratio in its phone, but unfortunately there is a catch: The resolution is only 720p, which is much lower than the Full HD screens of most similarly priced smartphones. This leads to a blurrier display and is also visible in a direct comparison.
In our measurements, the screen shows a slight bluish cast, but it manages without PWM, so everyone can use the Oppo A77 5G without headaches.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 592 cd/m²
Contrast: 1480:1 (Black: 0.4 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø5
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.57-98 Ø5.3
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.32
| Oppo A77 5G IPS, 1612x720, 6.56 | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.60 | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G PLS, 2408x1080, 6.60 | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G IPS, 2412x1080, 6.59 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -70% | 2% | 27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 50 ? -47% | 18 ? 47% | 27 ? 21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 34.8 ? -93% | 26 ? -44% | 12 ? 33% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | -14% | -21% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 592 | 504 -15% | 447 -24% | 590 0% |
| Brightness | 566 | 499 -12% | 428 -24% | 561 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 91 1% | 86 -4% | 92 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.4 | 0.72 -80% | 0.31 22% | 0.38 5% |
| Contrast | 1480 | 700 -53% | 1442 -3% | 1553 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.62 | 3.3 29% | 5.54 -20% | 5.15 -11% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.5 | 6 8% | 10.04 -54% | 10.35 -59% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.1 9% | 7.3 -62% | 7.1 -58% |
| Gamma | 2.32 95% | 2.28 96% | 2.03 108% | 2.143 103% |
| CCT | 7653 85% | 7041 92% | 8853 73% | 8540 76% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -42% /
-25% | -10% /
-17% | 6% /
-6% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.5 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33.7 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17900 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. | |||
Performance, emissions and battery life - Typical performance, good runtime
The MediaTek Dimensity 810 is a mid-range SoC and thus fits well with the Oppo A77 5G. The processor does not quite reach the performance of similarly priced smartphones, but the phone can keep up in the graphics area. The results are even quite good in the on-screen benchmarks, which is due to the 720p resolution placing fewer demands on the graphics unit.
It quickly becomes apparent that there are hardly any performance reserves in everyday use: The computing power is sufficient for simple tasks, but the Oppo A77 5G is pushed to its limits when you even want to adjust the volume during demanding apps. The installed UFS 2.2 memory transfers data quite quickly.
The maximum temperature of 43 °C (109.4 °F) under longer load is quite noticeable, but not yet unpleasant. Moreover, the SoC does not throttle even under permanent load.
The mono speaker on the bottom edge sounds a bit thin and quite treble-heavy, which is amplified when you increase the volume beyond the maximum and activate the "Ultra Volume Mode". The volume is then quite OK, but music sounds unpleasantly glaring in the ears. External audio devices can be connected via a 3.5 mm jack and Bluetooth. Numerous aptX codecs are also available for the wireless connection.
With its 5,000 mAh battery, the Oppo A77 5G is on par with comparable smartphones. It also gets good runtimes out of the battery with 17:12 hours. The maximum charging power via the included charger is 33 watts. It takes just under 2 hours until the battery is back to 100% when the battery is completely empty.
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (15 - 31, n=2) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 229, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (17 - 17, n=2) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.8 - 119, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (9.3 - 19, n=2) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 94, n=226, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 810 (6.2 - 6.2, n=2) | |
| Oppo A77 5G | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -17% | -19% | -17% | 65% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 908.5 | 964 6% | 485.1 -47% | 509.21 -44% | 758 ? -17% | 1508 ? 66% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 492.8 | 471 -4% | 487.4 -1% | 482.15 -2% | 400 ? -19% | 1118 ? 127% |
| Random Read 4KB | 182.4 | 148.8 -18% | 188.2 3% | 179.02 -2% | 154.9 ? -15% | 247 ? 35% |
| Random Write 4KB | 206.3 | 171.8 -17% | 163.1 -21% | 147.46 -29% | 176.3 ? -15% | 272 ? 32% |
Temperature
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.
Speaker
Oppo A77 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (28% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 38%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Battery life
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Samsung Galaxy A23 5G | |
| OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G | |
| Oppo A77 5G | |
| Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G | |
| Average of class Smartphone (424 - 2844, n=228, last 2 years) | |
Pros
Cons
Verdict - Fit for not too high demands
The Oppo A77 5G does its job: It can keep up with similarly priced smartphones in most areas and hardly has any real weaknesses apart from the low-resolution screen and the meager speaker. At the same time, you should not expect too much passion: The Oppo A77 5G is a solid worker without big ambitions to be something special.
Only the software and the angular design show a bit of originality. Oppo has even afforded an IP certification, but that is probably more for marketing purposes since it is only about protection against splash water.
If you are looking for a stylish phone with stable Wi-Fi, modern Bluetooth and good runtimes, you can give the Oppo A77 5G a chance. However, you should also keep the slightly higher prices in mind compared to the storage configuration and look for good offers
The Oppo A77 5G is a solid mid-range phone in many areas, but you have to cope with the higher price and the low-resolution screen.
If you are looking for alternatives, you will get the cheaper Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G, a phone with an even longer battery life and even stereo speakers. If you like ColorOS, you can also look at the OnePlus Nord CE 2 Lite 5G which offers a bit more performance and a higher-resolution display.
Price and availability
The Oppo A77 5G is available on the Internet from many retailers in both memory versions.
You should compare the prices: The version with 64 GB mass storage costs at our lender cyberport.de at the time of testing, but is already available at amazon.de for a favorable 239 Euros (~$236).
The 128 GB variant is available at cyberport.de for 322 Euro (~$318), at amazon.de it costs 276 Euro (~$272).
Oppo A77 5G
-
10/22/2022 v7
Florian Schmitt
Pricecompare
