Notebookcheck Logo

Maxdata Belinea o.book 4

Specifications

Maxdata Belinea o.book 4
Maxdata Belinea o.book 4
Display
12.10 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
2 kg ( = 70.55 oz / 4.41 pounds), Power Supply: 0 g ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
1200 Euro

 

Pricecompare

Average Score: 81.25% - good
Average of 4 scores (from 7 reviews)
price: 76%, performance: 63%, features: 60%, display: 47% mobility: 82%, workmanship: 77%, ergonomy: 53%, emissions: 80%

Reviews for the Maxdata Belinea o.book 4

80% Belinea o.book 4 laptop review
Source: Tech Advisor English Archive.org version
With a sub-£700 asking price, the Belinea o.book 4 is a reasonable if not exactly stand out machine. It's fast enough to handle most things you're likely to throw at it provided you don't want to play games and it's pleasant enough to look at. It offers little in the way of surprises - HDMI is about as unexpected as it gets - but the Belinea o.book 4 is a good, dependable machine.
gut, Preis zufriedenstellend, Leistung zufriedenstellend
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/25/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 70%

Foreign Reviews

80% Belinea o.book 4
Source: Notebookjournal German DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/09/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 50% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70% emissions: 80%
Weiß, kompakt und schick
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 7-8 German
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/23/2008
Rating: mobility: 90%
MAXDATA Belinea o.book 4 Subnotebook
Source: Minitechnet German DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/18/2008
Rating: performance: 80% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60% ergonomy: 40%
80% Belinea o.book4
Source: Notebookjournal German DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/27/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 70% performance: 50% features: 50% display: 50% mobility: 70% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 50%
85% Kleine, schnelle Rechenkünstler
Source: PC Go - 5/08 German
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 05/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 80% features: 80% mobility: 80%
Oho statt oh oh
Source: mobile Zeit - 3/08 German
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/09/2008
Rating: price: 80%

Comment

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM chipset. It is the successor of GMA 950 and features a fully programmable pipeline (supports Aero Glass fully and DirectX 10 with newest drivers). The peformance of the X3100 is clearly better than the GMA 950, still demanding modern games won't run fluently.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.


Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.


T7100: Entry level to mid-range (at the time of annoucement) dual core processor based on the Merom core.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.


12.10":

This range of display format is largely the upper limit for tablets and the lower limit for subnotebooks.

The advantage of subnotebooks is that the entire laptop can be small in size and therefore easily portable. The tiny display has the added advantage of requiring little power, which further improves battery life and thus mobility. The disadvantage is that reading texts is exhausting for the eyes. High resolutions, which one is used to from a standard laptop, are almost not usable.

The same applies to tablets in this size range.

» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.


81.25%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.


» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

 

Please share our article, every link counts!

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Averatec 2700
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T5800
Medion S2210
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Pentium Dual Core T3200
Packard Bell EasyNote BG45-U-300
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Pentium Dual Core T2390
MSI Megabook VR201
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Pentium Dual Core T2330
Medion MD96652
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T5450
Acer Aspire 2920
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T5450
Acer Aspire 2920Z
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Pentium Dual Core T2310
Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo Mobile U9200
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T7700

Devices with the same GPU and/or Screen Size

Fujitsu-Siemens LifeBook P8020
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo SU9400, 1.3 kg
Panasonic Toughbook CF-T7
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo U7500, 1.4 kg
Fujitsu-Siemens LifeBook P8010
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo L7100, 1.3 kg
Panasonic Toughbook CF-W7
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo U7500, 1.3 kg

Devices with the same GPU

Getac B300
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo L7500, 13.30", 3.5 kg
HP Voodoo ENVY133
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo SP7500, 13.30", 1.7 kg
Dell Inspiron 1318
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Pentium Dual Core T2390, 13.30", 2.2 kg
Dell Inspiron 13
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T8300, 13.30", 2.3 kg
Toshiba Satellite U400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T5550, 13.30", 1.9 kg
Toshiba Portégé M800
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T5750, 13.30", 1.9 kg
Toshiba Satellite Pro U400
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T8100, 13.30", 1.9 kg
Lenovo IdeaPad U110
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo L7500, 11.10", 1.1 kg
Toshiba Satellite U405
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T8100, 13.30", 2.5 kg
Medion MD96619
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T7250, 13.00", 2.1 kg
Panasonic Toughbook CF-R7
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo U7600, 10.40", 0.9 kg
Toshiba Satellite Pro U300
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T7250, 13.30", 2 kg
Sony Vaio VGN-SZ71WN
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T9300, 13.30", 1.8 kg
Toshiba Satellite U300-13V
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T7700, 13.30", 2 kg
Lenovo ThinkPad X300
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo L7100, 13.30", 1.51 kg
Toshiba Satellite U300-134
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T5450, 13.30", 2 kg
Medion MD96544
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100, Core 2 Duo T7700, 13.30", 2.1 kg
Preisvergleich

 

Price comparison

Reviews on Laptops at Ciao

Maxdata Belinea o.book 4
Maxdata Belinea o.book 4
Stefan Hinum, 2008-04-12 (Update: 2012-05-26)