Asus K51AC-SX038V
Specifications
Asus K51AC-SX038V (K51 Series)
Processor
AMD Athlon X2 QL-65 2 x 2.1 GHz, Lion
Graphics adapter
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 1366 x 768 pixel, glossy: yes
Weight
2.7 kg ( = 95.24 oz / 5.95 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)
Price
500 Euro
Price comparison
Average Score:
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
Average of 2 scores (from 2 reviews)
price: 70%, performance: 59%, features: 62%, display: 55% mobility: 48%, workmanship: 76%, ergonomy: 70%, emissions: - %
Reviews for the Asus K51AC-SX038V
ASUS K51AC-SX038V
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/17/2009
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 50% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 30% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Notebookjournal
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/17/2009
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 50% features: 50% display: 30% mobility: 30% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
ASUS K51AC-SX038V – Budget-Kracher für den Heimgebrauch.
Source: Notebookinfo DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/03/2009
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 67% features: 73% display: 80% mobility: 66% workmanship: 81%
Source: Notebookinfo
DE→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/03/2009
Rating: Total score: 74% performance: 67% features: 73% display: 80% mobility: 66% workmanship: 81%
Comment
ATI Radeon HD 3200: Onboard (shared Memory) graphics chip (on RS780M chipset) based on the HD 2400 graphics core. It also features the UVD video engine to decode HD videos. Beware: Under Windows XP the HD 3200 may have no 2D accelleration because of a driver problem.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
QL-65: Similar to the Turion X2 CPU, but with reduced power saving functions (no deep sleep, only 2 instead of 3 P-states). Compareable to a 1.3-2.0 GHz Core 2 Duo (depending on the application).» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
