Acer Aspire 2920

Specifications

Price comparison

Reviews for the Acer Aspire 2920

70% Acer Aspire 2920-302G25Mi review
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
Overall impressions of the Acer Aspire 2920-302G25Mi are mixed. Build quality is largely good and we also liked the design, but this laptop is let down by the cramped keyboard. Although there are a good range of features for the price, it's no longer cutting-edge, and the poor screen also let it down.
3.5 von 5, Ausstattung gut, Display schlecht
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/05/2009
Rating: Total score: 70% features: 80% display: 40%

Schnittiges Design
Source: PC Video - 2/08
Das ultrakompakte Notebook sieht nicht nur gut aus, sondern hat auch das Zeug zum mobilen Schnittstudio. Mit einem Preis von unter 800 Euro ist es zudem vergleichsweise preiswert. Aspire 2920 ist ein ebenso kompaktes wie leistungsfähiges und obendrein noch günstiges Notebook.
Preis/Leistung gut, Leistung gut
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/12/2008
Rating: price: 80% performance: 80%

Foreign Reviews

80% Mobil und vielseitig
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 3-4/09
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 02/01/2009
Rating: Total score: 80%

80% Kompakt, schick und bezahlbar
Source: Notebook / Organizer / Handy - 7-8
Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 06/23/2008
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 90% performance: 80% mobility: 80%

70% EEEiner gegen alle
Source: Chip.de - 6/08
Comparison, , Long, Date: 06/01/2008
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 80% performance: 89% features: 80% display: 59% mobility: 52% ergonomy: 80%

Acer Aspire 2920-302G25Mi
Source: Tom's Hardware DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 05/21/2008
Rating: price: 80% performance: 60%

83% Test Acer Aspire 2920-5A2G16Mi Notebook
Source: Notebookcheck DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/29/2008
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 68% display: 87% mobility: 83% workmanship: 82% ergonomy: 81% emissions: 85%

Klein aber oho
Source: Connect - 5/08
Comparison, , Length Unknown, Date: 04/07/2008
Rating: price: 80%

76% Klein aber oho
Source: Connect - 5/08
Comparison, , Medium, Date: 04/07/2008
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 89% features: 82% mobility: 70% ergonomy: 67%

Comment

Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100: Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) X3100 is an integrated (onboard) graphic chip on a Mobile Intel 965GM chipset. It is the successor of GMA 950 and features a fully programmable pipeline (supports Aero Glass fully and DirectX 10 with newest drivers). The peformance of the X3100 is clearly better than the GMA 950, still demanding modern games won't run fluently.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

Intel Core 2 Duo: This is the Core Duo and Core Solo successor with a longer pipeline and 5-20% more speed without more power consumption. As an addition to the Core Duo design there exists a fourth decoder, an amplified SSE-unit and an additional arithmetical logical unit (ALU).

The Core 2 Duo for laptops is identical to the desktop Core 2 Duo processors but the notebook-processors work with lower voltages (0.95 to 1188 Volt) and a lower Frontside bus clock (1066 vs 667 MHz). The performance of equally clocked notebooks is 20-25% lower than Desktop PCs because of the lower Frontside bus clock and the slower hard disks.

T5450: » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU and/or Screen Size

Devices with the same GPU