Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Samsung Xclipse 950

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Samsung Xclipse 950

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 950

The Samsung Xclipse 950 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2500 SoC. It is based on an RDNA 3 architecture including ray tracing support. It uses 8 WGPs (compared to 6 in the previous generation Xclipse 940) and offers 28% faster ray tracing in hardware.

The Exynos 2500 is manufactured in the 3nm GAA process at Samsung.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940Samsung Xclipse 950
Xclipse 900 Series
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Xclipse 950 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm3 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 09.10.2023
Pipelines8 - unified
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Steel Nomad Light
min: 1821     avg: 1919     median: 1919 (4%)     max: 2017 Points
2294 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13765     median: 13472.5 (7%)     max: 15464 Points
20027 Points (10%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4172     median: 4188.5 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
5151 Points (6%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay
min: 6649     avg: 8042     median: 8361 (4%)     max: 8797 Points
11178 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Solar Bay Extreme
937 Points (20%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32.5     median: 33 (12%)     max: 34 fps
33 fps (12%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 79.3     median: 79.5 (14%)     max: 89 fps
77 fps (14%)
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 159.8     median: 155 (11%)     max: 176 fps
189 fps (14%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 134.5     median: 134.5 (13%)     max: 139 fps
178 fps (17%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 231     median: 229.5 (5%)     max: 251 fps
281 fps (6%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 296.8     median: 299.5 (12%)     max: 319 fps
411 fps (17%)
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388     median: 385.5 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 950
499 fps (4%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 652246     median: 649947 (45%)     max: 695509 Points
597510 Points (41%)
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
336 fps (8%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU OpenCL
min: 13590     avg: 16104     median: 16919 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
19473 Points (5%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16689     median: 16082.5 (4%)     max: 18578 Points
19956 Points (5%)
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.7     median: 11.8 (5%)     max: 13.2 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 950 → 122% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
56.2 58 59 60 ~ 58 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 50.8 58 59 ~ 54 fps
106%
Xclipse 950:
57  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
59.1 81 90 90 ~ 80 fps
111%
Xclipse 950:
89  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 58.8 60 60 ~ 59 fps
102%
Xclipse 950:
60  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
39.2 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
100%
Xclipse 950:
40  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps
101%
Xclipse 950:
115  fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 950 → 104%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 102%

Samsung Xclipse 940Samsung Xclipse 950
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact585457
PUBG Mobile805940896040
Dead Trigger 2114115
Samsung Xclipse 940Samsung Xclipse 950
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps

1





2

2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 15. 12:14:22

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 13074 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1763205262s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 13 Nov 2025 05:21:34 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.011s ... 0.012s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.012s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.012s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.017s ... 0.028s

#9 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.008s ... 0.036s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 13074 +0s ... 0.036s

#11 got single benchmarks 13074 +0.004s ... 0.04s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.054s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.054s

#15 Got 28 rows for game benchmarks. +0.012s ... 0.067s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.067s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.067s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.068s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.068s

#20 return log +0.001s ... 0.069s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)