Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Xclipse 940 vs Qualcomm Adreno 720

Samsung Xclipse 940

► remove from comparison Samsung Xclipse 940

The Samsung Xclipse 940 is a graphics chip for smartphones and tablets, integrated in the Samsung Exynos 2400 SoC (iGPU). It is based on the AMD RDNA 3 architecture and includes hardware ray tracing support. #

The performance is similar or slightly better than the older Adreno 740 in the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2.

The Exynos 2400 is the first Exynos processor to use a Fan-out Wafer Level Package (FOWLP) to boost thermal management.

The SoC is manufactured in the 4nm process at Samsung.

Qualcomm Adreno 720

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 720

The Adreno 720 is a graphics unit for smartphones and tablets, which was first used in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 was installed. The chip was introduced at the end of 2023 and is primarily used in Android-based upper mid-range devices.

HDR gaming with 10-bit color depth is possible with the graphics chip, and the Adreno 720 also supports the APIs OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0 FP and Vulkan 1.3.

The GPU is capable of driving WFHD+ displays at up to 168 Hz and 4K displays at 60 Hz and offers support for HDR10+, HLG and Dolby Vision.

show full text
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 720
Adreno 700 Series
Xclipse 950 compare 8
Xclipse 940
Xclipse 920 compare 192 @ 0.56 GHz
Adreno 750 compare
Adreno 740 compare
Adreno 735 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 732 compare
Adreno 730 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 725 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 720 @ 0.8 GHz
Adreno 710 compare @ 0.8 GHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
technology4 nm4 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement09.10.2023 17.11.2024
Core Speed800 (Boost) MHz
APIDirectX 12, OpenGL ES 3.2
CPU in Xclipse 940GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Samsung Exynos 240010 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
Samsung Exynos 2400e10 x 2000 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 720GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 38 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 15466     avg: 17363     median: 17362.5 (75%)     max: 19259 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 34989     avg: 35721     median: 35720.5 (79%)     max: 36452 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
min: 15675     avg: 16588     median: 16451 (69%)     max: 17638 Points
6876 Points (29%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
min: 23545     avg: 25100     median: 25121 (63%)     max: 26633 Points
11069 Points (28%)
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
min: 12652     avg: 13199     median: 13098 (7%)     max: 13847 Points
min: 5434     avg: 5658     median: 5535 (3%)     max: 6006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3933     avg: 4182     median: 4235 (5%)     max: 4378 Points
min: 1451     avg: 1507     median: 1488 (2%)     max: 1583 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 30     avg: 32     median: 32 (12%)     max: 34 fps
min: 11     avg: 11.7     median: 12 (4%)     max: 12 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 69     avg: 77.7     median: 75 (13%)     max: 89 fps
min: 23     avg: 25.3     median: 26 (5%)     max: 27 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 153     avg: 161     median: 154 (11%)     max: 176 fps
min: 57     avg: 63     median: 66 (5%)     max: 66 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 130     avg: 133.3     median: 131 (12%)     max: 139 fps
57 fps (5%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 214     avg: 224.3     median: 215 (5%)     max: 244 fps
min: 84     avg: 90.5     median: 90.5 (2%)     max: 97 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 269     avg: 289.3     median: 289 (12%)     max: 310 fps
min: 107     avg: 119     median: 119 (5%)     max: 131 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Samsung Xclipse 940
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 378     avg: 388.3     median: 384 (3%)     max: 403 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 720
min: 174     avg: 194     median: 194 (2%)     max: 214 fps
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
236226 Points (24%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 GPU
min: 613580     avg: 637825     median: 617384 (49%)     max: 682510 Points
min: 218125     avg: 245425     median: 245424 (20%)     max: 272724 Points
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
min: 239     avg: 245.7     median: 249 (6%)     max: 249 fps
min: 60.7     avg: 67.9     median: 67.9 (2%)     max: 75.09 fps
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU OpenCL
min: 16906     avg: 16942     median: 16932 (4%)     max: 16987 Points
3465 Points (1%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 GPU Vulkan
min: 16011     avg: 16059     median: 16078 (4%)     max: 16087 Points
4066 Points (1%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 24724     avg: 27187     median: 27186.5 (9%)     max: 29649 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 37697     avg: 43989     median: 43989 (73%)     max: 50281 Points
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 10.2     avg: 11.5     median: 11 (4%)     max: 13.2 Watt
5.2 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 720 → 38% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Genshin Impact

Genshin Impact

2020
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
58 59 60 ~ 59 fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
47 58 59 ~ 55 fps
91%
Adreno 720:
50.1  fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Xclipse 940:
81 90 90 ~ 87 fps
66%
Adreno 720:
57.7  fps
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
57 60 60 ~ 59 fps
97%
Adreno 720:
57.5  fps
ultra
100%
Xclipse 940:
40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
97%
Adreno 720:
38.7  fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Xclipse 940:
105 119 119 ~ 114 fps

Average Gaming Samsung Xclipse 940 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 720 → 88%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 88%

Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 720
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
Genshin Impact595550.1
PUBG Mobile87594057.757.538.7
Dead Trigger 2114
Samsung Xclipse 940Qualcomm Adreno 720
lowmed.highultraQHD4Klowmed.highultraQHD4K
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




1
1

2







< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1





1


2







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 13. 15:26:25

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12422 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12490 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755091585s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 13 Aug 2025 05:19:07 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.035s ... 0.035s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.035s

#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.035s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12422 +0.012s ... 0.047s

#9 got single benchmarks 12422 +0.006s ... 0.053s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12490 +0s ... 0.054s

#11 got single benchmarks 12490 +0.007s ... 0.061s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.061s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.015s ... 0.076s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.076s

#15 Got 22 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.082s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.082s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.083s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.001s ... 0.084s

#19 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.084s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.085s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)