Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm QCM6490

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 778G+ 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (SDM778G Plus 5G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster with four cores based on the ARM Cortex-A78 architecture with up to 2.5 GHz and a power efficiency cluster with four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.9 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds. Compared to the older non-plus variant, the 778G+ offers 100 MHz higher clocked CPU cores.

Thanks to the new Cortex-A78 cores, the CPU performance increases by up to 40% compared to the old Snapdragon 768G according to Qualcomm. In our benchmarks, the 778G+ is able to reach the performance of the old high end chip Kirin 990

The integrated X53 5G modem supports up to 3.3 Gbps with sub 6Ghz. The FastConnect 6900 Wi-Fi modem supports the current Wi-Fi 6e standard with 6GHz.

The integrated Qualcomm Adreno 642L offers a 40% higher performance compared to the old Adreno 620 in the predecessor. This is partly thanks to the fast memory controller with LPDDR5-3200 support.

The integrated 6th gen AI engine called Hexagon 770 offers a 2x improvement and up to 12 TOPS of performance. The Spectra 570 ISP (image signal processor) supports up to three cameras. The satellite system supports all major standards like Beidou, Galileo, GLONASS and GPS.

The G specifies an optimized SoC for gaming and e.g. Qualcomm offers updates for the graphics driver.

The Snapdragon 778G Plus is manufactured in the modern 6 nm process at TSMC (vs the 5LPE of the 780G).

MediaTek Dimensity 1080

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 1080

The Mediatek Dimensity 1080 is a mid-range ARM SoC (system-on-a-chip) that can be used in both smartphones and tablets (mainly Android). The SoC integrates two ARM Cortex-A78 cores with up to 2.6 GHz for demanding tasks and six power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores with clock rates of up to 2 GHz.

The chip has an integrated sub-6 GHz 5G modem including dual-SIM support that can reach a maximum download speed of up to 2.77 Gbit/s. Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) is supported as well as Bluetooth 5.2.;

The memory controller copes with LPDDR4x or LPDDR5 working memory as well as UFS 3.1 mass storage. As an integrated graphics card, the SoC uses the ARM Mali-G68 MC4, which supports displays with 120 Hz as well as HDR10+ at a maximum resolution of 2,520 x 1,440 pixels.

The differences to the Dimensity 920 are minor, only the slightly higher maximum clock and a support for higher-resolution cameras can be found.

The MediaTek Dimensity 1080 is still manufactured in 6 nm.

Qualcomm QCM6490

► remove from comparison Qualcomm QCM6490

The Qualcomm QCM6490 is an upper mid-range SoC and is based on the Snapdragon 778G, but this variant is an extended-life chipset. The QCM6490 is being used for the first time in the Android smartphone Fairphone 5, but has actually been designed for corporate use and IoT applications.

The Kyro 670 CPU consists of a total of eight cores, which are divided into three clusters. The first cluster consists of just one high-performance core (Kyro Gold Plus, Cortex-A78), which operates at up to 2.71 GHz. The second cluster contains three further Cortex-A78 cores (Kyro Gold), each clocking at up to 2.40 GHz. The remaining four power-saving cores (Kyro Silver, Cortex-A55) are located in the last cluster and operate at up to 1.96 GHz. For the graphics calculations, an Adreno 643 with 812 MHz is integrated.

The QCM6490 SoC has an integrated 5G modem that supports both 5G-Sub6 and 5G-mmWave. In theory, this enables data rates of up to 3.7 Gbit/s downlink and 2.5 Gbit/s upload. Wi-Fi 6E is also on board, which supports the 6 GHz band.

The SoC is manufactured using the 6 nm process.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5GMediaTek Dimensity 1080Qualcomm QCM6490
CodenameKryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)Cortex-A78 / A55Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM64901.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G « 1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G 5G1.9 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm QCM6490 « 1.96 - 2.71 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G1.9 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 4G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 670 (Cortex-A78/A55)
Clock1900 - 2500 MHz2000 - 2600 MHz1960 - 2710 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm6 nm6 nm
FeaturesAdreno 642L GPU, X53 5G Modem, Hexagon 770 DSP, Spectra 570L ISP, Wi-Fi 6E2x ARM Cortex-A78 (2.6 GHz), 6x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G68 MC4, 5G NR Sub-6 GHz, LTEDual-Band GNSS, AI Engine (Gen. 6), Hexagon 770, Sensing Hub (Gen. 2), FastConnect 6900, Bluetooth 5.2, Spectra 570L ISP; LPDDR5 (3200 MHz) / LPDDR4x (2133 MHz)
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 642LARM Mali-G68 MP4Qualcomm Adreno 643 (812 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comi.mediatek.comwww.qualcomm.com

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4518     avg: 4659     median: 4547 (43%)     max: 4912 Points
min: 4047     avg: 4229     median: 4229 (40%)     max: 4411 Points
4960 Points (47%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
4732 Points (54%)
4053 Points (46%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
1066 Points (26%)
954 Points (23%)
1129 Points (27%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
2909 Points (11%)
2229 Points (9%)
2999 Points (12%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
min: 968     avg: 999     median: 998.5 (32%)     max: 1029 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
min: 2201     avg: 2349     median: 2349 (10%)     max: 2497 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 813     avg: 821     median: 824 (31%)     max: 826 Points
min: 761     avg: 769     median: 765 (29%)     max: 782 Points
870 Points (33%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2872     avg: 2933     median: 2929 (5%)     max: 2998 Points
min: 2035     avg: 2130     median: 2041 (4%)     max: 2315 Points
2944 Points (5%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
786 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2342 Points (7%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3758     avg: 3760     median: 3760 (38%)     max: 3762 Points
min: 3722     avg: 3755     median: 3754.5 (37%)     max: 3787 Points
3822 Points (38%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11089     avg: 11342     median: 11342 (11%)     max: 11595 Points
min: 8568     avg: 8894     median: 8894 (9%)     max: 9220 Points
11172 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3632     avg: 3641     median: 3640.5 (40%)     max: 3649 Points
3585 Points (40%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10488     avg: 10675     median: 10674.5 (14%)     max: 10861 Points
8800 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 10323     avg: 11834     median: 11833.5 (19%)     max: 13344 Points
10840 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2966     avg: 3441     median: 3440.5 (52%)     max: 3915 Points
3670 Points (55%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1236.1     avg: 1456     median: 1335 (2%)     max: 1796.1 ms
min: 1746.5     avg: 1770     median: 1766.4 (2%)     max: 1796.7 ms
1102 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 24488     avg: 29797     median: 32109 (24%)     max: 32794 Points
min: 25154     avg: 29552     median: 31662 (23%)     max: 31839 Points
38966 Points (29%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 69     avg: 85     median: 93 (26%)     max: 93 Points
min: 71     avg: 77.3     median: 74 (20%)     max: 87 Points
116 Points (32%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 102     avg: 115     median: 116 (21%)     max: 127 Points
min: 99     avg: 105     median: 102 (18%)     max: 114 Points
151 Points (27%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 553328     avg: 564791     median: 558781 (27%)     max: 582264 Points
min: 458379     avg: 465350     median: 465350 (23%)     max: 472321 Points
597212 Points (29%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 138027     avg: 154764     median: 162368 (40%)     max: 163897 Points
min: 120607     avg: 125961     median: 125960 (31%)     max: 131314 Points
172629 Points (43%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 QCM6490 +
676317 Points (22%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 QCM6490 +
225658 Points (23%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 6225     avg: 6514     median: 6514 (1%)     max: 6803 Points
5411 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 30076     avg: 30829     median: 30828.5 (14%)     max: 31581 Points
min: 18538     avg: 22226     median: 22225.5 (10%)     max: 25913 Points
26398 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11662     avg: 13225     median: 12820 (47%)     max: 15194 Points
min: 11721     avg: 12016     median: 11763 (43%)     max: 12564 Points
11866 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
6971 Points (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
11690 Points (76%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
44.3 MB/s (30%)
43.8 MB/s (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
750 MB/s (21%)
714 MB/s (20%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
31.5 MB/s (15%)
24.8 MB/s (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
859 MB/s (21%)
104%
1 QCM6490 +
889 MB/s (22%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 730     avg: 741     median: 732 (27%)     max: 760 Points
min: 657     avg: 665     median: 665 (25%)     max: 672 Points
794 Points (30%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 4.05     avg: 4.6     median: 4.4 (2%)     max: 5.36 Watt
min: 3.64     avg: 3.8     median: 3.7 (2%)     max: 3.94 Watt
4.6 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 0.9     median: 1.1 (1%)     max: 1.58 Watt
min: 1.147     avg: 1.3     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.691 Watt
1.7 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G+ 5G → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 1080 → 85% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm QCM6490 → 108% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.34
log 09. 13:29:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14526 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15003 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 15537 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1760009374s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 14526 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 got single benchmarks 14526 +0.006s ... 0.011s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 15003 +0.001s ... 0.012s

#11 got single benchmarks 15003 +0.006s ... 0.018s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 15537 +0s ... 0.018s

#13 got single benchmarks 15537 +0s ... 0.019s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.019s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.029s ... 0.047s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.047s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)