Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron M P4600 vs Intel Celeron M P4500

Intel Celeron M P4600

► remove from comparison Intel P4600

The Intel Celeron P4600 is an entry level CPU for laptops. It clocks with 2 GHz and supports no TurboBoost for automatic overclocking of the CPU. Furthermore AES instructions and hyperthreading are disabled. The CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but there may be some other power saving features disabled (as the Penryn - Celeron series had). The similar clocked Pentium P6100 is a bit faster due to the larger level 3 cache and the faster QPI link. However, it has no support for VT-x Virtualization functions.

The P4600 is based on the Arrandale CPUs and therefore contains an integrated memory controller and Intel HD Graphics graphics card (both manufactured in 45nm, the CPU in 32nm). The also called GMA HD graphics in the CPU is clocked at 500MHz and is able to overclock to 766MHz due to TurboBoost (GPU only).

The performance of the CPU is relatively low, because of the low clock rate and the missing Turbo Boost and Hyperthreading. Still the performance per GHz should be a bit better than similar clocked Core 2 Duo, because of the integrated memory controller.

Intel Celeron M P4500

► remove from comparison Intel P4500

The Intel Celeron P4500 is an entry level CPU for laptops. It clocks with 1.68 GHz and supports no TurboBoost for automatic overclocking. Furthermore AES instructions and hyperthreading are disabled. The CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but there may be some other power saving features disabled (as the Penryn - Celeron series had).

The P4500 is based on the Arrandale CPUs and therefore contains an integrated memory controller and Intel HD Graphics graphics card (both manufactured in 45nm, the CPU in 32nm). The also called GMA HD graphics in the CPU is clocked at 500MHz and is able to overclock to 766MHz due to Turbo Boost (GPU only).

The performance of the CPU is relatively low, because of the low clock rate and the missing Turbo Boost and Hyperthreading. Still the performance per GHz should be a bit better than similar clocked Core 2 Duo, because of the integrated memory controller.

ModelIntel Celeron M P4600Intel Celeron M P4500
SeriesIntel Celeron MIntel Celeron M
CodenameArrandaleArrandale
Series: Celeron M Arrandale
» Intel Celeron M P46002 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M P45001.86 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M U3600 compare1.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M U3400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M P46002 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron M P45001.86 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M U3600 compare1.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron M U3400 compare1.06 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock2000 MHz1860 MHz
FSB25002500
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors382+177 Million382+177 Million
32 nm32 nm, 0.8-1.4 (High Frequency Mode) 0.775 - 1 (Low Frequency Mode)
Die Size81+114 mm281+114 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C
SocketPGA988PGA988
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron M P4600Intel Celeron M P4500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.3 Points (2%)
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
1886 Points (17%)
2533 Points (23%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
4213 Points (6%)
4826 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 P4600 +
5146 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 P4600 +
2122 Points (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1081 s (13%)
1141 s (13%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
34.3 s (7%)
37.1 s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 P4600 +
1804 Points (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
32 s (7%)
24 s (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
74 s (3%)
56 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1787 s (8%)
1284 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 P4500 +
15781 MIPS (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 P4500 +
10767 MFLOPS (8%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 P4600 +
5.7 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M P4600 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron M P4500 → 105% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 02. 18:40:53

#0 checking url part for id 1047 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 727 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0.001s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.008s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#10 composed specs +0s ... 0.008s

#11 did output specs +0s ... 0.008s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 1047 +0.001s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 got single benchmarks 1047 +0.007s ... 0.016s

#15 getting avg benchmarks for device 727 +0s ... 0.016s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#17 got single benchmarks 727 +0.005s ... 0.022s

#18 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.022s

#20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.023s

#22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.024s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#28 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#29 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.027s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.028s

#37 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#38 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#39 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.029s

#40 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.03s

#41 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.03s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.03s

#43 return log +0.004s ... 0.034s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)