Notebookcheck Logo

Apple M4 (10 cores) vs Apple M4 (9 cores)

Apple M4 (10 cores)

► remove from comparison Apple M4 (10 cores)

The 10-core Apple M4 is an impressively fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) featuring 4 performance and 6 efficiency CPU cores along with a 16-core neural engine and a 10-core GPU that sports hardware RT support. Other noteworthy features include 7500 MT/s RAM support, USB 4 support and Thunderbolt 3 support. The M4 debuted in May 2024 as part of an iPad launch event; its 4 performance cores run at up to 4.4 GHz, representing a healthy improvement over the M3 (10-core GPU) and its 4.06 GHz top clock speed. Besides, this new chip also has 6 efficiency cores at its disposal. The M3 had to make do with 4 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores, for reference.

The 10-core M4 has a brother that delivers 10% lower multi-thread performance and 15% lower graphics performance, the 9-core M4 chip.

Architecture and Features

It appears the new CPU cores run at faster clock speeds than what the M3 was capable of while also featuring some minor architectural improvements. SME2 support seems to indicate that a heavily customized version of ARM v9.4-A microarchitecture is employed for both the performance cores and the efficiency cores. The M4 comes with with on-chip LPDDR5X-7500 RAM whereas the M3 was limited to 6400 MT/s; on the other hand, those holding their breath for Wi-Fi 7 and BT 5.4 are about to be disappointed as the new chip is limited to Wi‑Fi 6E and BT 5.3 just like the M3 was. Thunderbolt 3 and USB 4 support is onboard, just like DisplayPort support is. The updated NPU delivers up to 38 TOPS of performance for AI workloads.

Performance

The 3 nm chip is 10% to 20% faster than the M3 (10 GPU cores) in terms of multi-thread and single-thread performance. It also delivers about 10% higher multi-thread performance than the 9-core M4. This puts the 10-core part on equal footing with the Ryzen 7 7745HX, Core i7-13705H and other high-end x86 processors released in 2023 and 2024 - and it is worth highlighting that the Apple chip delivers this kind of performance at a much lower power consumption than AMD and Intel chips do.

It is also important to note that all of the tests we did involve short-term loads. The M4 is very likely to suffer from heavy throttling when subjected to long-term workloads such as gaming as there is no active cooling of any kind inside that super-thin iPad Pro case.

Graphics

Just like the 10-core GPU built into the M3, the M4 GPU (10 cores) has hardware support for ray tracing as well as mesh shading and other modern technologies. It supports external displays with resolutions as high as 6K and it can hardware-decode the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (encoding is not yet supported for AV1).

The graphics adapter runs at faster clock speeds than what the (otherwise identical) 10-core GPU built into the 9-core M4 can muster, delivering performance figures a few percentage points higher than those of the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop graphics card. It is once again important to note that the tests we did involve short-term loads only; the iGPU will probably suffer from significant throttling when performing long real-life tasks such as gaming.

Power consumption

The M4 will be confined to a very thin metal chassis with no active cooling of any kind. It makes sense to assume the chip's sustained power consumption won't go over 10 Watts, with short-term peaks of up to 20 Watts theoretically possible. We'll make sure to update this section once we do more tests on the new iPads.

Apple's official media release states that the chip is built with a "second generation 3 nm" process (most likely a TSMC process) making for very good, as of H1 2024, power efficiency.

Apple M4 (9 cores)

► remove from comparison Apple M4 (9 cores)

The 9-core Apple M4 is a rather fast ARM architecture processor (SoC) featuring 9 CPU cores, a 16-core neural engine and a 10-core GPU sporting hardware RT support. The M4 debuted in May 2024 as part of an iPad launch event; it has 3 performance cores running at a clock speed of up to 4.3 GHz and 6 efficiency cores running at much lower clock speeds whereas the M3 (10 GPU cores) had 4 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores to work with.

The faster 10-core M4 chip delivers 10% higher multi-thread performance and 15% higher graphics performance.

Architecture and Features

It appears the new CPU cores run at faster clock speeds than what the M3 was capable of and they also feature minor architectural improvements; SME2 support seems to indicate that a heavily customized version of ARM v9.4-A microarchitecture is employed for both the performance cores and the efficiency cores. The M4's comes with on-chip LPDDR5X-7500 RAM whereas the M3 was limited to 6400 MT/s; on the other hand, those holding their breath for Wi-Fi 7 and BT 5.4 connectivity are about to be disappointed as the new chip is limited to Wi‑Fi 6E and BT 5.3 just like the M3 was. Thunderbolt 3 and USB 4 support is onboard, just like DisplayPort support is. The updated NPU delivers up to 38 TOPS of performance for AI workloads.

Performance

Single-thread performance, multi-thread performance and NPU performance all got a noticeable boost compared to what we had with the M3 (10 GPU cores). The new 3 nm processor is about 11% faster than the M3 in short-term multi-thread workloads while besting every M3 series chip possible in single-thread tasks by a comfortable margin. Geekbench 6.2 Multi puts the 9-core M4 right above the Core i9-13900H and the Ryzen 7 7840HS; in fact, the M4 is just 3% slower than Intel's top-of-the-line Core Ultra 9 185H chip. A 13% to 18% single-thread performance improvement over M3 series chips is evident if we look at Mozilla's Kraken test results. Octane V2 seems to think the M4 is just 4% slower than Intel's mighty Core i9-14900HX. CrossMark results suggest the M4 is about as fast as the Core i9-13900H.

The 10-core M4 is about 10% faster in multi-thread workloads than the 9-core part is. It also delivers just slightly higher single-thread performance.

While Apple undoubtedly deserves its fair share of praise for what it managed to do here, it is important to highlight that all of the tests we did involve short-term workloads only. The M4 will suffer from heavy throttling if subjected to long-term workloads as there is no active cooling of any kind inside that super-thin iPad Pro case.

Graphics

Much like the 10-core GPU built into the M3, the M4 GPU (10 cores) has hardware support for ray tracing as well as mesh shading and other modern technologies. It supports external displays with resolutions as high as 6K and it can hardware-decode the popular AV1, HEVC and AVC video codecs (encoding is not yet supported for AV1).

As far as performance is concerned, it appears the 9-core M4's GPU runs at significantly lower clock speeds than the (otherwise the same) GPU built into the 10-core M4 chip. This leads to a disappointing situation where the former is about 10% slower than the 10-core GPU built into the M3. Still, the new graphics adapter is almost as fast as the Radeon RX 6500M and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop which is no small feat. Those buying more expensive iPad configurations with the 10-core M4 chip will get a graphics performance boost of about 15%.

Please keep in mind that the tests we did all involve short-term loads. The iGPU is very likely to suffer from heavy throttling when performing long real-life tasks such as gaming.

Power consumption

The M4 is confined to a very thin metal chassis with no active cooling of any kind, so it comes as no surprise that the chip's sustained power consumption is limited to just ~11 Watts, with short-term peaks of up to 15 Watts possible.

Apple's official media release states that the chip is built with a "second generation 3 nm" process (most likely a TSMC process) making for very good, as of H1 2024, power efficiency.

ModelApple M4 (10 cores)Apple M4 (9 cores)
SeriesApple Apple M4Apple Apple M4
Series: Apple M4
Apple M4 (10 cores) « - 4.4 GHz10 / 10 cores
Apple M4 (9 cores)9 / 9 cores
Apple M4 (10 cores) - 4.4 GHz10 / 10 cores
Apple M4 (9 cores) « 9 / 9 cores
Clock <=4400 MHz
L2 Cache4 MB
Cores / Threads10 / 10
4 x 4.4 GHz Apple M4 P-Core
6 x Apple M4 E-Core
9 / 9
3 x 4.3 GHz Apple M4 P-Core
6 x Apple M4 E-Core
TDP10 Watt11 Watt
TDP Turbo PL220 Watt15 Watt
Transistors28 Million
Technology3 nm3 nm
iGPUApple M4 10-core GPUApple M4 10-core GPU
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced

Benchmarks

Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
3715 Points (100%)
3662 Points (99%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
14690 Points (58%)
13350 Points (53%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
318.8 ms (0%)
325.6 ms (0%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
105178 Points (95%)
105035 Points (94%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
315 Points (91%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
430 Points (90%)
414 Points (86%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
1944 Points (74%)
1880 Points (72%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
9.8 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
4.2 Watt (5%)

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 (10 cores) → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Apple M4 (9 cores) → 97% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 10:03:11

#0 checking url part for id 17538 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 17540 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.036s ... 0.038s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 17538 +0.004s ... 0.041s

#7 got single benchmarks 17538 +0.007s ... 0.049s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 17540 +0.004s ... 0.053s

#9 got single benchmarks 17540 +0.007s ... 0.059s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.108s

#12 return log +0.064s ... 0.172s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)