NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G

► remove from comparison NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G

The Nvidia GeForce 9500M G is the successor of the 8600M GS as it also featuresonly 16 unified shaders (the 9600M series features 32). Compared to the8600M GS, the 9500M G has an improved PureVideo HD engine (VP3), supports Hybrid-SLI and needs less current (because of the 65nm process).

In conjunction with the Nvidia 9100M G integrated graphics, the 9500M G supports Hybrid-SLI (HybridPower and GeForceBoost). HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost uses the integrated graphics core of the 9100M G and the dedicated of the 9500M G in SLI mode to achieve better frame rates.

As the 8600M GS, the 9500M G features 16 stream processors that do the work of the former dedicated pixel- and vertex-shaders. The unified shaders of Nvidia are 1-dimensional (AMD has 5-dimensional shaders which leads to the higher number of shaders).

The desktop GeForce 9500 graphics card is not compareable to the mobile 9500M G, because it has 32 stream processors (compareable to the 9600M series).

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE

► remove from comparison

Die NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE (sometimes also called only 9500M or 9500M GM) is a combination of the Nvidia GeForce 9400M (G) chipset and a dedicated NB9M entry level graphics card (GeForce 9200M GS or 9300M GS) in GeForceBoost mode.

HybridPower is a technique to choose between the integrated and dedicated graphics core, if performance or battery runtime is needed. This works only in Windows Vista. Up to now the user has to use a tool to switch between the GPUs. Later Nvidia wants to switch automatically in the drivers. GeForceBoost uses the integrated graphics core of the 9400M G and the dedicated of the NB9M (9300M GS or 9200M GS) in SLI mode to achieve better frame rates.

The performance of the 9500M GE graphic solution depends on the SLI support of the game and the type of dediacted NB9M graphics card (clock rates and memory). Dell for example claims to reach 3300 points in 3DMark06 with a 9300M GS with 256MB GDDR3 RAM (in GeForceBoost mode). This would be as fast as slow GeForce 8600M GT cards. Still the performance in actual games may be much slower.

Furthermore, the 9500M may suffer from micro stuttering (stuttering in playable regions of 30 fps) in GeforceBoost because of different frame times.

The gaming performance of the solution should be sufficient for DirectX 9 games in medium detail settings. Demanding DirectX 10 games, like Crysis will only run in low detail settings.

The power consumption of the 9500M GE depends on the Hybid SLI setting and can reach up to 25 Watt TDP for the combination (including the chipset).

NVIDIA GeForce 9500M GNVIDIA GeForce 9500M GE
ManufacturerNVIDIANVIDIA
GeForce 9500M Series
GeForce 9500M GS compare 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 9500M G 16 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9500M GE 24 64 Bit
GeForce 9500M GS compare 32 @ 475 MHz128 Bit @ 700 MHz
GeForce 9500M G 16 @ 500 MHz128 Bit @ 800 MHz
GeForce 9500M GE 24 64 Bit
CodenameNB9PMCP79Mx + NB9M
ArchitectureG9x
Pipelines16 - unified24 - unified
Core Speed500 MHz
Shader Speed1250 MHz
Memory Speed800 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory TypeGDDR2, GDDR3GDDR2, GDDR3
Max. Amount of Memory1024 MB256 MB
Shared Memorynoyes
DirectXDirectX 10, Shader 4.0DirectX 10.0, Shader 4.0
Transistors314 Million
technology65 nm65 nm
FeaturesPCI-E 2.0
Notebook Sizemedium sized
Date of Announcement03.06.2008 09.01.2008
Link to Manufacturer Pagehttp://www.nvidia.com/object/geforce_950...

Benchmarks

3DMark 2001SE - Standard 1024x768
min: 13820     avg: 13926     median: 13926 (14%)     max: 14032 Points
3DMark 03 - Standard 1024x768
min: 8010     avg: 8034     median: 8033.5 (4%)     max: 8057 Points
3DMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 5685     avg: 5766     median: 5765.5 (11%)     max: 5846 Points
3DMark 06 1280x800 + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit + NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G

Average Benchmarks NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

Crysis - GPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
38.6  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
15.7  fps
Crysis - CPU Benchmark

Crysis - CPU Benchmark

2007
low 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
38.3  fps
med. 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
16.2  fps
F.E.A.R.

F.E.A.R.

2005
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
28 308 ~ 168 fps
med. 800x600
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
25 81 ~ 53 fps
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
18 21 ~ 20 fps
Doom 3

Doom 3

2004
low 640x480
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
88  fps
med. 640x480
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
87.8  fps
high 800x600
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
65.2  fps
ultra 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
44.1  fps
Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

Quake 3 Arena - Timedemo

1999
high 1024x768
100%
GeForce 9500M G:
158.4  fps

Average Gaming NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G → 100%

For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)