Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 302 vs Qualcomm Adreno 304

Qualcomm Adreno 302

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 302

The Qualcomm Adreno 302 is an integrated graphics card for smartphones and tablets that is used for entry-level SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 series (e. g. MSM8210). The Adreno 302 is a slightly lower clocked version of the Adreno 305. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem. The GPU offers unified shaders and supports OpenGL ES 3.0, OpenCL and DirectX 9.3.

Source: Qualcomm

Qualcomm Adreno 304

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 304 is an entry-level integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 series (e. g. MSM8909).

The Adreno 304 usually only offers half of the performance of the the Adreno 320 and is only slightly ahead of the Mali-400 MP4. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem.

As all other Adreno 30x GPUs, the Adreno 304 includes 24 ALUs (6 in other sources) that are built as unified shaders. More information on the architecture can be found on Github.

Qualcomm Adreno 302Qualcomm Adreno 304
Adreno 300 Series
Adreno 330 compare 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 330 compare 32 @ 0.45 - 0.58 GHz
Adreno 320 compare 16 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 308 compare 6
Adreno 306 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 305 compare 6 @ 0.45 GHz
Adreno 304 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Adreno 302 6 @ 0.4 GHz
Pipelines6 - unified6 - unified
Core Speed400 MHz400 MHz
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIDirectX 9.3, OpenGL ES 3.0DirectX 9.0c, OpenGL ES 3.0
technology28 nm28 nm
Date of Announcement20.06.2013 01.07.2015
CPU in Adreno 302GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82124 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 82102 x 1200 MHz? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 304GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ80094 x 1300 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM89094 x 1100 MHz400 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon Wear 31004 x ? MHz200 MHz? MHz
Qualcomm 2052 x 1100 MHz400 MHz? MHz
min. - max.200 - ? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 3543     avg: 3599     median: 3592 (0%)     max: 3678 Points
min: 2359     avg: 3958     median: 4053 (0%)     max: 5042 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1951     avg: 1991     median: 1986 (0%)     max: 2033 Points
min: 2076     avg: 2214     median: 2219.5 (0%)     max: 2341 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 4095     avg: 4219     median: 4171 (1%)     max: 4482 Points
min: 4189     avg: 4699     median: 4851 (1%)     max: 4906 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
162 Points (1%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
135 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
0 Points (0%)
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
0 fps (0%)
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
1.3 fps (0%)
min: 1     avg: 1.7     median: 1.8 (0%)     max: 1.9 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 302
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 3.3     avg: 4.1     median: 4.4 (0%)     max: 4.5 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 304
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
34.3 fps (57%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
1316 Points (3%)
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
3442 Points (8%)
0 Points (0%)
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
49.7 fps (74%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
min: 2172     avg: 2356     median: 2297 (2%)     max: 2780 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
min: 540     avg: 574     median: 584 (1%)     max: 591 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
min: 2536     avg: 2656     median: 2655.5 (58%)     max: 2775 Points
3241 Points (70%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 302 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 304 → 103% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Asphalt 8: Airborne

Asphalt 8: Airborne

2013
low
Adreno 304:
21  fps
high
Adreno 304:
13  fps
Real Racing 3

Real Racing 3

2013
low
Adreno 304:
42  fps
high
Adreno 304:
20  fps
Qualcomm Adreno 304lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Asphalt 8: Airborne2113
Real Racing 34220
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1




2











For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 29. 00:35:23

#0 checking url part for id 5509 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6449 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Mar 2024 05:37:00 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.102s ... 0.104s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.104s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.104s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 5509 +0.026s ... 0.129s

#8 got single benchmarks 5509 +0.023s ... 0.152s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6449 +0.002s ... 0.154s

#10 got single benchmarks 6449 +0.046s ... 0.2s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.2s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.043s ... 0.243s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.247s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.249s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.251s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.264s

#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.007s ... 0.271s

#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.271s

#19 Got 4 rows for game benchmarks. +0.006s ... 0.277s

#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.277s

#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.001s ... 0.278s

#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.005s ... 0.283s

#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.283s

#24 return log +0.041s ... 0.324s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)