, , , , , ,
search relation.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 212 APQ8009

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 is an entry level SoC for Android based tablets and smartphones. It contains four ARM Cortex-A7 CPU cores (quad core) with a clock rate of up to 1.3 GHz, an Adreno 304 graphics card, an LPDDR2/LPDDR3 memory controller (max. 533 MHz), a eMMC 4.5 port, but no 3G/LTE radio module.

The performance of the Cortex-A7 cores is rather low and positioned in the entry level of 2015. In our tests of the CAT S40 smartphone, daily tasks and browsing however imposed no problem for the SoC. 

The integrated Adreno 304 graphics card is clocked at 400 MHz and also positioned in the entry level. Therefore, demanding games may not run smoothly in high settings.

The integrated video engine allows the encoding and decoding of 1080p H.264 videos and decoding of H.265 videos. The main display can be driven with up to 1280x720 Pixels.

The SoC integrates Bluetooth 4.1 + BLE and 802.11n (2.4 GHz) WiFi.

The SoC is manufactured in a 28 nm LP process (at TSMC most likely). Due to the low energy consumption of the SoC it is also suited for small smartphones.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 200 MSM8212

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 is an entry level SoC for Android based tablets and smartphones. It contains four ARM Cortex-A7 CPU cores (quad core) with a clock rate of up to 1.2 GHz, an Adreno 302 graphics card, an LPDDR2 memory controller (max. 333 MHz single channel) and a 3G radio module.

The performance of the Cortex-A7 cores is rather low and positioned in the entry level of 2014. Non demanding tasks and browsing however should impose no problem for the SoC. 

The integrated Adreno 302 graphics card is clocked at around 400 MHz and also positioned in the entry level. Therefore, demanding games may not run smoothly in high settings.

The integrated video engine allows the encoding and decoding of 720p H.264 videos and decoding of H.265 videos. The main display can be driven with up to 1280x720 Pixels.

The SoC integrates Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11n (2.4 GHz) WiFi, and a 3G-Modem (UMTS/HSPA+/WCDMA, max. 42 Mbit/s, dual and triple SIM support).

The SoC is manufactured in a 28 nm LP process (at TSMC most likely). Due to the low energy consumption of the SoC it is also suited for small smartphones.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200Qualcomm Snapdragon 200
Cortex-A7Cortex-A7
Series: Snapdragon 200 Cortex-A7
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ80091.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82121.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 compare1.1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ80091.3 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM82121.2 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 compare1.1 GHz4 / 4 Cortex-A7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 Cortex-A7
1300 MHz1200 MHz
4 / 44 / 4
28 28
Bluetooth 4.1, 802.11n (2.4 GHz) WLANUSB 2.0, Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11n WLAN, 3G Modem (max. 42 Mbit/s), 1x 16 Bit Single-Channel Memory Controller
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 304 (400 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 302
ArchitectureARMARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 212 APQ8009Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 200 MSM8212

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
6539 Points (4%)
7183 Points (5%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
6517 Points (7%)
7156 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 6786     avg: 6968     median: 6968 (7%)     max: 7150 Points
7961 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
1075 (2%)
1113 (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
331 (7%)
329 (7%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
423 (5%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1118 (1%)
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Multi Thread
224 MFLOPS (8%)
min: 233.9     avg: 236     median: 234.4 (8%)     max: 238.276 MFLOPS
Linpack Android / IOS - Linpack Single Thread
55.9 MFLOPS (5%)
min: 58.5     avg: 58.9     median: 58.6 (6%)     max: 59.569 MFLOPS
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 15228.5     avg: 17580     median: 18237.4 (31%)     max: 19274.5 ms
min: 15615.8     avg: 25149     median: 27131.9 (46%)     max: 30715.7 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1254.1     avg: 1360     median: 1331 (15%)     max: 1525.9 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1948     avg: 2225     median: 2152 (3%)     max: 2574 Points
min: 1122     avg: 1431     median: 1233 (2%)     max: 1938 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 22422     avg: 26397     median: 24924 (8%)     max: 31844 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
2304 Points (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 2720     avg: 2915     median: 2914.5 (15%)     max: 3109 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 212 APQ8009 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8212 → 98% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2021, 2020
v1.16
log 25. 08:11:04

#0 checking url part for id 8007 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6469 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:09:15 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 8007 +0s ... 0.008s

#7 got single benchmarks 8007 +0.009s ... 0.016s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6469 +0s ... 0.017s

#9 got single benchmarks 6469 +0.007s ... 0.024s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.032s

#12 return log +0.004s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)