Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 1047UE vs Intel Celeron 927UE

Intel Celeron 1047UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1047UE is an ultra low voltage dual core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 1047UE should be similar fast as a Pentium 987. A TDP of 17 W allows the 1047UE to fit in small form factors.

Intel Celeron 927UE

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 927UE is an ultra low voltage single core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 927UE should be similar fast as a 2.13 GHz Celeron M 560.

ModelIntel Celeron 1047UEIntel Celeron 927UE
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
CodenameIvy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2.1 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1.9 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1.6 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE1.4 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1 GHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 927UE1.5 GHz1 / 11 MB
Clock1400 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB64 KB
L2 Cache512 KB256 KB
L3 Cache2 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 21 / 1
TDP17 Watt17 Watt
Technology22 nm22 nm
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C
SocketBGABGA
FeaturesHD Graphics (350 - 900 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$134 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Celeron 1047UEIntel Celeron 927UE

Benchmarks

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 01:53:14

#0 checking url part for id 3596 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 3594 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.003s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.002s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#18 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#19 getting avg benchmarks for device 3596 +0s ... 0.007s

#20 got single benchmarks 3596 +0s ... 0.007s

#21 getting avg benchmarks for device 3594 +0s ... 0.007s

#22 got single benchmarks 3594 +0s ... 0.007s

#23 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.007s

#24 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.007s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.008s

#26 return log +0.004s ... 0.011s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)