Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Celeron 927UE

Intel Celeron 1007U

► remove Intel 1007U

The Intel Celeron 1007U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.5 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1007U should be similar fast as a Celeron B820.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1007U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 927UE

► remove

The Intel Celeron 927UE is an ultra low voltage single core processor for embedded systems. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-900MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated. Furthermore, some power saving features may be deactivated, leading to a shorter battery runtime compared to Core i3 processors.

Due to the slow clock speed, the performance is rather limited. Compared to previous generations, the 927UE should be similar fast as a 2.13 GHz Celeron M 560.

Intel Celeron 1007UIntel Celeron 927UE
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Ivy BridgeIvy Bridge
: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1007U1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 927UE1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
1500 MHz1500 MHz
128 KB64 KB
512 KB256 KB
2 MB1 MB
2 / 21 / 1
17 17
22 22
94 mm2
105 °C100 °C
FCBGA1023BGA
HD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitIdle States, Enhanced SpeedStep, Thermal Monitoring
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)
$86 U.S.$107 U.S.
Intel Celeron 1007UIntel Celeron 927UE

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.2     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.22 Points
min: 1.2     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.22 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.6 Points (25%)
0.6 Points (25%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4962 Points (6%)
4962 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2480 Points (22%)
2480 Points (22%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1610 Points (11%)
1610 Points (11%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3440 Points (5%)
3440 Points (5%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1007U → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 927UE → 100% n=6

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)