Intel Celeron 1007U vs Intel Celeron 1037U

Intel Celeron 1007U

► remove Intel 1007U

The Intel Celeron 1007U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.5 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1007U should be similar fast as a Celeron B820.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1007U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1037U

► remove

The Intel Celeron 1037U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1037U is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1037U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1007UIntel Celeron 1037U
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Ivy BridgeIvy Bridge
: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1007U1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M compare1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1037U1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
1500 MHz1800 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
17 17
22 22
94 mm294 mm2
105 °C105 °C
FCBGA1023FCBGA1023
HD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Intel Celeron 1007UIntel Celeron 1037U

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 1.2     avg: 1.2     median: 1.2 (3%)     max: 1.22 Points
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
0.6 Points (25%)
0.8 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
4962 Points (6%)
6107 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
2480 Points (22%)
3165 Points (28%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1610 Points (11%)
1903 Points (13%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
3440 Points (5%)
4744 Points (7%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1007U → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1037U → 125% n=6

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)