Intel Celeron 1005M vs Intel Celeron 1037U

Intel Celeron 1005M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1005M is an entry-level dual-core processor clocked at 1.9 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 650-1000 MHz) and a reduced feature set compared to the faster Core processors. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are all disabled.

Compared to previous generations, the 1005M is similar in performance to a Pentium B940. Like many Ivy Bridge dual-cores, the TDP is specified at 35 W.

Intel Celeron 1037U

► remove from comparison

The Intel Celeron 1037U is an entry level, Ultra Low Voltage (ULV) dual core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz. It is based on the Ivy Bridge architecture (3rd generation Core, 22 nm) and features an integrated graphics card (Intel HD Graphics based on the HD Graphics 2500 at 350-1000MHz) and a reduced feature set (compared to the faster Core processors). E.g. Turbo Boost, AES, Hyperthreading, Virtualization VT-d, Quick Sync, Wireless Display and Clear Video HD are deactivated.

Compared to previous generations, the 1037U is just slightly slower than the 2.0 GHz Pentium B940.

The 17W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and the memory controller. Therefore, the 1037U is suited for small subnotebooks.

Intel Celeron 1005MIntel Celeron 1037U
Intel CeleronIntel Celeron
Ivy BridgeIvy Bridge
Series: Celeron Ivy Bridge
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1005M1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1037U1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
Intel Celeron 1020E compare2200 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1020M compare2100 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1005M1900 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1000M compare1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
» Intel Celeron 1037U1800 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1017U compare1600 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1007U compare1500 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1047UE compare1400 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 1019Y compare1000 MHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 927UE compare1500 MHz1 / 11 MB
1900 MHz1800 MHz
128 KB128 KB
512 KB512 KB
2 MB2 MB
2 / 22 / 2
35 17
22 22
94 mm294 mm2
105 °C105 °C
rPGA988BFCBGA1023
HD Graphics (650 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable BitHD Graphics (350 - 1000 MHz), DDR3 Memory Controller, Enhanced Speedstep, Thermal Monitoring, Execute Disable Bit
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (650 - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 1000 MHz)
$86 U.S.$86 U.S.
Intel Celeron 1005MIntel Celeron 1037U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
100%
1 1037U +
1.5 Points (3%)
Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Single 64Bit
100%
1 1037U +
0.8 Points (29%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
100%
1 1037U +
2500 Points (26%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
100%
1 1037U +
4824 Points (8%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 1037U +
6107 Points (7%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
100%
1 1037U +
3165 Points (28%)
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m *
100%
1 1037U +
1304 seconds (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - 32m *
100%
1 1037U +
41.5 seconds (8%)
WinRAR - Result
100%
1 1037U +
1276 KB/s (13%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 2
100%
1 1037U +
8.5 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - Pass 1
100%
1 1037U +
46.8 fps (16%)
TrueCrypt - Serpent Mean 100MB
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - Twofish Mean 100MB
100%
1 1037U +
0.1 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - AES Mean 100MB
100%
1 1037U +
0.2 GB/s (0%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - CPU Score
100%
1 1037U +
1903 Points (13%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - 1M *
100%
1 1037U +
21.5 Seconds (5%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - 2M *
100%
1 1037U +
47.2 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M *
100%
1 1037U +
1091 Seconds (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - Dhrystone
100%
1 1037U +
22380 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - Whetstone
100%
1 1037U +
13360 MFLOPS (10%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Processor
100%
1 1037U +
5.8 points (74%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
100%
1 1037U +
4744 Points (7%)
3DMark 11 - Performance Physics 1280x720
100%
1 1037U +
1880 points (8%)
3DMark - Ice Storm Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 1037U +
13626 Points (9%)
3DMark - Cloud Gate Standard Physics 1280x720
100%
1 1037U +
1225 Points (3%)
3DMark - Fire Strike Physics 1920x1080
100%
1 1037U +
1651 Points (5%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Stream
100%
1 1037U +
4937 Points (40%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Memory
100%
1 1037U +
4278 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Floating Point
100%
1 1037U +
3032 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Integer
100%
1 1037U +
2850 Points (6%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score
100%
1 1037U +
3408 Points (9%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 1037U → NAN% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.15
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)