Notebookcheck

Review LG P875 Optimus F5 Smartphone

Daniel Schuster (translated by Martina Osztovits), 08/01/2013

Run-of-the-mill. Avid readers know it. You will usually find a concise word describing the reviewed device here. But, what shall we do if the smartphone does not stand out from the crowd and hardly offers any distinct feature? This is the case here.

For the original German review, see here.

The Optimus F5 is an LTE capable mobile phone with 4.3-inch display. Apart from fast wireless connectivity, the data sheet gives little information about further innovations. We think that the design is boring and lacks innovations. The inner components are also not brand new. Dual-core processors with 1.2 GHz and 1 GB are common now, even in very cheap mid-range models. However, an RRP of 399 Euros (~$528) cannot be called cheap. Can we detect anything special or is the Optimus F5 a pretender?

Case

Wie wir testen - Gehäuse

The outside is completely made from plastic.
The outside is completely made from plastic.

The case of the mid-range model is completely made from plastic. The removable back cover is glossy black and has a texture that resembles a chessboard. The slots for micro SIM and micro SD card are beneath it. The back is nearly pressure resistant, but, the F5 creaks from side-to-side twisting.

At 126 x 64.46 x 9.3 mm (~5.0 x 2.5 x 0.4 inches), every dimension is bigger than the Galaxy S4 Mini's – despite identical diagonals. With 131.1 g (~4.6 ounces), our test sample is also 24.1 g (~0.9 ounces) heavier than the S4 Mini. The Optimus F5 is available in black and white.

Connectivity

Wie wir testen - Gehäuse

The four sides of the smartphone house the usual physical interfaces and buttons. External speakers can be connected to the 3.5 mm jack on the top side. The power button is on the right side towards the top. The opposite side houses the volume control at the same height. You can connect the Optimus F5 to a computer via its micro USB port on the bottom side. If the built-in storage capacity (8 GB) does not suffice your needs, you should consider buying a micro SD card. According to the manufacturer, cards with up to 32 GB are supported.

Left: volume control
Left: volume control
Under side: micro USB port
Under side: micro USB port
right: power button
right: power button
top side: 3.5 mm jack
top side: 3.5 mm jack

Software

Android 4.3 is already available – but not with the Optimus F5. The smartphone is two generations in the past and uses Android 4.1.2 (Jelly Bean). If and when a software update will be available, is not known at the moment. Since the mobile phone was only recently released, a future software update is a possibility.

Furthermore, the layout of the system settings was changed and an LG launcher preinstalled. Of course you can replace it by apps from the Google Play Store. Bloatware and several useful apps including "Backup", "SmartShare" and "Video Wiz" are preinstalled.

GPS reception
GPS reception

Communication & GPS

It is interesting that communication is possible via modern LTE band with theoretical download rates of about 100 Mbit/s. The Huawei Ascend P2 even achieves up to 150 Mbit/s with its LTE module. If LTE is not available or not included in your contract with your service provider, you can use UMTS. In home networks the smartphone can communicate via WLAN standards 802.11 b/g/n. We could not connect it with our WLAN router (Fritz!Box 7112, latest firmware), but this problem does not occur with other routers.

The GPS module works as expected. You can connect to satellites indoors and close to windows. An existing connection is stable without interruptions as long as visual contact to the satellites maintained.

Cameras & Multimedia

The test sample houses two cameras. The weaker model is above the touchscreen and features a maximum resolution of 1.2 MP. The main camera on the rear side features a 5 MP sensor and can record videos in Full HD (1080p). In addition, the main camera features a 4x digital zoom. However, you should only use it in exceptional situations.

To make comparison to other cameras easy, we shot some test pictures. The result of the rear camera is impressive. The 5 MP sensor, with relatively low resolution, achieves a decent result. Colors look realistic and the sharpness is satisfactory. In several pictures, the total brightness is lower. Therefore, heavy image noise is to be expected, if less ambient light is available (especially in closed rooms).

Apple iPhone 5
Apple iPhone 5
Apple iPhone 5
Apple iPhone 5
Apple iPhone 5
Apple iPhone 5
LG Google Nexus 4
LG Google Nexus 4
LG Google Nexus 4
LG Google Nexus 4
LG Google Nexus 4
LG Google Nexus 4
LG P875 Optimus F5
LG P875 Optimus F5
LG P875 Optimus F5
LG P875 Optimus F5
LG P875 Optimus F5
LG P875 Optimus F5
Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia Lumia 920
Nokia Lumia 920
Reference camera: Sony A57
Reference camera: Sony A57
Reference camera: Sony A57
Reference camera: Sony A57
Reference camera: Sony A57
Reference camera: Sony A57

Accessories & Warranty

The scope of delivery is standard. Apart from a modular power adapter, an in-ear headset and quick guide manuals are included.

The warranty is 24 months for the smartphone, but only 6 months for battery and power adapter.

Input Devices & Handling

Apart from the capacitive touchscreen, the Optimus F5 features three touch keys below the display. The "keys" are primarily for navigating through Android. The most important input device is the 4.3-inch screen. It supports input from multiple fingers. It reacts quickly to inputs, but there is a delay when rotating the display content. The virtual QWERTZ keyboard just about takes up 40% of the screen in portrait mode. Navigation is possible without problems. If you rotate the device by 90°, only a little space remains. Now, significantly more than 50% of the screen is covered. If you also expand the navigation bar, the visible part shrinks to about 5 mm.

Display

Wie wir testen - Display

4.7 inch display with IPS technology
4.7 inch display with IPS technology

The glossy display of the Optimus F5 has a diagonal of 10.9 cm, which is 4.3 inches. A TFT IPS color display with 16.7 million colors is used. The resolution of the mid-range device is qHD (960x540 pixels). Given the display diagonal and the resolution, the pixel density is 256 dpi. The HTC One SV and the Nokia Lumia 720 with the same display size only feature 216 dpi.

The test sample achieves a maximum brightness of 337 cd/m² in the middle of the screen. The average brightness is 317.8 cd/m². Therefore, the Optimus F5 is about 20 cd/m² brighter than the Super-AMOLED screen of the Galaxy S4 Mini. However, the test device can hardly keep up with the extremely bright Lumia 720 (579.7 cd/m²). With 87%, the Optimus F5's distribution of brightness is also by 6 percentage points better than the S4 Mini's. However, you will hardly be able to recognize this. The black value of 0.31 cd/m² is acceptable for this display technology. Luminance and black value give a contrast of 1087:1.

299
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
332
cd/m²
299
cd/m²
337
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
313
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Information
X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 337 cd/m²
Average: 317.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 337 cd/m²
Black: 0.31 cd/m²
Contrast: 1087:1

Further measurements with the CalMAN 5 software uncover a slightly blue tint and too weak red tones, which have a negative impact on color saturation. For example, "pink" looks too pale. You can easily recognize two significant deviations from the ideal gray levels. The screenshot of the gray level representation shows a significant deviation from the ideal curve.

Colors
Colors
Gray levels
Gray levels
Color saturation
Color saturation
Color Checker
Color Checker

Due to the low display brightness, it was to be expected that it is difficult to read from the screen in the sun. This is actually the case, but thanks to the high contrast, the result is just acceptable. The content is more or less legible if you turn or incline the device.

The TFT IPS display largely performs well, but we already reviewed many significantly better IPS screens in the past. Contrast and color fidelity do not remain high at the most obtuse angles. Therefore, the display content looks pale.

Modest outdoor capabilities
Modest outdoor capabilities
Viewing angles: Optimus F5
Viewing angles: Optimus F5

Performance

Wie wir testen - Leistung

Work is primarily done by a dual-core processor from Qualcomm called Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 with a clock rate of 1.2 GHz. The SoC is processed in 28 nm lithography. ARMv7 is used as platform and Adreno 305 as GPU. In theory, one gigabyte of RAM is sufficient for the smartphone, but a more powerful combination would be appropriate for an RRP of 399 Euros (~$528), e.g., the Galaxy S4 Mini's.

We ran several benchmarks to compare the actual performance to other devices. Let's start with the synthetic benchmarks. The Optimus performs decently in the Vellamo Mobile Benchmark 2.0 and only the Galaxy S4 Mini performs better in the "Metal" sub-rating. In all other tests, our test device is positioned behind the competition. Only the Galaxy S2 Plus with older hardware is always slower.

AnTuTu Benchmark v3 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
10363 Points ∼29%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
13958 Points ∼39% +35%
HTC One SV
10977 Points ∼31% +6%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
6575 Points ∼18% -37%
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Total Score (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
1281 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
1919 Points ∼15% +50%
HTC One SV
1305 Points ∼10% +2%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
890 Points ∼7% -31%
GLBenchmark 2.5
Egypt HD Fixed Time (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
21 fps ∼35%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
34 fps ∼57% +62%
HTC One SV
28 fps ∼47% +33%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
19 fps ∼32% -10%
1920x1080 Egypt HD Offscreen Fixed Time (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
8.2 fps ∼1%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
17 fps ∼3% +107%
HTC One SV
12 fps ∼2% +46%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
11 fps ∼2% +34%
Vellamo Mobile Benchmark 2.0
Metal (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
579 Points ∼32%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
671 Points ∼38% +16%
HTC One SV
514 Points ∼29% -11%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
393 Points ∼22% -32%
HTML5 (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
2116 Points ∼68%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
1998 Points ∼64% -6%
HTC One SV
1515 Points ∼49% -28%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
1535 Points ∼49% -27%

Legend

 
LG P875 Optimus F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
HTC One SV Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus Broadcom BCM28155, Broadcom VideoCore-IV, 8 GB SSD

The browser-based tests have different results. In Google's "Octane" and "Google V8 Ver. 7", the test device cannot surpass the Galaxy S4 Mini, but performs better than the Nokia Lumia 720 Windows phone. In "Peacekeeper" and "Browsermark 2.0", the results are much higher than both competitors.

Google V8 Ver. 7 - Google V8 Ver. 7 Score (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
1454 Points ∼8%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
2165 Points ∼12% +49%
HTC One SV
1174 Points ∼6% -19%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
1643 Points ∼9% +13%
Nokia Lumia 720
441 Points ∼2% -70%
Browsermark - --- (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
2376 points ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
2188 points ∼30% -8%
HTC One SV
1366 points ∼19% -43%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
1291 points ∼18% -46%
Nokia Lumia 720
1503 points ∼21% -37%
Octane V1 - Total Score (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
1193 Points ∼6%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
1958 Points ∼9% +64%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
1536 Points ∼7% +29%
Nokia Lumia 720
375 Points ∼2% -69%
Peacekeeper - --- (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
599 Points ∼10%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
530 Points ∼9% -12%
HTC One SV
416 Points ∼7% -31%
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus
553 Points ∼9% -8%
Nokia Lumia 720
218 Points ∼4% -64%

Legend

 
LG P875 Optimus F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
HTC One SV Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy S2 Plus Broadcom BCM28155, Broadcom VideoCore-IV, 8 GB SSD
 
Nokia Lumia 720 Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD

Our last benchmark, "AndroBench 3", evaluates the performance of the flash memory. Here the Optimus F5 achieves constantly very good values. The competition cannot keep up in reading or in writing.

AndroBench 3
Sequential Read 256KB (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
59.13 MB/s ∼33%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
50.88 MB/s ∼28% -14%
HTC One SV
38.59 MB/s ∼22% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S DUOS GT-S7562
30.92 MB/s ∼17% -48%
Sequential Write 256KB (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
10.18 MB/s ∼18%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
6.33 MB/s ∼11% -38%
HTC One SV
6.94 MB/s ∼12% -32%
Samsung Galaxy S DUOS GT-S7562
4.96 MB/s ∼9% -51%
Random Read 4KB (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
12.04 MB/s ∼57%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
9.37 MB/s ∼45% -22%
HTC One SV
7.84 MB/s ∼37% -35%
Samsung Galaxy S DUOS GT-S7562
7.21 MB/s ∼34% -40%
Random Write 4KB (sort by value)
LG P875 Optimus F5
1.13 MB/s ∼36%
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195
0.32 MB/s ∼10% -72%
HTC One SV
0.28 MB/s ∼9% -75%
Samsung Galaxy S DUOS GT-S7562
0.25 MB/s ∼8% -78%

Legend

 
LG P875 Optimus F5 Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini GT-I9195 Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8930AB, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
HTC One SV Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930, Qualcomm Adreno 305, 8 GB SSD
 
Samsung Galaxy S DUOS GT-S7562 Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A, Qualcomm Adreno 200,

Games & Videos

The performance in 3D games and playback of Full HD videos cannot be criticized. Modern Combat 4: Zero Hour and Need For Speed: Hot Pursuit are demanding games, but you can enjoy them as a pastime without problems. As Modern Combat 4 requires 2 GB, you might face problems during the installation. The Full HD trailers (1080p) are in the MKV container format and have a data rate of 6100 kBit/s.

Need For Speed: Hot Pursuit
Need For Speed: Hot Pursuit
FullHD trailer of Skyfall
FullHD trailer of Skyfall

Speech Quality

Our dialog partners confirmed that we were clearly audible in multiple test calls. We did not face unexpected interruptions and cannot complain about the maximum volume. However, the built-in speakerphone could be slightly louder - with increasingly better sound quality.

Emissions

Wie wir testen - Emissionen

Temperature

We could not detect unusual high temperatures throughout our tests. This is reflected by the measured temperatures. We recorded average values of 34.6 °C and 34.3 °C (94.28 and 93.74 °F) (front side, rear side) with the Voltcraft IR-350. The competitors from HTCNokia, and Samsung are on par. If the processor is not demanded, the average temperatures fall by about 2 to 3 °C (to around 90 °F). Even the power adapter remains lukewarm under full load.

Max. Load
 38.2 °C34.3 °C31.3 °C 
 39.6 °C33.7 °C31.0 °C 
 38.4 °C33.6 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 39.6 °C
Average: 34.6 °C
29.5 °C34.4 °C37.5 °C
30.1 °C35.2 °C39.2 °C
30.5 °C34.6 °C37.4 °C
Maximum: 39.2 °C
Average: 34.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  35.0 °C | Room Temperature 23.0 °C | Voltcraft IR-350

Speakers

Similar to other smartphones, the mono speaker achieves an average result. The sound is acceptable below 65% of the maximum volume, but slightly tinny. At higher volumes, the sound is distorted and the audio experience uncomfortable. If you want to listen to music or watch a film at a louder volume, you should use the 3.5 mm jack.

Energy Management

Wie wir testen - Akkulaufzeit

Power Consumption

Even if no processor intensive tasks are run, the device requires between 0.6 and 1.5 Watts. The Galaxy S4 Mini and the HTC One SV need about 0.3 Watts less. Under load, the Optimus F5 requires between 3.4 and 4.1 Watts. Overall, the competitors perform similar here. The S4 Mini needs between 3.4 and 3.9 Watts and the One SV between 2.8 and 4.2 Watts. Only the Lumia 720 performs significantly better and needs about 1 Watt less than the Optimus F5 (Lumia 720: 3.1 – 3.3 Watts).

Power Consumption

Off / Standby 0.0 / 0.1 Watt
Idle 0.6 / 1.2 / 1.5 Watt
Load 3.4 / 4.1 Watt
 
Key: min: , med: , max:         Voltcraft VC 940

Battery Life

With 2150 mAh (7.95 Wh) the capacity of the battery is more than up-to-date for the size of the smartphone (Galaxy S4 Mini: 1900 mAh). Therefore, we expect a decent battery life. We tested three scenarios to see whether this is actually true.

With the Stability Test app, we simulated full load with maximum display brightness and all wireless modules enabled. We were confused when the display started to automatically dim after a few minutes. As we tried to counteract, we received the message: "Because of the temperature rise, it is not possible to increase the brightness". During the test, the brightness fell down to 51% of the maximum. Therefore, you should take the result of the full load test with a pinch of salt. It can be reproduced, but not directly compared to other models. Much to our surprise the device already shut down after just above 3 hours despite the dimming. The idle result of 14 hours and 15 minutes is also not good. The Galaxy S4 Mini achieves nearly 20 hours in this scenario. We simulated Internet surfing with a script. With a brightness of about 50%, the Optimus once again, cannot keep up with the S4 Mini. With 8 hours and 4 minutes, the battery life is several hours shorter. Despite a powerful battery the Optimus F5's battery life is only modest.

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
14h 15min
WiFi Surfing
10h 00min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 04min

Verdict

Not stunning - the LG Optimus F5
Not stunning - the LG Optimus F5

The first impression is often decisive and so it was with the LG P875 Optimus F5's. Already the first hands-on was boring. Design and haptics are not particularly innovative and the hardware can be found in many devices. It features an SoC from Qualcomm with a clock rate of 1.2 GHz and 1 GB RAM. In addition, the Optimus F5 comes with the usual wireless modules including LTE, NFC, and Bluetooth. Admittedly, the smartphone performs well and achieves satisfactory results in the benchmarks. Videos run smoothly and current 3D games do not pose a problem. Unfortunately, the battery life is only modest. The latter is also not improved by the "feature" which automatically dims the display when the device gets too hot.

What makes it even worse is the very high RRP of 399 Euros (~$528). At the time of testing the street price was 350 Euros (~$464) – which is still too high in our opinion. If you consider buying the Optimus F5, you should also consider the Galaxy S4 Mini. The latter is a significantly more attractive mobile phone of notably higher quality for a similar price.

Test sample courtesy of ... GetGoods
static version load dynamic

Comment this article:

In Review: LG P875 Optimus F5. Test sample courtesy of:
In Review: LG P875 Optimus F5. Test sample courtesy of:

Specifications

LG P875 Optimus F5

:: Processor
:: Memory
1024 MB
:: Graphics adapter
:: Display
4.3 inch 16:9, 960x540 pixel, capacitive, IPS-LCD, IPS, qHD resolution, 16.7 million colors, glossy: yes
:: Harddisk
8 GB SSD, 8 GB , 5.02 GB free
:: Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm jack, Card Reader: micro SD slot, Sensors: proximity sensor, compass, accelerometer, light sensor,
:: Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b g n ), 4.0 Bluetooth, UMTS, LTE
:: Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 126.04 x 64.46 x 9.3
:: Weight
0.1311 kg Power Supply: 0.0435 kg
:: Battery
7.955 Wh Lithium-Ion, 2150 mAh
Talk time 2G (according to manufacturer): 12 h, Talk time 3G (according to manufacturer): 8 h, Standby 3G (according to manufacturer): 500 h
:: Price
399 Euro
:: Operating System
Android 4.1 Jelly Bean
:: Additional features
Webcam: main camera: 5 MP, front camera: 1.3 MP, Speakers: mono, Keyboard: virtual, 24 Months Warranty

 

[+] compare
The outside of the LG Optimus F5 is completely made from
The outside of the LG Optimus F5 is completely made from
plastic and can not score points in haptics.
plastic and can not score points in haptics.
The display bezel has a glossy chrome look - a matter of taste
The display bezel has a glossy chrome look - a matter of taste
Micro SD card and Micro SIM card
Micro SD card and Micro SIM card
are inserted beneath the back cover.
are inserted beneath the back cover.
The case houses the usual connectivity and buttons.
The case houses the usual connectivity and buttons.
The 5 MP camera shoots decent pictures.
The 5 MP camera shoots decent pictures.
Colors are realistic and images sharp.
Colors are realistic and images sharp.
The battery has a big capacity of 2150 mAh.
The battery has a big capacity of 2150 mAh.
Nevertheless, we expected a longer battery life.
Nevertheless, we expected a longer battery life.
Size comparison with 4.7 inch Huawei Ascend P2.
Size comparison with 4.7 inch Huawei Ascend P2.
Android 4.1.2. is pre-installed.
Android 4.1.2. is pre-installed.
Several layout changes in the system settings
Several layout changes in the system settings
Virtual keyboard in portrait mode.
Virtual keyboard in portrait mode.
Not much free space in landscape mode if the keyboard is expanded.
Not much free space in landscape mode if the keyboard is expanded.
About 5 GB memory are available.
About 5 GB memory are available.
Naturally, the 1.2 GHz SoC produces some heat.
Naturally, the 1.2 GHz SoC produces some heat.
LG counteracts the increasing temperature by dimming the display.
LG counteracts the increasing temperature by dimming the display.
It may be open to doubt whether this is the best method.
It may be open to doubt whether this is the best method.
Overall, the LG Optimus F5 is a mixed bag.
Overall, the LG Optimus F5 is a mixed bag.

Similar Smartphones

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

» Review HTC One Mini Smartphone
Snapdragon 400 8930AB
» Review Sony Xperia L Smartphone
Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8230
» Review Nokia Lumia 720 Smartphone
Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8227
» Review HTC One SV Smartphone
Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8930

Devices with the same GPU

» LG G Pad 8.0 V480 Tablet Review
Snapdragon 400 MSM8226, 8.0", 0.338 kg
» Sony Xperia T3 Smartphone Review
Snapdragon 400 MSM8928, 5.3", 0.148 kg

Links

Compare Prices

Pro

+LTE module
+high contrast
+good images
 

Cons

-mediocre battery life
-too high a price
-narrow viewing angles
-not an innovative design

Shortcut

What we like

The pictures from the main camera are amazingly sharp for a 5 MP sensor. In addition, the colors are realistic and close to the reference camera's.

What we would like to see

In our opinion, the price of the smartphone is significantly too high and therefore, the Optimus F5 is no longer competitive.

What surprises us

So far, we never saw a device that reduces its brightness when it gets too hot. We doubt that this is necessary as the thermal management of other manufacturers does not include such a "feature".

The competition

Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini

Nokia Lumia 720

HTC One SV

Rating

LG P875 Optimus F5
08/05/2013 v3
Daniel Schuster

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
49%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
40%
Weight
100%
Battery
95%
Display
82%
Games Performance
36%
Application Performance
50%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Add Points
65%
Average
73%
84%
Smartphone *
Weighted Average

> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > Review LG P875 Optimus F5 Smartphone
Author: Daniel Schuster, 2013-08- 1 (Update: 2013-08- 2)