Notebookcheck Logo

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 vs ATI Radeon HD 3100

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400 IGP (or just Radeon HD 3400) is most probably a chipset graphics card for laptops. It is used in the Lenovo Edge laptops with AMD processor and should be slower than the HD 4225 IGP. Therefore, it can be based on the HD 3200 or HD 4225 chipset with different clock speeds. See both pages for more information on the graphics card and benchmarks.

ATI Radeon HD 3100

► remove from comparison

The AMD ATI Radeon HD 3100 (without the Mobility brand) is an onboard graphics card by AMD for the Turion X2 (Ultra) CPUs. It is built in the RS780MC chipset and is basically a HD 3200 with a slower clock speed and some reduced features (some sources say reduced video accelleration). The clock rate and feature set can be different depending on the laptop model. E.g. core clocks of 300 and 350 MHz have been reported by GPU-Z (Hd 3200 up to 500 MHz).

The 3D performance is similar to the HD 3200 one and therefore relatively good for an integrated chipset (much faster than the GMA 4500MHD and a bit beyond the GeForce 9400M). For older or less demanding games the performance may be sufficient.

Using Windows XP, the HD 3200 seems to have problems with current and older drivers, as there is no 2D accelleration. This leads to very slow interactions with windows and scrolling (especially with Firefox as reported in various discussion boards). More information on the topic can be found at Planet 3D Now (de) or the AMD forum.

ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3400ATI Radeon HD 3100
Radeon HD 3000 Series
Radeon HD 3200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Radeon HD 3100 40 @ 0.35 GHz
Radeon HD 3200 compare 40 @ 0.5 GHz
Mobility Radeon HD 3400
Radeon HD 3100 40 @ 0.35 GHz
ArchitectureRV6xxRV6xx
Shared Memoryyesyes
Date of Announcement01.08.2010 01.08.2008
CodenameRS780MC
Pipelines40 - unified
Core Speed350 MHz
Max. Amount of Memory512 MB
APIDirectX 10, Shader 4.0
technology55 nm
FeaturesAvivo HD, Hybrid Graphics Technology, PCI-E 2.0, Vari-Bright (Bildschirmhelligkeit automtisch anpassen), HDCP support, Display Cache
Link to Manufacturer Pagewww.amd.com

Benchmarks

3DMark 03 - 3DMark 03 - Standard
min: 2439     avg: 2720     median: 2719.5 (1%)     max: 3000 Points
3DMark 06 3DMark 06 - Score Unknown Settings + ATI Radeon HD 3100
3DMark 06
min: 975     avg: 1176     median: 1164 (2%)     max: 1390 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Gaming graphics
4.5 Points (57%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 Graphics
3.1 Points (39%)

Average Benchmarks ATI Radeon HD 3100 → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

World in Conflict - Benchmark

World in Conflict - Benchmark

2007
med. 1024x768
Radeon HD 3100:
5  fps
ATI Radeon HD 3100lowmed.highultraQHD4K
World in Conflict - Benchmark5
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps



1














For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 17:07:19

#0 checking url part for id 2038 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 876 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Apr 2024 05:39:00 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.086s ... 0.087s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.087s

#6 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.087s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2038 +0.023s ... 0.11s

#8 got single benchmarks 2038 +0s ... 0.11s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 876 +0.001s ... 0.112s

#10 got single benchmarks 876 +0.019s ... 0.131s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.131s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.049s ... 0.18s

#13 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.18s

#14 Got 1 rows for game benchmarks. +0.002s ... 0.182s

#15 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.182s

#16 got data and put it in $dataArray +0s ... 0.182s

#17 benchmarks composed for output. +0.004s ... 0.186s

#18 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.186s

#19 return log +0.037s ... 0.223s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)